Single-nucleus Hi-C reveals unique chromatin reorganization at oocyte-to-zygote transition

Nature

Volumn 544, Issue 7648, 2017, Pages 110-114

  Flyamer, Ilya M ^a,b,c,g   Gassler, Johanna ^a   Imakaev, Maxim ^d,e   Brandão, Hugo B ^f   Ulianov, Sergey V ^b,c   Abdennur, Nezar ^e   Razin, Sergey V ^b,c   Mirny, Leonid A ^d,e,f   Tachibana Konwalski, Kikuë ^a  

^a ERICH SCHMID INSTITUTE OF MATERIALS SCIENCE   (Austria)

^b INSTITUTE OF GENE BIOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

^c MOSCOW STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^d Massachusetts Institute of Technology Cambridge   (United States)

^e MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^f HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CARBON; CELLS AND CELL COMPONENTS; CHROMOSOME; EGG; FERTILIZATION (REPRODUCTION); GENOME; GUIDELINE; HELIUM; PIGMENT;

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL CYCLE G1 PHASE; CELL NUCLEUS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMATIN STRUCTURE; CHROMOSOME 1; CHROMOSOME 11; CHROMOSOME 2; CHROMOSOME STRUCTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FERTILIZATION; FIBROBLAST; FLUORESCENCE IN SITU HYBRIDIZATION; GENE AMPLIFICATION; INTERPHASE; MALE; MOUSE; MOUSE EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; NONHUMAN; OOCYTE; OOCYTE MATURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SOMATIC CELL; SPERM; ZYGOTE; ANIMAL; CELL TRANSDIFFERENTIATION; CHEMISTRY; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME POSITIONING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFORMATION; CYTOLOGY; FEMALE; GENETICS; HAPLOIDY; MARKOV CHAIN; MATERNAL INHERITANCE; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PATERNAL INHERITANCE; PROCEDURES; SINGLE CELL ANALYSIS; TOTIPOTENT STEM CELL;

MUS;

CHROMATIN;

ANIMALS; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL TRANSDIFFERENTIATION; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME POSITIONING; FEMALE; HAPLOIDY; INTERPHASE; MATERNAL INHERITANCE; MICE; NUCLEIC ACID CONFORMATION; OOCYTES; PATERNAL INHERITANCE; SINGLE-CELL ANALYSIS; STOCHASTIC PROCESSES; TOTIPOTENT STEM CELLS; ZYGOTE;

