Physical tethering and volume exclusion determine higher-order genome organization in budding yeast

Genome Research

Volumn 22, Issue 7, 2012, Pages 1295-1305

  Tjong, Harianto ^a   Gong, Ke ^a   Chen, Lin ^a,b   Alber, Frank ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CELL INTERACTION; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CENTROMERE; CHROMOSOME 1; CHROMOSOME 12; CHROMOSOME 3; CHROMOSOME 4; CHROMOSOME 5; CHROMOSOME 6; CHROMOSOME 7; CHROMOSOME 8; CHROMOSOME 9; CONTROLLED STUDY; FUNGAL GENETICS; GENE CLUSTER; GENE INTERACTION; GENE LOCUS; GENE REPLICATION; GENE STRUCTURE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENOME ANALYSIS; HETEROCHROMATIN; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TELOMERE;

CELL NUCLEOLUS; CELL NUCLEUS; CELL NUCLEUS SIZE; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CHROMOSOME POSITIONING; CHROMOSOMES; GENETIC LOCI; GENOME, FUNGAL; MODELS, GENETIC; MOLECULAR CONFORMATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS SIMULATION; RNA, FUNGAL; RNA, TRANSFER; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; TELOMERE;

SACCHAROMYCETALES;

EID: 84863540362     PISSN: 10889051     EISSN: 15495469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gr.129437.111     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, Suprapto A, Karni-Schmidt O, Williams R, Chait BT, et al. 2007a. Determining the architectures of macromolecular assemblies. Nature 450: 683-694.
2. Alber F, Dokudovskaya S, Veenhoff LM, Zhang W, Kipper J, Devos D, Suprapto A, Karni-Schmidt O, Williams R, Chait BT, et al. 2007b. The molecular architecture of the nuclear pore complex. Nature 450: 695-701.
3. Alber F, Forster F, Korkin D, Topf M, Sali A. 2008. Integrating diverse data for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. Annu Rev Biochem 77: 443-477.
4. Berger AB, Cabal GG, Fabre E, Duong T, Buc H, Nehrbass U, Olivo-Marin JC, Gadal O, Zimmer C. 2008. High-resolution statistical mapping reveals gene territories in live yeast. Nat Methods 5: 1031-1037.
5. Bohn M, Heermann DW. 2010. Diffusion-driven looping provides a consistent framework for chromatin organization. PLoS ONE 5: e12218. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012218.
6. Brown KE, Guest SS, Smale ST, Hahm K, Merkenschlager M, Fisher AG. 1997. Association of transcriptionally silent genes with Ikaros complexes at centromeric heterochromatin. Cell 91: 845-854.
7. Bystricky K, Heun P, Gehlen L, Langowski J, Gasser SM. 2004. Long-range compaction and flexibility of interphase chromatin in budding yeast analyzed by high-resolution imaging techniques. Proc Natl Acad Sci 101: 16495-16500.
8. Bystricky K, Laroche T, van Houwe G, Blaszczyk M, Gasser SM. 2005. Chromosome looping in yeast: telomere pairing and coordinated movement reflect anchoring efficiency and territorial organization. J Cell Biol 168: 375-387.
9. Cabal GG, Genovesio A, Rodriguez-Navarro S, Zimmer C, Gadal O, Lesne A, Buc H, Feuerbach-Fournier F, Olivo-Marin JC, Hurt EC, et al. 2006. SAGA interacting factors confine sub-diffusion of transcribed genes to the nuclear envelope. Nature 441: 770-773.
10. Casolari JM, Brown CR, Komili S, West J, Hieronymus H, Silver PA. 2004. Genome-wide localization of the nuclear transport machinery couples transcriptional status and nuclear organization. Cell 117: 427-439.
11. Chubb JR, Bickmore WA. 2003. Considering nuclear compartmentalization in the light of nuclear dynamics. Cell 112: 403-406.
12. Cockell M, Gasser SM. 1999. Nuclear compartments and gene regulation. Curr Opin Genet Dev 9: 199-205.
13. Cook PR, Marenduzzo D. 2009. Entropic organization of interphase chromosomes. J Cell Biol 186: 825-834.
14. Csink AK, Henikoff S. 1996. Genetic modification of heterochromatic association and nuclear organization in Drosophila. Nature 381: 529-531.
15. Csink AK, Henikoff S. 1998. Large-scale chromosomal movements during interphase progression in Drosophila. J Cell Biol 143: 13-22.
16. Cui Y, Bustamante C. 2000. Pulling a single chromatin fiber reveals the forces that maintain its higher-order structure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97: 127-132.
17. Dekker J. 2008. Mapping in vivo chromatin interactions in yeast suggests an extended chromatin fiber with regional variation in compaction. J Biol Chem 283: 34532-34540.
