Including “Evidentiary Balance” in News Media Coverage of Vaccine Risk

Health Communication

Volumn 30, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 461-472

  Clarke, Christopher E ^a   Dixon, Graham N ^b   Holton, Avery ^c   McKeever, Brooke Weberling ^d  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

VACCINE;

AUTISTIC DISORDER; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; MASS MEDIUM; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PROCEDURES; PUBLISHING; RISK; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UNCERTAINTY;

AUTISTIC DISORDER; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEALTH COMMUNICATION; HUMANS; JOURNALISM, MEDICAL; MASS MEDIA; RISK; UNCERTAINTY; VACCINES;

EID: 84923513317     PISSN: 10410236     EISSN: 15327027     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2013.867006     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Afifi, W. A., & Weiner, J. L. (2004). Toward a theory of motivated information management. Communication Theory, 14, 167–190.
2. Anderson, A. A., Brossard, D., Scheufele, D. A., Xenos, M. A., & Ladwig, P. (2014). The “nasty effect”: Online incivility and risk perceptions of emerging technologies. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19, 373–387. doi:10.1111/jcc4.12009
3. Bennett, W. L. (1996). An introduction to journalism norms and representations in politics. Political Communication, 13, 373–384. doi:10.1080/10584609.1996.9963126
4. Boykoff, M., & Boykoff, J. (2004). Balance as bias: Global warming and the U.S. prestige press. Global Environmental Change, 15, 125–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2003.10.001.
5. Brashers, D. E. (2001). Communication and uncertainty management. Journal of Communication, 51, 477–497. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2001.tb02892.x.
6. Bristol, N., & Donnelly, J. (2011). Taking the temperature: The future of global health journalism. Menlo Park, CA: Kaiser Family Foundation.
7. Brewer, P. R., & Ley, B. L. (2014). Contested evidence: Exposure to competing scientific claims and public support for banning bisphenol A. Public Understanding of Science, 23, 395–410. doi:10.1177/0963662512449993.
8. Brossard, D., & Nisbet, M. C. (2007). Deference to scientific authority among a low information public: Understanding U.S. opinion on agricultural biotechnology. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 19, 24–52. doi:10.1093/ijpor/edl003.
9. Clarke, C. (2008). A question of balance: The autism–vaccine controversy in the British and American elite press. Science Communication, 30, 77–107. doi:10.1177/1075547008320262
10. Corbett, J. B., & Durfee, J. L. (2004). Testing public (un)certainty of science: Media representations of global warming. Science Communication, 26, 129–151. doi:10.1177/1075547004270234.
11. Dixon, G., & Clarke, C. (2013). Heightening uncertainty around certain science: Media coverage, false balance, and the autism–vaccine controversy. Science Communication, 35, 358–382. doi:10.1177/1075547012458290
12. Druckman, J. N. (2012). The politics of motivation. Critical Review, 24, 199–216. doi:10.1080/08913811.2012.711022.
13. Dunwoody, S. (1999). Scientists, journalists, and the meaning of uncertainty. In S. M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, & C. L. Rogers (Eds.), Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science (pp. 59–79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Dunwoody, S. (2005). Weight-of-evidence reporting; What is it? Why use it? Retrieved from http://www.nieman.harvard.edu/reportsitem.aspx?id=100595
15. Durham, M. G. (1998). On the relevance of standpoint epistemology to the practice of journalism: The case of “strong objectivity.” Communication Theory, 8, 117–140. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2885.1998.tb00213.x
16. Entman, R., (1989). Democracy without citizens: Media and the decay of American politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
17. Frewer, L. J., Miles, S., Brennan, M., Kuznesof, S., Ness, M., & Ritson, C. (2002). Public preferences for informed choice under conditions of risk uncertainty. Public Understanding of Science, 11, 363–372. doi:10.1088/0963-6625/11/4/304
