From maps to movies: High-resolution time-varying sensitivity analysis for spatially distributed watershed models

Hydrology and Earth System Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 12, 2013, Pages 5109-5125

  Herman, J D ^a   Kollat, J B ^b   Reed, P M ^a   Wagener, T ^c  

^a Cornell University   (United States)

^b The Pennsylvania State University   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGIC MODEL; DISTRIBUTED WATERSHED MODELS; HIGH-RESOLUTION MODELS; NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICES; PARAMETER SENSITIVITIES; SPATIAL AND TEMPORAL RESOLUTIONS; SPATIALLY DISTRIBUTED MODELING; SPATIO-TEMPORAL SENSITIVITY;

SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION;

WATERSHEDS;

MAP; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELING; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; WATERSHED;

BLUE BASIN; OKLAHOMA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84890622237     PISSN: 10275606     EISSN: 16077938     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5194/hess-17-5109-2013     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alton, P., Mercado, L., and North, P.: A sensitivity analysis of the land-surface scheme JULES conducted for three forest biomes: Biophysical parameters, model processes, and meteorological driving data, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 20, GB1008, doi:10.1029/2005GB002653, 2006.
2. Bastidas, L., Hogue, T., Sorooshian, S., Gupta, H., and Shuttleworth, W.: Parameter sensitivity analysis for different complexity land surface models using multicriteria methods, J. Geophys. Res., 111, 20101, doi:10.1029/ 2005JD006377, 2006. (Pubitemid 44941261)
3. Burnash, R. and Singh, V.: The NWS River Forecast System-Catchment Modeling, in: Computer Models of Watershed Hydrology, 311-366, Water Resour. Publ., Littleton, Colorado, 1995.
4. Campolongo, F., Cariboni, J., and Saltelli, A.: An effective screening design for sensitivity analysis of large models, Environ. Modell. Softw., 22, 1509-1518, 2007. (Pubitemid 46561424)
5. Campolongo, F., Saltelli, A., and Cariboni, J.: From screening to quantitative sensitivity analysis, A unified approach, Computer Phys. Commun., 182, 978-988, 2011.
6. Carpenter, T. M., Georgakakos, K. P., and Sperfslagea, J. A.: On the parametric and NEXRAD-radar sensitivities of a distributed hydrologic model suitable for operational use, J. Hydrol., 253, 169-193, 2001. (Pubitemid 32996492)
7. Cloke, H., Pappenberger, F., and Renaud, J.: Multi-method global sensitivity analysis (MMGSA) for modelling floodplain hydrological processes, Hydrol. Process., 22, 1660-1674, 2008. (Pubitemid 351766945)
8. Cuo, L., Giambelluca, T. W., and Ziegler, A. D.: Lumped parameter sensitivity analysis of a distributed hydrological model within tropical and temperate catchments, Hydrol. Process., 25, 2405-2421, doi:10.1002/hyp.8017, 2011.
9. Demaria, E., Nijssen, B., and Wagener, T.: Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis of land surface parameters using the Variable Infiltration Capacity model, J. Geophys. Res., 112, D11113, doi:10.1029/2006JD007534, 2007. (Pubitemid 47287996)
10. Franchini, M., Wendling, J., Obled, C., and Todini, E.: Physical interpretation and sensitivity analysis of the TOPMODEL, J. Hydrol., 175, 293-338, 1996.
11. Freer, J., Beven, K., and Ambroise, B.: Bayesian estimation of uncertainty in runoff prediction and the value of data: An application of the GLUE approach, Water Resour. Res., 32, 2161-2173, 1996.
12. Gupta, H., Sorooshian, S., and Yapo, P.: Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Multiple and noncommensurable measures of information,Water Resour. Res., 34, 751-763, 1998. (Pubitemid 28159454)
