Erratum to: SWITCH: Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: Evidence from a randomized experiment (BMC Public Health (2015) 15 (1207) DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2541-4);Highlighting consensus among medical scientists increases public support for vaccines: Evidence from a randomized experiment Health behavior, health promotion and society

BMC Public Health

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 1-2

  Van Der Linden, Sander L ^a   Clarke, Chris E ^b   Maibach, Edward W ^b  

^a PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VACCINE;

ADULT; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CHILD; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINORITY GROUP; PARENT; PROCEDURES; PSYCHOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; TREATMENT REFUSAL; VACCINATION;

ADULT; CHILD; CONSENSUS; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MINORITY GROUPS; PARENTS; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; TREATMENT REFUSAL; VACCINATION; VACCINES;

EID: 85016519697     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4198-7     Document Type: Erratum

References (25)

1. CDC Global Health - Vaccines and Immunization. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/globalhealth/immunization/.
2. Whitney CG, Zhou F, Singleton J, Schuchat A. Benefits from immunization during the vaccines for children program era - United States, 1994-2013. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(16):352-55.
3. Gust D, Weber D, Weintraub E, Kennedy A, Soud F, Burns A. Physicians who do and do not recommend children get all vaccinations. J Health Commun. 2008;13(6):573-82.
4. Pew Research Center. 2015. 'Public and Scientists' views on Science and Society. Available from: http://www.pewinternet.org/2015/01/29/public-and-scientists-views-on-science-and-society/.
5. Kennedy A, Basket M, Sheedy K. Vaccine attitudes, concerns, and information sources reported by parents of young children: results from the 2009 HealthStyles survey. Pediatrics. 2011;127:S92-9.
6. Gallup Poll. 2015. Available from: http://www.gallup.com/poll/181844/percentage-saying-vaccines-vital-dips-slightly.aspx.
7. Kempe A, O'Leary ST, Kennedy A, Crane LA, Allison MA, Beaty BL, et al. Physician response to parental requests to spread out the recommended vaccine schedule. Pediatrics. 2015;135(4):666-77.
8. Gellin BG, Maibach EW, Marcuse EK. Do parents understand immunizations? A national telephone survey. Pediatrics. 2000;106(5):1097-102.
9. Sadaf A, Richards JL, Glanz J, Salmon DA, Omer SB. A systematic review of interventions for reducing parental vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine. 2013;31(40):4293-304.
10. Dubé E, Gagnon D, MacDonald NE. Strategies intended to address vaccine hesitancy: Review of published reviews. Vaccine. 2015;33(34):4191-203.
11. Nyhan B, Reifler J, Richey S, Freed GL. Effective messages in vaccine promotion: a randomized trial. Pediatrics. 2014;133(4):e835-42.
12. Bedford H. Pro-vaccine messages may be counterproductive among vaccine-hesitant parents. Evid Based Med. 2014;19(6):219.
13. Kahan DM. A risky science communication environment for vaccines. Science. 2013;342(6154):53-4.
14. Dixon G, Clarke C. The effect of falsely balanced reporting of the autism-vaccine controversy on vaccine safety perceptions and behavioral intentions. Health Educ Res. 2013;28(2):352-9.
15. Clarke CE, Dixon GN, Holton A, McKeever BW. Including "Evidentiary Balance" in news media coverage of vaccine risk. Health Commun. 2015;30(5):461-72.
16. Clarke CE, Holton A, McKeever B, Dixon G. The influence of weight-of-evidence messages on (vaccine) attitudes: a sequential mediation model. J Health Commun. 2015;20(11):1302-9.
17. Lewandowsky S, Gignac GE, Vaughan S. The pivotal role of perceived scientific consensus in acceptance of science. Nat Clim Change. 2012;3:399-404.
18. van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW. The scientific consensus on climate change as a gateway belief: Experimental evidence. PLoS One. 2015;10(2), e0118489.
19. van der Linden SL, Leiserowitz AA, Feinberg GD, Maibach EW. How to communicate the scientific consensus on climate change: plain facts, pie charts or metaphors? Clim Change. 2014;126(1-2):255-62.
20. Myers TA, Maibach E, Peters E, Leiserowitz A. Simple messages help set the record straight about scientific agreement on human-caused climate change: the results of two experiments. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0120985.
21. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gossling S. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality data? Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6(1):3-5.
22. Mason W, Suri M. Conducting behavioral research on Amazon's Mechanical Turk. Behav Res Methods. 2012;44(1):1-23.
23. Lewandowsky S, Ecker UKH, Seifert CM, Schwartz N, Cook J. Misinformation and its correction: continued influence and successful debiasing. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012;13(3):106-31.
24. Maibach E. Knowing our options for setting the record straight, when doing so is particularly important. Psychol Sci Public Interest. 2012;13(3):105.
25. Cohen D. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Erlbaum; 1988.