Sensitivity analysis: Could better methods be used?

Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres

Volumn 104, Issue D3, 1999, Pages 3789-3793

  Saltelli, Andrea ^a  

^a JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

METHODOLOGY; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS;

EID: 0033585967     PISSN: 01480227     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/1998JD100042     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Cacuci, D. G., Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems I. Nonlinear functional analysis approach, J. Math. Phys., 22(12), 2794-2802, 1981a.
2. Cacuci, D. G., Sensitivity theory for nonlinear systems II. Extensions to additional classes of response, J. Math. Phys, 22(12), 2803-2812, 1981b.
3. Campolongo, F., and A. Saltelli, Sensitivity Analysis of an environmental model. An application of different analysis methods, Reliability Eng Syst. Safety, 52(1), 49-69, 1997.
4. Campolongo, F., A. Saltelli, N. R. Jensen, J. Wilson, and J. Hjorth, The role of multiphase chemistry in the oxidation of dimethylsulphide (DMS). A latitude dependent analysis, J. Atmos. Chem., in press, 1998.
5. Capaldo, K. P., and S. N. Pandis, Dimethylsulfide chemistry in the remote marine atmosphere: Evaluation and sensitivity analysis of available mechanisms, J. Geophys. Res., 102(D19), 23,251-23,267, 1997.
6. Clegg, A., and R. Toumi, The sensitivity of sulphur dioxide oxidation in sea-salt to nitric acid and ammonia gas-phase concentrations J. Geophys. Res., 102(D19), 23,241-23,249, 1997.
7. Cukier, R. I., C. M. Fortuin, K. E. Schuler, A. G. Petschek, and J. H. Schaibly, Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients I. Theory, J. Chem. Phys., 59(8), 3873-3878, 1973.
8. Cukier, R. I., J. H. Schaibly, and K. E. Schuler, Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients III. Analysis of the approximations, J. Chem. Phys., 63(3), 1140-1149, 1975.
9. Draper, N. R., and H. Smith, Applied Regression Analysis, John Wiley, New York, 1981.
10. Fedra, K., G. Van Straten, and M. B. Beck, Uncertainty and arbitrariness in ecosystems modeling: a lake modeling example, Ecol. Modell., 13, 87-110, 1981.
11. Helton, J. C., Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for use in performance assessment for radioactive waste disposal, Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety, 42, 327-367, 1993.
12. Homma, T., and A. Saltelli, Importance measures in global sensitivity analysis of model output, Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety, 52(1), 1-17, 1996.
13. Iman, R. L., and J. C. Helton, A comparison of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, Rep. SAND 84-1461, Sandia Natl. Lab., 1985.
14. Iman, R. L., and J. C. Helton, An investigation of uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques for computer models, Risk Anal., 8(1), 71-90, 1988.
15. Iman, R. L., M. J. Shortencarier, and J. D. Johnson, A FORTRAN 77 program and user's guide for the calculation of partial correlation and standardized regression coefficients, Rep. SAND85-0044, Sandia Natl. Lab.,1985.
16. Kerminen, V-M., and A.S. Wexler, Growth behavior of the marine submicron boundary layer aerosol, J. Geophys. Res., 102(D15), 18, 813-18,825, 1997.
17. 2O system: their sensitivity to variations in environmental parameters and their application to a GCTM study, J. Geophys. Res., 102(D17), 21,221-21,237, 1997.
18. Koda, M., G. J. McRae, and J. H., Seinfeld, Automatic sensitivity analysis of kinetic mechanisms, Int. J. Chem. Kinet., 11, 427-444, 1979.
19. Kreidenweis, S. M., and Y. Zhang, The effect of clouds on aerosol and chemical species production and distribution, 2, Chemistry model description and sensitivity analysis, J. Geophys. Res., 102(D20), 23,867-23,882, 1997.
20. McRae, G. J., J. W. Tilden, and J. H. Seinfeld, , Global sensitivity analysis - A computational implementation of the Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST), Comput. Chem. Eng., 6(1), 15-25, 1982.
21. Morris, M. D., Factorial sampling plans for preliminary computational experiments, Technometrics, 33(2), 1991.
22. Rabitz, H., System analysis at molecular scale, Science, 246, 221-226, 1989.
23. 2O aerosols: Uncertainty analysis and experimental evaluation, J. Aerosol Sci., 23(1), 759-771, 1992.
24. Remedio, J. M., A. Saltelli, J. Hjorth, and J. Wilson, KIM - A chemical kinetics model of the OH- initiated oxidation of DMS in air: A Monte Carlo analysis of the latitude effect, EUR Rep. 16045 EN, Eur. Comm., Luxembourg 1994.
25. Saltelli, A., and R. Bolado, An alternative way to compute Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST), Comput. Stat. Data Anal., 26(4), 445-460, 1998.
26. Saltelli, A., and J. Hjorth, Uncertainty and sensitivity analyses of OH-initiated dimethylsulphide (DMS) oxidation kinetics, J. Atmos. Chem., 21, 187-221, 1995.
27. Saltelli, A., and I. M. Sobol', About the use of rank transformation in sensitivity analysis of model output, Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety, 50, 225-239, 1995.
28. Saltelli, A., S. Tarantola, and K. Chan, A quantitative, model independent method for global sensitivity analysis of model output, Technometrics, in press, 1998.
29. Schaibly, J. K., and K. E. Schuler, Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients II, Applications, J. Chem. Phys., 59(8), 3879-3888, 1973.
30. Sobol', I.M., Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models (in Russian), Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie, 2, 112-118, 1990, (Engl. Transl. Math. Modell. Comput. Exp., 1, 407-414, 1993).
31. Sobol', I.M., Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models (in Russian), Matematicheskoe Modelirovanie, 2, 112-118, 1990, (Engl. Transl. Math. Modell. Comput. Exp., 1, 407-414, 1993).
32. Special Issue on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, Reliability Eng. Syst. Safety, 52(1), 1-4, 1997.
33. Special Issue on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, J. Stat. Comput. Simul., 57(1-4), 1997.
34. Special Issue on Sensitivity Analysis of Model Output, Comput. Phys. Comm., in print, 1998.
35. Turanyi, T., Sensitivity analysis of complex kinetic systems: Tools and applications, J. Math. Chem., 5, 203-248, 1990.