13. Gupta, H.,Wagener, T., and Liu, Y.: Reconciling theory with observations: elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation, Hydrol. Process., 22, 3802-3813, 2008.
14. Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., and Martinez, G. F.: Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling, J. Hydrol., 377, 80-91, 2009.
15. Guse, B., Reusser, D. E., and Fohrer, N.: How to improve the representation of hydrological processes in SWAT for a lowland catchment-temporal analysis of parameter sensitivity and model performance, Hydrol. Process., doi:10.1002/hyp.9777, in press, 2013.
16. Hall, J., Tarantola, S., Bates, P., and Horritt, M.: Distributed sensitivity analysis of flood inundation model calibration, J. Hydraul. Eng., 131, 117-126, 2005. (Pubitemid 40191047)
17. Herman, J. D., Kollat, J. B., Reed, P. M., and Wagener, T.: Technical Note: Method of Morris effectively reduces the computational demands of global sensitivity analysis for distributed watershed models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 17, 2893-2903, doi:10.5194/hess-17-2893-2013, 2013a.
18. Herman, J., Reed, P., and Wagener, T.: Time-varying sensitivity analysis clarifies the effects of watershed model formulation on model behavior, Water Resour. Res., 49, 1400-1414, doi:10.1002/wrcr.20124, 2013b.
19. Hornberger, G. and Spear, R.: Approach to the preliminary analysis of environmental systems, J. Environ. Manage., 12, 7-18, 1981.
20. Koren, V., Reed, S., Smith, M., Zhang, Z., and Seo, D.-J.: Hydrology laboratory research modeling system (HL-RMS) of the US national weather service, J. Hydrol., 291, 297-318, 2004. (Pubitemid 38536861)
21. Moreda, F., Koren, V., Zhang, Z., Reed, S., and Smith, M.: Parameterization of distributed hydrological models: learning from the experiences of lumped modeling, J. Hydrol., 320, 218-237, 2006.
22. Morris, M. D.: Factorial Sampling Plans for Preliminary Computational Experiments, Technometrics, 33, 161-174, ArticleType: research-article/Full publication date: May, 1991/Copyright© 1991 American Statistical Association and American Society for Quality, 1991.
23. Muleta, M. and Nicklow, J.: Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model, J. Hydrol., 306, 127-145, 2005. (Pubitemid 40678746)
24. Pappenberger, F., Beven, K. J., Ratto, M., and Matgen, P.: Multi-method global sensitivity analysis of flood inundation models, Adv. Water Resour., 31, 1-14, 2008. (Pubitemid 350082670)
25. Pujol, G., Iooss, B., and Janon, A.: Sensitivity Analysis Package, available at: http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/sensitivity/index.html, R package version 1.7-0, 2013.
26. Reed, S., Koren, V., Smith, M., Zhang, Z., Moreda, F., Seo, D.-J., and DMIP Participants, a.: Overall distributed model intercomparison project results, J. Hydrol., 298, 27-60, 2004. (Pubitemid 39098767)
27. Reusser, D. and Zehe, E.: Inferring model structural deficits by analyzing temporal dynamics of model performance and parameter sensitivity, Water Resour. Res., 47, W07550, doi:10.1029/2010WR009946, 2011.
28. Reusser, D., Blume, T., Schaefli, B., and Zehe, E.: Analysing the temporal dynamics of model performance for hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 13, 999-1018, doi:10.5194/hess-13-999-2009, 2009.
29. Reusser, D., Buytaert, W., and Zehe, E.: Temporal dynamics of model parameter sensitivity for computationally expensive models with the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test, Water Resour. Res., 47, W07551, doi:10.1029/ 2010WR009947, 2011.