18. Dekker J, Rippe K, Dekker M, Kleckner N. 2002. Capturing chromosome conformation. Science 295: 1306-1311.
19. de Nooijer S, Wellink J, Mulder B, Bisseling T. 2009. Non-specific interactions are sufficient to explain the position of heterochromatic chromocenters and nucleoli in interphase nuclei. Nucleic Acids Res 37: 3558-3568.
20. Dernburg AF, Broman KW, Fung JC, Marshall WF, Philips J, Agard DA, Sedat JW. 1996. Perturbation of nuclear architecture by long-distance chromosome interactions. Cell 85: 745-759.
21. Di Rienzi SC, Collingwood D, Raghuraman MK, Brewer BJ. 2009. Fragile genomic sites are associated with origins of replication. Genome Biol Evol 1: 350-363.
22. Dorier J, Stasiak A. 2010. The role of transcription factories-mediated interchromosomal contacts in the organization of nuclear architecture. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 7410-7421.
23. Duan Z, Andronescu M, Schutz K, McIlwain S, Kim YJ, Lee C, Shendure J, Fields S, Blau CA, Noble WS. 2010. A three-dimensional model of the yeast genome. Nature 465: 363-367.
24. Dvorkin N, Clark MW, Hamkalo BA. 1991. Ultrastructural localization of nucleic acid sequences in Saccharomyces cerevisiae nucleoli. Chromosoma 100: 519-523.
25. Feng W, Collingwood D, Boeck ME, Fox LA, Alvino GM, Fangman WL, Raghuraman MK, Brewer BJ. 2006. Genomic mapping of single-stranded DNA in hydroxyurea-challenged yeasts identifies origins of replication. Nat Cell Biol 8: 148-155.
26. Ferguson M, Ward DC. 1992. Cell cycle dependent chromosomal movement in pre-mitotic human T-lymphocyte nuclei. Chromosoma 101: 557-565.
27. Gasser SM. 2002. Visualizing chromatin dynamics in interphase nuclei. Science 296: 1412-1416.
28. Gerchman SE, Ramakrishnan V. 1987. Chromatin higher-order structure studied by neutron scattering and scanning transmission electron microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci 84: 7802-7806.
29. Gotta M, Laroche T, Formenton A, Maillet L, Scherthan H, Gasser SM. 1996. The clustering of telomeres and colocalization with Rap1, Sir3, and Sir4 proteins in wild-type Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Biol 134: 1349-1363.
30. Hediger F, Neumann FR, Van Houwe G, Dubrana K, Gasser SM. 2002. Live imaging of telomeres: yKu and Sir proteins define redundant telomere-anchoring pathways in yeast. Curr Biol 12: 2076-2089.
31. Heun P, Laroche T, Shimada K, Furrer P, Gasser SM. 2001. Chromosome dynamics in the yeast interphase nucleus. Science 294: 2181-2186.
32. Horigome C, Okada T, Shimazu K, Gasser SM, Mizuta K. 2011. Ribosome biogenesis factors bind a nuclear envelope SUN domain protein to cluster yeast telomeres. EMBO J 30: 3799-3811.
33. Jin QW, Fuchs J, Loidl J. 2000. Centromere clustering is a major determinant of yeast interphase nuclear organization. J Cell Sci 113: 1903-1912.
34. Kalhor R, Tjong H, Jayathilaka N, Alber F, Chen L. 2012. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nat Biotechnol 30: 90-98.
35. Kim YH, Ishikawa D, Ha HP, Sugiyama M, Kaneko Y, Harashima S. 2006. Chromosome XII context is important for rDNA function in yeast. Nucleic Acids Res 34: 2914-2924.
36. Langowski J. 2006. Polymer chain models of DNA and chromatin. Eur Phys J E Soft Matter 19: 241-249.
37. Lieberman-Aiden E, van Berkum NL, Williams L, Imakaev M, Ragoczy T, Telling A, Amit I, Lajoie BR, Sabo PJ, Dorschner MO, et al. 2009. Comprehensive mapping of long-range interactions reveals folding principles of the human genome. Science 326: 289-293.
38. Maillet L, Boscheron C, Gotta M, Marcand S, Gilson E, Gasser SM. 1996. Evidence for silencing compartments within the yeast nucleus: a role for telomere proximity and Sir protein concentration in silencer-mediated repression. Genes Dev 10: 1796-1811.
39. Marshall WF, Straight A, Marko JF, Swedlow J, Dernburg A, Belmont A, Murray AW, Agard DA, Sedat JW. 1997. Interphase chromosomes undergo constrained diffusional motion in living cells. Curr Biol 7: 930-939.
40. Mateos-Langerak J, Bohn M, de Leeuw W, Giromus O, Manders EM, Verschure PJ, Indemans MH, Gierman HJ, Heermann DW, van Driel R, et al. 2009. Spatially confined folding of chromatin in the interphase nucleus. Proc Natl Acad Sci 106: 3812-3817.
41. McCune HJ, Danielson LS, Alvino GM, Collingwood D, Delrow JJ, Fangman WL, Brewer BJ, Raghuraman MK. 2008. The temporal program of chromosome replication: genomewide replication in clb5D Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genetics 180: 1833-1847.
