Do we need a Community Hydrological Model?

Water Resources Research

Volumn 51, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 7777-7784

  Weiler, Markus ^a   Beven, Keith ^b,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF LAUSANNE   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

community model; hydrological model; model framework; perceptual models

Indexed keywords

CATCHMENTS; CLIMATE MODELS;

COMMUNITY MODEL; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; LUXEMBOURG; MODEL FRAMEWORK; PERCEPTUAL MODEL;

HYDROLOGY;

COMMUNITY RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION; PERCEPTION;

EID: 84944442249     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: 19447973     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/2014WR016731     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bachmair, S., and, M. Weiler, (2011), New dimensions of hillslope hydrology, in Forest Hydrology and Biogeochemistry: Synthesis of Research and Future Directions, edited by, D. Levia, D. Carlyle-Moses, and, T. Tanaka, pp. 455-481, Springer, Netherlands.
2. Bachmair, S., and, M. Weiler, (2013), Interactions and connectivity between runoff generation processes of different spatial scales, Hydrol. Processes, 28, 1916-1930, doi: 10.1002/hyp.9705.
3. Band, L. E., et al., (2014), Ecohydrological flow networks in the subsurface, Ecohydrology, 7, 1073-1078, doi: 10.1002/eco.1525.
4. Banta, E. R., M. C. Hill, and, M. G. McDonald, (2000), MODFLOW-2000: The US Geological Survey Modular Ground-Water Model: User Guide to Modularization Concepts and the Ground-Water Flow Process, 121 pp., U.S. Geol. Surv., Reston, Va.
5. Bell, V. A., A. L. Kay, R. G. Jones, R. J. Moore, and, N. S. Reynard, (2009), Use of soil data in a grid-based hydrological model to estimate spatial variation in changing flood risk across the UK, J. Hydrol., 377 (3), 335-350.
6. Bergstrand, M., S. Asp, and, G. Lindström, (2014), Nationwide hydrological statistics for Sweden with high resolution using the hydrological model S-HYPE, Hydrol. Res., 45 (4), 349-356.
7. Beven, K., P. Smith, I. Westerberg, and, J. Freer, (2012), Comment on "Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling" by M. P. Clark et al., Water Resour. Res., 48, W11801, doi: 10.1029/2012WR012282.
8. Beven, K. J., (1989), Changing ideas in hydrology: The case of physically based models, J. Hydrol., 105, 157-172.
9. Beven, K. J., (2000), Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 4 (2), 203-213.
10. Beven, K. J., (2006), The Holy Grail of Scientific Hydrology: Q t = H (S ← R ←) A as closure, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 10, 609-618.
11. Beven, K. J., (2007), Working towards integrated environmental models of everywhere: Uncertainty, data, and modelling as a learning process, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 11 (1), 460-467.
12. Beven, K. J., (2012), Rainfall-Runoff Modelling-The Primer, 2nd ed., Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester, U. K.
13. Beven, K. J., (2014), BHS Penman lecture: "Here we have a system in which liquid water is moving; let's just get at the physics of it" (Penman 1965), Hydrol. Res., 45 (6), 727-736, doi: 10.2166/nh.2014.130.
14. Beven, K. J., and, R. Alcock, (2012), Modelling everything everywhere: A new approach to decision-making for water management under uncertainty, Freshwater Biol., 57, 124-132, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2011.02592.x.
15. Beven, K. J., and, P. F. Germann, (2013), Macropores and water flow in soils revisited, Water Resour. Res., 49, 3071-3092, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20156.
