Multivariate sensitivity analysis based on the direction of eigen space through principal component analysis

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 165, Issue , 2017, Pages 1-10

  Xiao, Sinan ^a   Lu, Zhenzhou ^a   Xu, Liyang ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN POLYTECHNICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Eigen space; Hydrological model; Multivariate outputs; Principal component analysis; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; MULTIVARIANT ANALYSIS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

CO-ORDINATE SYSTEM; DIFFERENT EFFECTS; EIGEN SPACE; ENVIRONMENTAL MODEL; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MULTIVARIATE OUTPUTS; PRINCIPAL COMPONENTS; SENSITIVITY INDICES;

PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 85015867183     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2017.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. [1] Harlin, J., Kung, C.-S., Parameter uncertainty and simulation of design floods in Sweden. J Hydrol 137:1 (1992), 209–230.
2. [2] Seibert, J., Estimation of parameter uncertainty in the HBV model. Nord Hydrol 28 (1997), 247–262.
3. [3] Iman, R.L., Johnson, M.E., Watson, C.C., Uncertainty analysis for computer model projections of hurricane losses. Risk Anal 25:5 (2005), 1299–1312.
4. [4] Borgonovo, E., et al. Comparison of global sensitivity analysis techniques and importance measures in PSA. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 79:2 (2003), 175–185.
5. [5] Hofer, E., Sensitivity analysis in the context of uncertainty analysis for computationally intensive models. Comput Phys Commun 117:1–2 (1999), 21–34.
6. [6] Saltelli, A., Sensitivity analysis: could better methods be used*. J Geophys Res 104 (1999), 3789–3793.
7. [7] Iman, R.L., Johnson, M.E., Watson, C.C., Sensitivity analysis for computer model projections of hurricane losses. Risk Anal 25:5 (2005), 1277–1297.
8. [8] Saltelli, A., et al. Global sensitivity analysis. The Primer, 2008, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
9. [9] Razavi, S., Gupta, H.V., What do we mean by sensitivity analysis* The need for comprehensive characterization of “global” sensitivity in Earth and Environmental systems models. Water Resour Res 51:5 (2015), 3070–3092.
10. [10] Morris, M.D., Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments. Technometrics 33:2 (1991), 161–174.
11. [11] Borgonovo, E., Plischke, E., Sensitivity analysis: a review of recent advances. Eur J Oper Res 248:3 (2016), 869–887.
12. [12] Saltelli, A., Sensitivity analysis for importance assessment. Risk Anal 22:3 (2002), 579–590.
13. [13] Saltelli, A., Tarantola, S., On the relative importance of input factors in Mathematical models: safety assessment for nuclear waste disposal. J Am Stat Assoc 97:459 (2002), 702–709.
14. [14] Herman JD. et al., Technical note: Method of Morris effectively reduces the computational demands of global sensitivity analysis for distributed watershed models. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions; 2013.
15. [15] Herman, J.D., et al. From maps to movies: high resolution time-varying sensitivity analysis for spatially distributed watershed models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 10:12 (2013), 5109–5125.
16. [16] Frey, H.C., Patil, S.R., Identification and review of sensitivity analysis methods. Risk Anal 22:3 (2002), 553–578.
17. [17] Patil, S.R., Frey, H.C., Comparison of sensitivity analysis methods based on applications to a food safety risk assessment model. Risk Anal 24:3 (2004), 573–585.
18. [18] Cuntz, M., et al. Computationally inexpensive identification of noninformative model parameters by sequential screening. Water Resour Res 51:8 (2015), 6417–6441.
19. [19] Borgonovo, E., Peccati, L., Uncertainty and global sensitivity analysis in the evaluation of investment projects. Int J Prod Econ 104:1 (2006), 62–73.
20. [20] Lamboni, M., et al. Multivariate global sensitivity analysis for dynamic crop models. Field Crops Res 113:3 (2009), 312–320.
21. [21] Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., Saltelli, A., An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models. Environ Model Softw 22:10 (2007), 1509–1518.
22. [22] Sobol', I.M., Global sensitivity indices for nonlinear mathematical models and their Monte Carlo estimates. Math Comput Simul 55:1–3 (2001), 271–280.
23. [23] Homma, T., Saltelli, A., Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of nonlinear models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 52:1 (1996), 1–17.
