Debates—Hypothesis testing in hydrology: Theory and practice

Water Resources Research

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2017, Pages 1792-1798

  Pfister, Laurent ^a   Kirchner, James W ^b,c,d  

^a LUXEMBOURG INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Luxembourg)

^b ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c SWISS FEDERAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE WSL   (Switzerland)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

confirmation bias; estimation and forecasting; exploratory research; hydrological theory; hypothesis testing; modeling; streamflow

Indexed keywords

MODELS; PERSONAL COMPUTING; STREAM FLOW;

CONFIRMATION BIAS; EXPLORATORY RESEARCH; HYDROLOGICAL THEORY; HYPOTHESIS TESTING; OBSERVATION AND MEASUREMENT; RECENT RESEARCHES; SCIENTIFIC PROGRESS; THEORY AND PRACTICE;

HYDROLOGY;

EID: 85016926550     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: 19447973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/2016WR020116     Document Type: Note

References (50)

1. Baker, V. R. (2017), Debates—Hypothesis testing in hydrology: Pursuing certainty versus pursuing uberty, Water Resour. Res., 53, doi:10.1002/2016WR020078.
2. Betson, R. P. (1964), What is watershed runoff?, J. Geophys. Res., 69, 1541–1552, doi:10.1029/JZ069i008p01541.
3. Beven, K., and P. Germann (2013), Macropores and water flow in soils revisited, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3071–3092, doi:10.1002/wrcr.20156.
4. Beven, K. J. (2001), On hypothesis testing in hydrology, Hydrol. Processes, 15, 1655–1657, doi:10.1002/hyp.436.
5. Beven, K. J. (2010), Preferential flows and travel time distributions: Defining adequate hypothesis tests for hydrological process models, Hydrol. Processes, 24(12), 1537–1547.
6. Beven, K. J. (2012), Causal models as multiple working hypotheses about environmental processes, C. R. Geosci., 344(2), 77–88.
7. Beven, K. J., and J. Freer (2001), Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology, J. Hydrol., 249, 11–29, doi:10.1016/S0022-1694(01)00421-8.
8. Beven, K. J., and P. F. Germann (1982), Macropores and water flow in soils, Water Resour. Res., 18, 1311–1325.
9. Beven, K. J., and I. Westerberg (2011), On red herrings and real herrings: Disinformation and information in hydrological inference, Hydrol. Processes, 25, 1676–1680, doi:10.1002/hyp.7963.
10. Blöschl, G., et al. (2016), The Hydrological Open Air Laboratory (HOAL) in Petzenkirchen: A hypothesis-driven observatory, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 20, 227–255.
11. Bogena, H. R. (2016), TERENO: German network of terrestrial environmental observatories, JLSRF, 2, A52, 1–8, doi:10.17815/jlsrf2-98.
12. Bras, R., and P. S. Eagleson (1987), Hydrology, the forgotten Earth science, Eos Trans. AGU, 68, 227.
13. Brooks, R., R. Barnard, R. Coulombe, and J. J. McDonnell (2010), Ecohydrologic separation of water between trees and streams in a Mediterranean climate, Nat. Geosci., 3, 100–104, doi:10.1038/NGEO722.
14. Burt, T. P., and J. J. McDonnell (2015), Whither field hydrology?, The need for discovery science and outrageous hydrological hypotheses, Water Resour. Res., 51, 5919–5928, doi:10.1002/2014WR016839.
15. Chamberlin, T. C. (1890), The method of multiple working hypotheses, Science, 15, 92–96 (reprinted 1965, Science, 148, 754–759).
16. Clark, M., D. Kavetski, and F. Fenicia (2011), Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modelling, Water Resour. Res., 47, W09301, doi:10.1029/2010WR009827.
17. Dansgaard, W. (1964), Stable isotopes in precipitation, Tellus XVI(4), 436–468.
18. Dawson, T. E., and J. R. Ehleringer (1991), Streamside trees that do not use stream water, Nature, 350, 335–337.
19. Dooge, J. C. I. (1986), Looking for hydrologic laws, Water Resour. Res., 22, 46S–58S, doi:10.1029/WR022i09Sp0046S.
20. Dunne, T. (1978), Field studies of hillslope flow processes, in Hillslope Hydrology, edited by M. Kirkby, John Wiley, Chichester, U. K.
21. Emerson, G. B., W. J. Warme, F. M. Wolf, J. D. Heckman, R. A. Brand, and S. S. Leopold (2010), Testing for the presence of positive-outcome bias in peer review, Arch. Int. Med., 170, 1934–1939.
22. Godsey, S. E., et al. (2010), Generality of fractal 1/f scaling in catchment tracer time series, and its implications for catchment travel time distributions, Hydrol. Processes, 24, 1660–1671, doi:10.1002/hyp.7677.
23. Head, M. L., L. Holman, R. Lanfear, A. T. Kahn, and M. D. Jennions (2015), The extent and consequences of P-hacking in science, PLoS Biol., 13(3), e1002106, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1002106.