16. Beven, K. J., D. T. Leedal, and, S. McCarthy, (2014), Framework for assessing uncertainty in fluvial flood risk mapping, CIRIA Rep. C721. [Available at http://www.ciria.org/Resources/Free-publications/fluvial-flood-risk-mapping.aspx.]
17. Beven, K. J., H. Cloke, F. Pappenberger, R. Lamb, and, N. Hunter, (2015), Hyperresolution information and hyperresolution ignorance in modelling the hydrology of the land surface, Sci. China Earth Sci., 58 (1), 25-35.
18. Blöschl, G., M. Sivapalan, and, T. Wagener, (Eds.) (2013), Runoff Prediction in Ungauged Basins: Synthesis Across Processes, Places and Scales, 490 pp., Cambridge Univ. Press, N. Y.
19. Blume, T., E. Zehe, and, A. Bronstert, (2009), Use of soil moisture dynamics and patterns at different spatio-temporal scales for the investigation of subsurface flow processes, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 1215-1233.
20. Bremicker, M., (2000), Das Wasserhaushaltsmodell LARSIM: Modellgrundlagen und Anwendungsbeispiele, Inst. for Hydrol., Univ. Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau, Germany.
21. Buytaert, W., (2013), TOPMODEL: Implementation of the Hydrological Model TOPMODEL in R. R Package Version 0.7. 2-2, London, GB.
22. Clark, M. P., A. G. Slater, D. E. Rupp, R. A. Woods, J. A. Vrugt, H. V. Gupta, T. Wagener, and, L. E. Hay, (2008), Framework for Understanding Structural Errors (FUSE): A modular framework to diagnose differences between hydrological models, Water Resour. Res., 44, W00B02, doi: 10.1029/2007WR006735.
23. Clark, M. P., D. Kavetski, and, F. Fenicia, (2011), Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modelling, Water Resour. Res., 47, W09301, doi: 10.1029/2010WR009827.
24. Clark, M. P., D. Kavetski, and, F. Fenicia, (2012), Reply to comment by K. Beven et al. on "Pursuing the method of multiple working hypotheses for hydrological modeling", Water Resour. Res., 48, W11802, doi: 10.1029/2012WR012547.
25. Clark, M. P., et al., (2015a), A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 1. Modeling concept, Water Resour. Res., 51, 2498-2514, doi: 10.1002/2015WR017198.
26. Clark, M. P., et al., (2015b), A unified approach for process-based hydrologic modeling: 2. Model implementation and case studies, Water Resour. Res., 51, 2515-2542, doi: 10.1002/2015WR017200.
27. Crawford, N. H., and, S. J. Burges, (2004). History of the Stanford watershed model, Water Resour. Impact, 6 (2), 1959-1961.
28. Dunne, T., (1983), Relation of field studies and modeling in the prediction of storm runoff, J. Hydrol., 65, 25-48.
29. Emanuel, R. E., A. G. Hazen, B. L. McGlynn, and, K. G. Jencso, (2014), Vegetation and topographic influences on the connectivity of shallow groundwater between hillslopes and streams, Ecohydrology, 7, 887-895, doi: 10.1002/eco.1409.
30. Euser, T., H. C. Winsemius, M. Hrachowitz, F. Fenicia, S. Uhlenbrook, and, H. H. G. Savenije, (2013), A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17 (5), 1893-1912.
31. Famiglietti, J. S., L. Murdoch, V. Lakshmi, J. Arrigo, and, R. Hooper, (2011), Establishing a Framework for Community Modeling in Hydrologic Science-Report From the 3rd Workshop on a Community Hydrologic Modeling Platform (CHyMP): A Strategic and Implementation Plan, Beckman Cent. of the Natl. Acad., Univ. of Calif., Irvine, doi: 10.4211/techrpts.20110317.tr10.
32. Fenicia, F., D. Kavetski, and, H. H. G. Savenije, (2011), Elements of a flexible approach for conceptual hydrological modeling: 1. Motivation and theoretical development, Water Resour. Res., 47, W11510, doi: 10.1029/2010WR010174.
33. Flury, M., H. Flühler, W. A. Jury, and, J. Leuenberger, (1994), Susceptibility of soils to preferential flow of water: A field study, Water Resour. Res., 30 (7), 1945-1954.
34. Freeze, R. A., and, R. L. Harlan, (1969), Blueprint for a physically-based, digitally-simulated hydrologic response model, J. Hydrol., 9 (3), 237-258.