30. Rosolem, R., Gupta, H. V., Shuttleworth,W. J., Gonçalves, L. G. G., and Zeng, X.: Towards a comprehensive approach to parameter estimation in land surface parameterization schemes, Hydrol. Process., 27, 2075-2097, 2012.
31. Ruano, M., Ribes, J., Seco, A., and Ferrer, J.: An improved sampling strategy based on trajectory design for application of the Morris method to systems with many input factors, Environ. Modell. Softw., 37, 103-109, 2012.
32. Sieber, A. and Uhlenbrook, S.: Sensitivity analyses of a distributed catchment model to verify the model structure, J. Hydrol., 310, 216-235, 2005. (Pubitemid 40837293)
33. Smith, M. B., Seo, D.-J., Koren, V. I., Reed, S. M., Zhang, Z., Duan, Q., Moreda, F., and Cong, S.: The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): motivation and experiment design, J. Hydrol., 298, 4-26, 2004. (Pubitemid 39098766)
34. Smith, M. B., Koren, V., Reed, S., Zhang, Z., Zhang, Y., Moreda, F., Cui, Z., Mizukami, N., Anderson, E. A., and Cosgrove, B. A.: The distributed model intercomparison project-Phase 2: Motivation and design of the Oklahoma experiments, J. Hydrol., 418-419, 3-16, 2012.
35. Tang, Y., Reed, P., Van Werkhoven, K., and Wagener, T.: Advancing the identification and evaluation of distributed rainfall-runoff models using global sensitivity analysis, Water Resour. Res., 43, W06415, doi:10.1029/2006WR005813, 2007. (Pubitemid 47124438)
36. van Griensven, A., Meixner, T., Grunwald, S., Bishop, T., Diluzio, M., and Srinivasan, R.: A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models, J. Hydrol., 324, 10-23, 2006. (Pubitemid 43744502)
37. Van Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Tang, Y.: Characterization of watershed model behavior across a hydroclimatic gradient, Water Resour. Res., 44, W01429, doi:10.1029/2007WR006271, 2008a. (Pubitemid 351304154)
38. Van Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Tang, Y.: Rainfall characteristics define the value of streamflow observations for distributed watershed model identification, Geophys. Res. Lett, 35, L11403, doi:10.1029/2008GL034162, 2008b.
39. Van Werkhoven, K., Wagener, T., Reed, P., and Tang, Y.: Sensitivity-guided reduction of parametric dimensionality for multi-objective calibration of watershed models, Adv.Water Resour., 32, 1154-1169, 2009.
40. Wagener, T., Boyle, D. P., Lees, M. J., Wheater, H. S., Gupta, H. V., and Sorooshian, S.: A framework for development and application of hydrological models, Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci., 5, 13-26, doi:10.5194/hess-5-13-2001, 2001. (Pubitemid 32710655)
41. Wagener, T., McIntyre, N., Lees, M., Wheater, H., and Gupta, H.: Towards reduced uncertainty in conceptual rainfall-runoff modelling: Dynamic identifiability analysis, Hydrol. Process., 17, 455-476, 2003. (Pubitemid 36234589)
42. Wagener, T., Reed, P., van Werkhoven, K., Tang, Y., and Zhang, Z.: Advances in the identification and evaluation of complex environmental systems models, J. Hydroinform., 11, 266-281, 2009a.
43. Wagener, T., Werkhoven, K. v., Reed, P., and Tang, Y.: Multiobjective sensitivity analysis to understand the information content in streamflow observations for distributed watershed modeling, Water Resour. Res., 45, W02501, doi:10.1029/2008WR007347, 2009b.
44. Yatheendradas, S., Wagener, T., Gupta, H., Unkrich, C., Goodrich, D., Schaffner, M., and Stewart, A.: Understanding uncertainty in distributed flash flood forecasting for semiarid regions, Water Resour. Res., 44, W05S19, doi:10.1029/2007WR005940, 2008. (Pubitemid 351897353)
45. Zaehle, S., Sitch, S., Smith, B., and Hatterman, F.: Effects of parameter uncertainties on the modeling of terrestrial biosphere dynamics, Global Biogeochem. Cy., 19, GB3020, doi:10.1029/2004GB002395, 2005. (Pubitemid 41599683)