24. Hewlett, J. D., and A. R. Hibbert (1963), Moisture and energy conditions within a sloping soil mass during drainage, J. Geophys. Res., 68, 1081–1087, doi:10.1029/JZ068i004p01081.
25. Hornberger, G. M., and R. C. Spear (1981), An approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems, J. Environ. Manage, 12, 7–18.
26. Horton, R. E. (1933), The role of infiltration in the hydrologic cycle, Eos Trans. AGU, 14(1), 446–460, doi:10.1029/TR014i001p00446.
27. Kavetski, D., and M. Clark (2011), Numerical troubles in conceptual hydrology: Approximations, absurdities and impact on hypothesis testing, Hydrol. Processes, 25, 661–670, doi:10.1002/hyp.7899.
28. Kavetski, D., G. Kuczera, and S. W. Franks (2006), Bayesian analysis of input uncertainty in hydrological modeling: 1. Theory, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03407, doi:10.1029/2005WR004368.
29. Kerr, N. L. (1998), HARKing: Hypothesizing after the results are known, Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev., 2, 196–217.
30. Kirchner, J. W. (1990), Gaia metaphor unfalsifiable, Nature, 345, 470.
31. Kirchner, J. W., X. Feng, and C. Neal (2000), Fractal stream chemistry and its implications for contaminant transport in catchments, Nature, 403, 524–527, doi:10.1038/35000537.
32. Kirchner, J. W. (2003a), The Gaia hypothesis: Conjectures and refutations, Clim. Change, 58, 21–45.
33. Kirchner, J. W. (2003b), A double paradox in catchment hydrology and geochemistry, Hydrol. Processes, 17, 871–874, doi:10.1002/hyp.5108.
34. Kirchner, J. W. (2006), Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 42, W03S04, doi:10.1029/2005WR004362.
35. Kirchner, J. W., and C. Neal (2013), Universal fractal scaling in stream chemistry and its implications for solute transport and water quality trend detection, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 110(30), 12,213–12,218, doi:10.1073/pnas.1304328110.
36. Klemes, V. (1986), Delettantism in hydrology: Transition or destiny?, Water Resour. Res., 22, S177–S188.
37. Klemes, V. (1988), A hydrological perspective, J. Hydrol., 100, 3–28.
38. Koehler, J. J. (1993), The influence of prior beliefs on scientific judgments of evidence quality, Organ. Beh. Hum. Decis. Proces., 56, 28–55.
39. Lee, J., (1992), The education of hydrologists, Hydrol. Sci. J., 37, 285–289, doi:10.1080/02626669209492588.
40. Mahoney, M. J. (1977), Publication prejudices: An experimental study of confirmatory bias in the peer review system, Cognit. Ther. Res., 1, 161–175.
41. McDonnell, J. J. (2014), The two water worlds hypothesis: Ecohydrological separation of water between streams and trees?, WIREs Water, 1, 323–329, doi:10.1002/wat2.1027.
42. McKnight, D. M. (2017), Debates—Hypothesis testing in hydrology: A view from the field: The value of hydrologic hypotheses in designing field studies and interpreting the results to advance hydrology, Water Resour. Res., 53, doi:10.1002/2016WR020050.
43. Neuweiler, I. and R. Helmig (2017), Debates—Hypothesis testing in hydrology: A subsurface perspective, Water Resour. Res., 53, doi:10.1002/2016WR020047.
44. Nickerson, R. S. (1998), Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises, Rev. Gen. Psychol., 2, 175–220.
45. Simmons, J. P., L. D. Nelson, and U. Simonsohn (2011), False-positive psychology: Undisclosed flexibility in data collection and analysis allows presenting anything as significant, Psychol. Sci., 22, 1359–1366, doi:10.1177/0956797611417632.
46. Sklash, M. G., R. N. Farvolden, and P. Fritz (1976), A conceptual model of watershed response to rainfall, developed through the use of oxygen-18 as a natural tracer, Can. J. Earth Sci., 13(2), 271–283, doi:10.1139/e76-029.
47. Uhlenbrook, S. (2006), Catchment hydrology: A science in which all processes are preferential, Hydrol. Processes, 20, 3581–3585, doi:10.1002/hyp.6564.
48. Weiler, M., and K. Beven (2015), Do we need a community hydrological model?, Water Resour. Res., 51, 7777–7784, doi:10.1002/2014WR016731.
49. Westerberg, I. K., and C. Birkel (2015), Observational uncertainties in hypothesis testing: Investigating the hydrological functioning of a tropical catchment, Hydrol. Processes, 29, 4863–4879, doi:10.1002/hyp.10533.
50. Zehe, E., et al. (2014), HESS Opinions: From response units to functional units: A thermodynamic reinterpretation of the HRU concept to link spatial organization and functioning of intermediate scale catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4635–4655, doi:10.5194/hess-18-4635-2014.