35. Fuka, D. R., M. T. Walter, C. MacAlister, T. S. Steenhuis, and, Z. M. Easton, (2014), SWATmodel: A multi-operating system, multi-platform SWAT model package in R, J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc., 50 (5), 1349-1353.
36. Gregersen, J., P. Gijsbers, and, S. Westen, (2007), OpenMI: Open modelling interface, J. Hydroinf., 9, 175-191.
37. Habets, F., et al., (2008), The SAFRAN-ISBA-MODCOU hydrometeorological model applied over France, J. Geophys. Res., 113, D06113, doi: 10.1029/2007JD008548.
38. Henriksen, H. J., L. Troldborg, P. Nyegaard, T. O. Sonnenborg, J. C. Refsgaard, and, B. Madsen, (2003), Methodology for construction, calibration and validation of a national hydrological model for Denmark, J. Hydrol., 280 (1), 52-71.
39. Højberg, A. L., L. Troldborg, S. Stisen, B. B. S. Christensen, and, H. J. Henriksen, (2013), Stakeholder driven update and improvement of a national water resources model, Environ. Modell. Software, 40, 202-213.
40. Hurrell, J. W., M. M. Holland, P. R. Gent, S. Ghan, J. E. Kay, P. J. Kushner, and, S. Marshall, (2013), The community earth system model: A framework for collaborative research, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 94 (9), 1339-1360.
41. Jencso, K. G., B. L. McGlynn, M. N. Gooseff, K. E. Bencala, and, S. M. Wondzell, (2010), Hillslope hydrologic connectivity controls riparian groundwater turnover: Implications of catchment structure for riparian buffering and stream water sources, Water Resour. Res., 46, W10424, doi: 10.1029/2009WR008818.
42. Lawrence, D. M., et al., (2011), Parameterization improvements and functional and structural advances in version 4 of the Community Land Model, J. Adv. Model. Earth Sys., 3, doi: 10.1029/2011MS000045.
43. Malagò, A., L. Pagliero, F. Bouraoui, and, M. Franchini, (2015), Comparing calibrated parameter sets of the SWAT model for the Scandinavian and Iberian peninsulas, Hydrol. Sci. J., 60 (5), 949-967, doi: 10.1080/02626667.2014.978332.
44. Maxwell, R. M., et al., (2014), ParFlow user's manual, Rep. GWMI 2014-01, 159 pp., Integrated Ground Water Model. Cent, Goldon, Colo.
45. McDonnell, J. J., and, K. J. Beven, (2014), Debates-The future of hydrological sciences: A (common) path forward? A call to action aimed at understanding velocities, celerities, and residence time distributions of the headwater hydrograph, Water Resour. Res., 50, 5342-5350, doi: 10.1002/2013WR015141.
46. Mendoza, P. A., M. P. Clark, M. Barlage, B. Rajagopalan, L. Samaniego, G. Abramowitz, and, H. Gupta, (2015), Are we unnecessarily constraining the agility of complex process-based models?, Water Resour. Res., 51, 716-728, doi: 10.1002/2014WR015820.
47. Metcalfe, P., K. J. Beven, and, J. Freer, (2015), Dynamic top model: A new implementation in R and its sensitivity to time and space steps, Environ. Modell. Software, 72, 155-172, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.06.010.
48. Mizukami, N., and, M. B. Smith, (2012), Analysis of inconsistencies in multi-year gridded quantitative precipitation estimate over complex terrain and its impact on hydrologic modeling, J. Hydrol., 428, 129-141.
49. Newman, A. J., M. P. Clark, A. Winstral, D. Marks, and, M. Seyfried, (2014), The use of similarity concepts to represent subgrid variability in land surface models: Case study in a snowmelt-dominated watershed, J. Hydrometeorol., 15 (5), 1717-1738.
50. Niu, G. Y., et al., (2011), The community Noah land surface model with multiparameterization options (Noah-MP): 1. Model description and evaluation with local-scale measurements, J. Geophys. Res., 116, D12109, doi: 10.1029/2010JD015139.
