Comparison of the three-dimensional organization of sperm and fibroblast genomes using the Hi-C approach

Genome Biology

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Battulin, Nariman ^a,b,e   Fishman, Veniamin S ^a,b,e   Mazur, Alexander M ^c,e   Pomaznoy, Mikhail ^a,b   Khabarova, Anna A ^a,e   Afonnikov, Dmitry A ^a,b,e   Prokhortchouk, Egor B ^c,d,e   Serov, Oleg L ^a,b,e  

^a INSTITUTE OF CYTOLOGY AND GENETICS   (Russian Federation)

^b NOVOSIBIRSK STATE UNIVERSITY   (Russian Federation)

^c INSTITUTE OF BIOENGINEERING   (Russian Federation)

^d KURCHATOV INSTITUTE   (Russian Federation)

^e SKOLKOVO INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL CELL; ARTICLE; CELL COMPARTMENTALIZATION; CELL DENSITY; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOME 19; CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA BASE COMPOSITION; DNA PACKAGING; EMBRYO; EMBRYONIC STEM CELL; FIBROBLAST; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE INTERACTION; GENETIC DISTANCE; GENOME ANALYSIS; MALE; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; SPERM; SPERMATOZOON; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CHROMOSOME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFORMATION; CYTOLOGY; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDY; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOMICS; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES; THEORETICAL MODEL;

CHROMATIN;