24. [24] Sobol', I.M., Sensitivity analysis for non-linear mathematical models. Math Model Comput Exp 1 (1993), 407–414.
25. [25] Sobol’, I.M., Kucherenko, S., Derivative based global sensitivity measures and their link with global sensitivity indices. Math Comput Simul 79:10 (2009), 3009–3017.
26. [26] Sobol', I.M., Kucherenko, S., A new derivative based importance criterion for groups of variables and its link with the global sensitivity indices. Comput Phys Commun 181:7 (2010), 1212–1217.
27. [27] Borgonovo, E., A new uncertainty importance measure. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 92:6 (2007), 771–784.
28. [28] Cui, L., Lü, Z., Zhao, X., Moment-independent importance measure of basic random variable and its probability density evolution solution. Sci China Technol Sci 53:4 (2010), 1138–1145.
29. [29] Li, L., et al. Moment-independent importance measure of basic variable and its state dependent parameter solution. Struct Saf 38 (2012), 40–47.
30. [30] Li, L., Lu, Z., Wu, D., A new kind of sensitivity index for multivariate output. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 147 (2016), 123–131.
31. [31] Lamboni, M., Monod, H., Makowski, D., Multivariate sensitivity analysis to measure global contribution of input factors in dynamic models. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 96:4 (2011), 450–459.
32. [32] Garcia-Cabrejo, O., Valocchi, A., Global sensitivity analysis for multivariate output using polynomial chaos expansion. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 126 (2014), 25–36.
33. [33] Campbell, K., McKay, M.D., Williams, B.J., Sensitivity analysis when model outputs are functions. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91:10–11 (2006), 1468–1472.
34. [34] Jolliffe, I.T., Principal component analysis. 2002, Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
35. [35] Härdle, W.K., Simar, L., Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 2007, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 458.
36. [36] Gamboa, F., et al. Sensitivity indices for multivariate outputs. Comptes Rendus Math 351:7–8 (2013), 307–310.
37. [37] Devore, J.L., Berk, K.N., The Analysis of Variance, in modern mathematical statistics with applications. 2012, Springer New York, New York, NY, 552–612.
38. [38] Sobol', I.M., On the distribution of points in a cube and the approximate evaluation of integrals. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 7:4 (1967), 86–112.
39. [39] Sobol', I.M., Uniformly distributed sequences with additional uniformity properties. USSR Comput Math Math Phys 16:5 (1976), 236–242.
40. [40] Sobol, I.M., et al., Construction and Comparison of High-Dimensional Sobol' Generators. Wilmott, 2011; 2011(56): p. 64–79.
41. [41] Hall, P., Hosseini-Nasab, M., On properties of functional principal components analysis. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser B (Stat Methodol) 68:1 (2006), 109–126.
42. [42] Dauxois, J., Pousse, A., Romain, Y., Asymptotic theory for the principal component analysis of a vector random function: some applications to statistical inference. J Multivar Anal 12:1 (1982), 136–154.
43. [43] Bergström S. The HBV model - its structure and applications. in SMHI Hydrology, RH. Norrköping; 1992.
44. [44] Kollat, J.B., Reed, P.M., Wagener, T., When are multiobjective calibration trade-offs in hydrologic models meaningful*. Water Resour Res, 48(3), 2012 [p. n/a-n/a].
45. [45] Bergström, S., The development of a snow routine for the HBV-2 model. Hydrol Res 6:2 (1975), 73–92.
46. [46] Abebe, N.A., Ogden, F.L., Pradhan, N.R., Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis of the conceptual HBV rainfall–runoff model: implications for parameter estimation. J Hydrol 389:3–4 (2010), 301–310.
47. [47] van Werkhoven, K., et al. Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models. Adv Water Resour 32:8 (2009), 1154–1169.
48. [48] Pianosi, F., Sarrazin, F., Wagener, T., A Matlab toolbox for Global sensitivity analysis. Environ Model Softw 70 (2015), 80–85.
49. [49] Wagener, T., et al. A framework for development and application of hydrological models. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci Discuss 5:1 (2001), 13–26.
50. [50] Sorooshian, S., Gupta, V.K., Fulton, J.L., Evaluation of Maximum Likelihood Parameter estimation techniques for conceptual rainfall-runoff models: influence of calibration data variability and length on model credibility. Water Resour Res 19:1 (1983), 251–259.