Randomised controlled trial: Pro-vaccine messages may be counterproductive among vaccine-hesitant parents

Evidence-Based Medicine

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2014, Pages 219-

  Bedford, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEASLES MUMPS RUBELLA VACCINE;

ARTICLE; EPIDEMIC; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; VACCINATION; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH PROMOTION; MALE; PARENT;

FEMALE; HEALTH EDUCATION; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HEALTH PROMOTION; HUMANS; MALE; MEASLES-MUMPS-RUBELLA VACCINE; PARENTS; VACCINATION;

EID: 84911404732     PISSN: 13565524     EISSN: 14736810     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/ebmed-2014-110037     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Meszaros JR, Asch DA, Baron J, et al. Cognitive processes and the decisions of some parents to forego pertussis vaccination for their children. J Clin Epidemiol 1996;49:697-703.
2. Sadaf A, Richards JL, Glanz J, et al. A systematic review of interventions for reducing parental vaccine refusal and vaccine hesitancy. Vaccine 2013;31:4293-304.
3. Benin AL, Wisler-Scher DJ, Colson E, et al. Qualitative analysis of mothers' decision-making about vaccines for infants: the importance of trust. Pediatrics 2006;117:1532-41.
4. Gust DA, Darling N, Kennedy A, et al . Parents with doubts about vaccines: which vaccines and reasons why. Pediatrics 2008;122:718-25.
5. Leask J, Kinnersley P, Jackson C, et al. Communicating with parents about vaccination: a framework for health professionals. BMC Pediatr 2012;12:154.