ANIMALS; CHROMATIN; CHROMOSOMES; FIBROBLASTS; GENETIC ASSOCIATION STUDIES; GENETIC LOCI; GENOME; GENOMICS; MALE; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MODELS, THEORETICAL; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 84939154060     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-015-0642-0     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Lanctôt C, Cheutin T, Cremer M, Cavalli G, Cremer T. Dynamic genome architecture in the nuclear space: regulation of gene expression in three dimensions. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8:104-15.
2. Joffe B, Leonhardt H, Solovei I. Differentiation and large scale spatial organization of the genome. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2010;20:562-9.
3. Markaki Y, Gunkel M, Schermelleh L, Beichmanis S, Neumann J, Heidemann M, et al. Functional nuclear organization of transcription and DNA replication: a topographical marriage between chromatin domains and the interchromatin compartment. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2010;75:475-92.
4. Cremer T, Cremer C. Chromosome territories, nuclear architecture and gene regulation in mammalian cells. Nat Rev Genet. 2001;2:292-301.
5. Sproul D, Gilbert N, Bickmore WA. The role of chromatin structure in regulating the expression of clustered genes. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6:775-81.
6. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science. 2002;295:1306-11.
7. Zhao Z, Tavoosidana G, Sjölinder M, Göndör A, Mariano P, Wang S, et al. Circular chromosome conformation capture (4C) uncovers extensive networks of epigenetically regulated intra- and interchromosomal interactions. Nat Genet. 2006;38:1341-7.
8. Simonis M, Klous P, Splinter E, Moshkin Y, Willemsen R, de Wit E, et al. Nuclear organization of active and inactive chromatin domains uncovered by chromosome conformation capture-on-chip (4C). Nat Genet. 2006;38:1348-54.
9. Dostie J, Richmond TA, Arnaout RA, Selzer RR, Lee WL, Honan TA, et al. Chromosome Conformation Capture Carbon Copy (5C): a massively parallel solution for mapping interactions between genomic elements. Genome Res. 2006;16:1299-309.
10. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, et al. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science. 2009;326:289-93.
11. Dekker J, Marti-Renom MA, Mirny LA. Exploring the three-dimensional organization of genomes: interpreting chromatin interaction data. Nat Rev Genet. 2013;14:390-403.
12. Eskeland R, Leeb M, Grimes GR, Kress C, Boyle S, Sproul D, et al. Ring1b compacts chromatin structure and represses gene expression independent of histone ubiquitination. Mol Cell. 2010;38:452-64.
13. Kalhor R, Tjong H, Jayathilaka N, Alber F, Chen L. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nat Biotechnol. 2012;30:90-8.
14. Zhang Y, McCord RP, Ho YJ, Lajoie BR, Hildebrand DG, Simon AC, et al. Spatial organization of the mouse genome and its role in recurrent chromosomal translocations. Cell. 2012;148:908-21.
15. Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, McCord RP, Naumova N, Goloborodko A, Lajoie BR, et al. Iterative correction of Hi-C data reveals hallmarks of chromosome organization. Nat Methods. 2012;9:999-1003.
16. Dixon JR, Selvaraj S, Yue F, Kim A, Li Y, Shen Y, et al. Topological domains in mammalian genomes identified by analysis of chromatin interactions. Nature. 2012;485:376-80.
17. Nora EP, Lajoie BR, Schulz EG, Giorgetti L, Okamoto I, Servant N, et al. Spatial partitioning of the regulatory landscape of the X-inactivation centre. Nature. 2012;485:381-5.
18. Mudrak O, Zalenskaya I, Zalensky A. Organization of chromosomes during spermatogenesis and in mature sperm. In: Rousseaux S, Khochbin S, editors. Epigenetics and human reproduction. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer; 2011. p. 261-77.
19. Johnson GD, Lalancette C, Linnemann AK, Leduc F, Boissonneault G, Krawetz SA. The sperm nucleus: chromatin, RNA, and the nuclear matrix. Reproduction. 2011;141:21-36.
20. Reshef DN, Reshef YA, Finucane HK, Grossman SR, McVean G, Turnbaugh PJ, et al. Detecting novel associations in large data sets. Science. 2011;334:1518-24.
21. Naumova N, Imakaev M, Fudenberg G, Zhan Y, Lajoie BR, Mirny LA, et al. Organization of the mitotic chromosome. Science. 2013;342:948-53.
22. Hu M, Deng K, Qin Z, Dixon J, Selvaraj S, Fang J, et al. Bayesian inference of spatial organizations of chromosomes. PLoS Comput Biol. 2013;9, e1002893.
23. Rao SSP, Huntley MH, Durand NC, Stamenova EK, Bochkov ID, Robinson JT, et al. A 3D map of the human genome at kilobase resolution reveals principles of chromatin looping. Cell. 2014;159:1665-80.
24. Symmons O, Uslu VV, Tsujimura T, Ruf S, Nassari S, Schwarzer W, et al. Functional and topological characteristics of mammalian regulatory domains. Genome Res. 2014;24:390-400.
25. Trimarchi T, Bilal E, Ntziachristos P, Fabbri G, Dalla-Favera R, Tsirigos A, et al. Genome-wide mapping and characterization of notch-regulated long noncoding RNAs in acute leukemia. Cell. 2014;158:593-606.
26. Tark-Dame M, Jerabek H, Manders EMM, Heermann DW, van Driel R. Depletion of the chromatin looping proteins CTCF and cohesin causes chromatin compaction: insight into chromatin folding by polymer modelling. PLoS Comput Biol. 2014;10, e1003877.
27. Brykczynska U, Hisano M, Erkek S, Ramos L, Oakeley EJ, Roloff TC, et al. Repressive and active histone methylation mark distinct promoters in human and mouse spermatozoa. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2010;17:679-87.
28. Kruglova AA, Kizilova EA, Zhelezova AI, Gridina MM, Golubitsa AN, Serov OL. Embryonic stem cell/fibroblast hybrid cells with near-tetraploid karyotype provide high yield of chimeras. Cell Tissue Res. 2008;334:371-80.
29. Belton J-M, McCord RP, Gibcus JH, Naumova N, Zhan Y, Dekker J. Hi-C: a comprehensive technique to capture the conformation of genomes. Methods. 2012;58:268-76.
30. Hi-C data analysis tools by Leonid Mirny lab. http://mirnylab.bitbucket.org/hiclib/ .
31. MINE tool. http://minepy.sourceforge.net/ .
32. Duan Z, Andronescu M, Schutz K, McIlwain S, Kim YJ, Lee C, et al. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature. 2010;465:363-7.
33. Schader M, Schmid F. Two rules of thumb for the approximation of the binomial distribution by the normal distribution. Am Stat. 1989;43:23-4.
34. Servant N, Lajoie BR, Nora EP, Giorgetti L, Chen CJ, Heard E, et al. HiTC: Exploration of high-throughput 'C' experiments. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:2843-4.