18. Friedman, S.M., Dunwoody, S., & Rogers, C.L. (Eds.). (1999). Communicating uncertainty: Media coverage of new and controversial science. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
19. Gans, H. (1979). Deciding what’s news. New York, NY: Pantheon.
20. Garrett, R. K. (2009). Politically motivated reinforcement seeking: Reframing the selective exposure debate. Journal of Communication, 59, 676–699. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01452.x.
21. Gerber, J. S., & Offit, P.A. (2009). Vaccines and autism: A tale of shifting hypotheses. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 48, 456–461. doi:10.1086/596476.
22. Giannoulis, C., Botetzagias, I., & Skanavis, C. (2010). Newspaper reporters’ priorities and beliefs about enviornmental journalism: An application of Q-methodology. Science Communication, 32, 425–466. doi:10.1177/1075547010364927
23. Goodlee, F., Smith, J., & Marcovitch, H. (2011). Wakefield’s article linking MMR vaccine and autism was fraudulent. British Medical Journal, 342, 64–66. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c7452
24. Greer, C. F., & Ferguson, D. A. (2011). Using Twitter for promotion and branding: A content analysis of local television Twitter sites. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 55, 37–41. doi:10.1080/08838151.2011.570824
25. Griffin, R. J., Neuwirth, K., Dunwoody, S., & Giese, J. (2004). Information sufficiency and risk communication. Media Psychology, 6, 23–61. doi:10.1207/s1532785xmep0601_2
26. Han, P. K. J. (2013). Conceptual, methodological, and ethical problems in communicating uncertainty in clinical evidence. Medical Care Research and Review, 70S, 14S–36S. doi:10.1177/1077558712459361
27. Hayes, A. F. (2013). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
28. Holton, A., & Lewis, S. (2011). Journalists, social media, and the use of humor on Twitter. Electronic Journal of Communication, 21, 1–21. Retrieved from http://www.cios.org/EJCPUBLIC/021/1/021121.html
29. Holton, A., Baek, K., Coddington, M., & Yaschur, C. (2014). Seeking and sharing: Motivations for linking on Twitter. Communication Research Reports, 32, 33–40. doi:10.1080/08824096.2013.843165.
30. Jensen, J. (2008). Scientific uncertainty in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of hedging on scientists’ and journalists’ credibility. Human Communication Research, 34, 347–369. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2958.2008.00324.x.
31. Jensen, J. D., Carcioppolo, N., King, A. J., Bernat, J. K., Davis, L., Yale, R., … Smith, J. (2011). Including limitations in news coverage of cancer research: Effects of news hedging on fatalism, medical skepticism, patient trust, and backlash. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 486–503. doi:10.1080/10810730.2010.546491
32. Jensen, J. D., & Hurley, R. J. (2012). Conflicting stories about public scientific controversies: Effects of news convergence and divergence on scientist’s credibility. Public Understanding of Science, 21, 689–704. doi:10.1177/0963662510387759.
33. Kennedy, A., LaVail, K., Nowak, G., Basket, M., & Landry, S. (2011). Confidence about vaccines in the United States: Understanding parents’ perceptions. Health Affairs, 30, 1151–1159. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0396
34. Mebane, F., Temin, S., & Parvanta, C. F. (2003). Communicating anthrax in 2001: A comparison of CDC information and print media accounts. Journal of Health Communication, 8, 50–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713851970.
35. Powell, M., Dunwoody, S., Griffin, R., & Neuwirth, K. (2007). Exploring lay uncertainty about an environmental health risk. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 23–343. doi:10.1177/0963662507074491
36. Ryan, M. (2001). Journalistic ethics, objectivity, existential journalism, standpoint epistemology, and public journalism. Journal of Mass Media Ethics, 16, 3–22. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327728JMME1601_2
37. Schmitt, K. M., & Gunther, A. C. (2004). Why partisans see the media as biased. Communication Research, 31, 623–641. doi:10.1177/0093650204269390