42. Meister P, Gehlen LR, Varela E, Kalck V, Gasser SM. 2010. Visualizing yeast chromosomes and nuclear architecture. Methods Enzymol 470: 535-567.
43. Mekhail K, Moazed D. 2010. The nuclear envelope in genome organization, expression and stability. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 11: 317-328.
44. Mekhail K, Seebacher J, Gygi SP, Moazed D. 2008. Role for perinuclear chromosome tethering inmaintenance of genome stability. Nature 456: 667-670.
45. Misteli T. 2007. Beyond the sequence: cellular organization of genome function. Cell 128: 787-800.
46. Misteli T. 2012. Parallel genome universes. Nat Biotechnol 30: 55-56.
47. O'Toole ET, Winey M, McIntosh JR. 1999. High-voltage electron tomography of spindle pole bodies and early mitotic spindles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Biol Cell 10: 2017-2031.
48. Rodley CD, Bertels F, Jones B, O'Sullivan JM. 2009. Global identification of yeast chromosome interactions using genome conformation capture. Fungal Genet Biol 46: 879-886.
49. Rosa A, Becker NB, Everaers R. 2010. Looping probabilities in model interphase chromosomes. Biophys J 98: 2410-2419.
50. Russel D, Lasker K, Webb B, Velazquez-Muriel J, Tjioe E, Schneidman-Duhovny D, Peterson B, Sali A. 2012. Putting the pieces together: integrative modeling platform software for structure determination of macromolecular assemblies. PLoS Biol 10: e1001244. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio. 1001244.
51. Schober H, Kalck V, Vega-Palas MA, Van Houwe G, Sage D, Unser M, Gartenberg MR, Gasser SM. 2008. Controlled exchange of chromosomal arms reveals principles driving telomere interactions in yeast. Genome Res 18: 261-271.
52. Sekedat MD, Fenyo D, Rogers RS, Tackett AJ, Aitchison JD, Chait BT. 2010. GINS motion reveals replication fork progression is remarkably uniform throughout the yeast genome. Mol Syst Biol 6: 353. doi: 10.1038/msb.2010.8.
53. Stouffer SA, Suchman EA, DeVinney LC, Star SA, Williams RMJ. 1949. The American soldier: Adjustment during army life. Princeton University Press, Princeton.
54. Taddei A, Hedinger F, Neumann FR, Bauer C, Gasser SM. 2004. Separation of silencing from perinuclear anchoring functions in yeast Ku80, Sir4 and Esc1 proteins. EMBO J 23: 1301-1312.
55. Taddei A, Van Houwe G, Nagai S, Erb I, van Nimwegen E, Gasser SM. 2009. The functional importance of telomere clustering: Global changes in gene expression result from SIR factor dispersion. Genome Res 19: 611-625.
56. Taddei A, Schober H, Gasser SM. 2010. The budding yeast nucleus. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2: a000612. doi: 10.1101/cshperspect.a000612.
57. Takizawa T, Meaburn KJ, Misteli T. 2008. The meaning of gene positioning. Cell 135: 9-13.
58. Tanizawa H, Iwasaki O, Tanaka A, Capizzi JR, Wickramasinghe P, Lee M, Fu Z, Noma K. 2010. Mapping of long-range associations throughout the fission yeast genome reveals global genome organization linked to transcriptional regulation. Nucleic Acids Res 38: 8164-8177.
59. Therizols P, Duong T, Dujon B, Zimmer C, Fabre E. 2010. Chromosome arm length and nuclear constraints determine the dynamic relationship of yeast subtelomeres. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107: 2025-2030.
60. Thoma F, Koller T, Klug A. 1979. Involvement of histone H1 in the organization of the nucleosome and of the salt-dependent superstructures of chromatin. J Cell Biol 83: 403-427.
61. Thompson M, Haeusler RA, Good PD, Engelke DR. 2003. Nucleolar clustering of dispersed tRNA genes. Science 302: 1399-1401.
62. Towbin BD, Meister P, Gasser SM. 2009. The nuclear envelope: A scaffold for silencing? Curr Opin Genet Dev 19: 180-186.
63. Yaffe E, Tanay A. 2011. Probabilistic modeling of Hi-C contact maps eliminates systematic biases to characterize global chromosomal architecture. Nat Genet 43: 1059-1065.
64. Yang CH, Lambie EJ, Hardin J, Craft J, Snyder M. 1989. Higher order structure is present in the yeast nucleus: autoantibody probes demonstrate that the nucleolus lies opposite the spindle pole body. Chromosoma 98: 123-128.
65. Zeileis A, Kleiber C, Krämer W, Hornik K. 2003. Testing and dating of structural changes in practice. Comput Stat Data Anal 44: 109-123.
66. Zimmer C, Fabre E. 2011. Principles of chromosomal organization: Lessons from yeast. J Cell Biol 192: 723-733.