51. Pappenberger, F., J. Bartholmes, J. Thielen, H. L. Cloke, R. Buizza, and, A. de Roo, (2008), New dimensions in early flood warning across the globe using grand-ensemble weather predictions, Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L10404, doi: 10.1029/2008GL033837.
52. Peckham, S. D., and, J. L. Goodall, (2013), Driving plug-and-play models with data from web services: A demonstration of interoperability between CSDMS and CUAHSI-HIS, Comput. Geosci., 53, 154-161.
53. Refsgaard, J. C., B. Storm, and, V. P. Singh, (1995), MIKE SHE, in Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, pp. 809-846, Water Resources Publications, Colo.
54. Reggiani, P., S. M. Hassanizadeh, M. Sivapalan, and, W. G. Gray, (1999), A unifying framework for watershed thermodynamics: Constitutive relationships, Adv. Water Resour., 23, 15-39.
55. Reggiani, P., M. Sivapalan, and, S. M. Hassanizadeh, (2000), Conservation equations governing hillslope responses: Exploring the physical basis of water balance, Water Resour. Res., 36 (7), 1845-1863.
56. Seibert, J., and, J. J. McDonnell, (2002), On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration, Water Resour. Res., 38 (11), 1241, doi: 10.1029/2001WR000978.
57. Silberstein, R. P., (2006), Hydrological models are so good, do we still need data?, Environ. Modell. Software, 21 (9), 1340-1352.
58. Šimůnek, J., M. T. van Genuchten, and, M. Šejna, (2008), Development and applications of the HYDRUS and STANMOD software packages and related codes, Vadose Zone J., 7 (2), 587-600.
59. Skamarock, W. C., and, J. B. Klemp, (2008), A time-split nonhydrostatic atmospheric model for weather research and forecasting applications, J. Comput. Phys., 227 (7), 3465-3485.
60. Smith, T., L. Marshall, B. McGlynn, and, K. Jencso, (2013), Using field data to inform and evaluate a new model of catchment hydrologic connectivity, Water Resour. Res., 49, 6834-6846, doi: 10.1002/wrcr.20546.
61. Strömqvist, J., B. Arheimer, J. Dahné, C. Donnelly, and, G. Lindström, (2012), Water and nutrient predictions in ungauged basins: Set-up and evaluation of a model at the national scale, Hydrol. Sci. J., 57 (2), 229-247.
62. Therrien, R., R. G. McLaren, E. A. Sudicky, and, S. M. Panday, (2010), HydroGeoSphere: A Three-Dimensional Numerical Model Describing Fully-Integrated Subsurface and Surface Flow and Solute Transport, Groundwater Simul. Group, Univ. of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ont.
63. Thielen, J., J. Bartholmes, M.-H. Ramos, and, A. de Roo, (2009), The European Flood Alert System-Part 1: Concept and development, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 125-140.
64. Tromp-van Meerveld, I., and, M. Weiler, (2008), Hillslope dynamics modeled with increasing complexity, J. Hydrol., 361 (1-2), 24-40.
65. Vitolo, C., Y. Elkhatib, D. Reusser, C. J. Macleod, and, W. Buytaert, (2015), Web technologies for environmental Big Data, Environ. Modell. Software, 63, 185-198, doi: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.10.007.
66. Weiler, M., and, F. Naef, (2003), An experimental tracer study of the role of macropores in infiltration in grassland soils, Hydrol. Processes, 17 (2), 477-493.
67. Wilkinson, M. E., et al., (2015), A cloud based tool for knowledge exchange on local scale flood risk using land management scenarios, J. Environ. Manage., 161, 38-50.
68. Wood, E. F., et al., (2011), Hyperresolution global land surface modeling: Meeting a grand challenge for monitoring Earth's terrestrial water, Water Resour. Res., 47, W05301, doi: 10.1029/2010WR010090.
69. Zehe, E., et al., (2014), HESS opinions: From response units to functional units: A thermodynamic reinterpretation of the HRU concept to link spatial organization and functioning of intermediate scale catchments, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 18, 4635-4655, doi: 10.5194/hess-18-4635-2014.