EID: 85017120779     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature21711     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Zhou, L. Q. & Dean, J. Reprogramming the genome to totipotency in mouse embryos. Trends Cell Biol. 25, 82-91 (2015).
2. Nagano, T. et al. Single-cell Hi-C reveals cell-to-cell variability in chromosome structure. Nature 502, 59-64 (2013).
3. Ma, W. et al. Fine-scale chromatin interaction maps reveal the cis-regulatory landscape of human lincRNA genes. Nat. Methods 12, 71-78 (2015).
4. Hsieh, T.-H. S. et al. Mapping nucleosome resolution chromosome folding in yeast by micro-C. Cell 162, 108-119 (2015).
5. Barutcu, A. R. et al. C-ing the genome: a compendium of chromosome conformation capture methods to study higher-order chromatin organization. J. Cell. Physiol. 231, 31-35 (2016).
6. Lieberman-Aiden, E. et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326, 289-293 (2009).
7. Rodley, C. D. M., Bertels, F., Jones, B. & O'Sullivan, J. M. Global identification of yeast chromosome interactions using Genome conformation capture. Fungal Genet. Biol. 46, 879-886 (2009).
8. Rao, S. S. P. et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell 159, 1665-1680 (2014).
9. Nagano, T. et al. Cell cycle dynamics of chromosomal organisation at single-cell resolution. Preprint at bioRxiv http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/12/15/094466 (2016).
10. Ramani, V. et al. Massively multiplex single-cell Hi-C. Nat. Methods 14, 263-266 (2017).
11. Naumova, N. et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science 342, 948-953 (2013).
12. Mizuguchi, T. et al. Cohesin-dependent globules and heterochromatin shape 3D genome architecture in S. pombe. Nature 516, 432-435 (2014).
13. Tjong, H., Gong, K., Chen, L. & Alber, F. Physical tethering and volume exclusion determine higher-order genome organization in budding yeast. Genome Res. 22, 1295-1305 (2012).
14. Halverson, J. D., Smrek, J., Kremer, K. & Grosberg, A. Y. From a melt of rings to chromosome territories: the role of topological constraints in genome folding. Rep. Prog. Phys. 77, 022601 (2014).
15. Dixon, J. R. et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature 485, 376-380 (2012).
16. Nora, E. P. et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature 485, 381-385 (2012).
17. Flavahan, W. A. et al. Insulator dysfunction and oncogene activation in IDH mutant gliomas. Nature 529, 110-114 (2016).
18. Franke, M. et al. Formation of new chromatin domains determines pathogenicity of genomic duplications. Nature 538, 265-269 (2016).
19. Lupiáñez, D. G. et al. Disruptions of topological chromatin domains cause pathogenic rewiring of gene-enhancer interactions. Cell 161, 1012-1025 (2015).
20. Crane, E. et al. Condensin-driven remodelling of X chromosome topology during dosage compensation. Nature 523, 240-244 (2015).
21. Sanborn, A. L. et al. Chromatin extrusion explains key features of loop and domain formation in wild-type and engineered genomes. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 112, E6456-E6465 (2015).
22. Fudenberg, G. et al. Formation of chromosomal domains by loop extrusion. Cell Reports 15, 2038-2049 (2016).
23. Miyara, F. et al. Chromatin configuration and transcriptional control in human and mouse oocytes. Mol. Reprod. Dev. 64, 458-470 (2003).
24. Bouniol-Baly, C. et al. Differential transcriptional activity associated with chromatin configuration in fully grown mouse germinal vesicle oocytes. Biol. Reprod. 60, 580-587 (1999).
25. Battulin, N. et al. Comparison of the three-dimensional organization of sperm and fibroblast genomes using the Hi-C approach. Genome Biol. 16, 77 (2015).
26. Ward, W. S. & Coffey, D. S. DNA packaging and organization in mammalian spermatozoa: comparison with somatic cells. Biol. Reprod. 44, 569-574 (1991).
27. Schwarzer, W. et al. Two independent modes of chromosome organization are revealed by cohesin removal. Preprint at bioRxiv http://biorxiv.org/content/early/2016/12/15/094185 (2016).
28. Adenot, P. G., Mercier, Y., Renard, J. P. & Thompson, E. M. Differential H4 acetylation of paternal and maternal chromatin precedes DNA replication and differential transcriptional activity in pronuclei of 1-cell mouse embryos. Development 124, 4615-4625 (1997).
29. Tachibana-Konwalski, K. et al. Rec8-containing cohesin maintains bivalents without turnover during the growing phase of mouse oocytes. Genes Dev. 24, 2505-2516 (2010).
30. Selvaraj, S., R Dixon, J., Bansal, V. & Ren, B. Whole-genome haplotype reconstruction using proximity-ligation and shotgun sequencing. Nat. Biotechnol. 31, 1111-1118 (2013).
31. Dixon, J. R. et al. Chromatin architecture reorganization during stem cell differentiation. Nature 518, 331-336 (2015).
32. Zuin, J. et al. Cohesin and CTCF differentially affect chromatin architecture and gene expression in human cells. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 996-1001 (2014).
33. Jin, F. et al. A high-resolution map of the three-dimensional chromatin interactome in human cells. Nature 503, 290-294 (2013).
34. Wang, Z. et al. The properties of genome conformation and spatial gene interaction and regulation networks of normal and malignant human cell types. PLoS One 8, e58793 (2013).
35. Sofueva, S. et al. Cohesin-mediated interactions organize chromosomal domain architecture. EMBO J. 32, 3119-3129 (2013).
36. Zhang, Y. et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell 148, 908-921 (2012).
37. McCord, R. P. et al. Correlated alterations in genome organization, histone methylation, and DNA-lamin A/C interactions in Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome. Genome Res. 23, 260-269 (2013).
38. Lin, Y. C. et al. Global changes in the nuclear positioning of genes and intraand interdomain genomic interactions that orchestrate B cell fate. Nat. Immunol. 13, 1196-1204 (2012).
39. Kalhor, R., Tjong, H., Jayathilaka, N., Alber, F. & Chen, L. Solid-phase chromosome conformation capture for structural characterization of genome architectures. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 90-98 (2011).
40. Chandra, T. et al. Global reorganization of the nuclear landscape in senescent cells. Cell Reports 10, 471-483 (2015).