Aptitude tests versus school exams as selection tools for higher education and the case for assessing educational achievement in context

Research Papers in Education

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 53-68

  Stringer, Neil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

A levels; Aptitude tests; Deprivation; Higher education; SAT; University admissions

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015800843     PISSN: 02671522     EISSN: 14701146     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02671520701651771     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Adelman, C. 1999. Answers in the tool box: Academie intensity, attendance patterns, and bachelor’s degree attainmen. Jessup, MD: Office of Educational Research and Improvement, US Department of Education. http://www.ed.gov/pubs/Toolbox/Title.html.
2. Admissions to Higher Education Steering Group. 2003. Consultation on key issues relating to fair admissions to higher education. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills Publications.
3. Admissions to Higher Education Steering Group. 2004. Fair admissions to higher education: Recommendations for good practice. Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills Publications.
4. Atkinson, R.C. 2001. Standardized tests and access to American universities. The 2001 Robert H. Atwell Distinguished Lecture delivered at the 83rd Annual Meeting of the American Council on Education, February 18, in Washington, DC. http://www.ucop.edu/news/sat/speech1.html.
5. BBC News. 2003. Q&A: University admissions, December 11. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/education/ 3309673.stm.
6. Benton, D., and G. Roberts. 1988. Effect of vitamin and mineral supplementation on intelligence of a sample of schoolchildren. The Lancet 331, no. 8578, January 23: 140-43.
7. Blair, A. 2005. A-level results to add pressure for university entrance tests. The Times, August 15. http:// www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/Hfe_and_style/education/article555396.ece.
8. Breslau, N., H. Chilcoat, J. DelDotto, P. Andreski, and G. Brown. 1996. Low birth weight and neurocognitive status at six years of age. Biological Psychiatry 40, no. 5: 389-97.
9. Brown, L., and E. Pollitt. 1996. Malnutrition, poverty and intellectual development. Scientific American 274: 38-43.
10. Choppin, B., and L. Orr. 1976. Aptitude testing at eighteen-plus. Windsor: NFER Publishing Co.
11. Choppin, B.H.L., L. Orr, P. Fara, S.D.M. Kurle, K.R. Fogelman, and G. James. 1972. After A-level? A study of the transition from school to higher education. Windsor: NFER Publishing Co.
12. Choppin, B.H.L., L. Orr, S.D.M. Kurle, P. Fara, and G. James. 1973. The predication of academic success. Windsor: NFER Publishing Co.
13. Clare, J. 1999. SAT—a simple way to grade students. Daily Telegraph, November 10.
14. Croxford, L. 2001. Socio-economic inequalities and educational attainment in Scotland. Social Justice Annual Report Scotland 2001. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive.
15. Department for Education & Skills (DfES). 2003. Wideningparticipation in higher education. Nottingham: DfES Publications.
16. Department for Education & Skills (DfES). 2005. Improving the higher education applications process: A consultation paper. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/consultations/conDetails.cfm?consultationId=1346.
17. Desforges, C., and A. Abouchaar. 2003. The impact of parental involvement, parental support and family education on pupil achievements and adjustment: A literature review (Research Report No. 433). Nottingham: Department for Education and Skills Publications. http://www.dfes.gov.uk/research/data/ uploadfiles/RR433.pdf.
18. Dhillon, D. 2005. Teachers’ estimates of candidates’ grades: Curriculum 2000 advanced level qualifications. British Educational Research Journal 31, no. 1, February: 69-88.
19. Gould, S.J. 1995. Curveball. In The bell curve wars: Race, intelligence, and the future of America, ed. S. Fraser. New York: Basic Books.
20. Gratz v. Bollinger. 2003. The bell curve wars: Race, intelligence, and the future of America 539 U.S. 244. Docket Number: 02-516. http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/case/ 1540/.
21. Grutter v. Bollinger. 2003. The bell curve wars: Race, intelligence, and the future of America 539 U.S. 244. Docket Number: 02-241. http://www.oyez.org/oyez/resource/ case/1541/.
22. Gryphon, M. 2005. The affirmative action myth. Policy Analysis 540, April 6. Washington, DC: CATO Institute.
23. Herrnstein, R., and C. Murray. 1994. The bell curve: Intelligence and class structure in American life. New York: The Free Press.
24. Hutchison, D., and E. Scott. 2003. Using national value-added datasets to explore the impact of school and pupil factors on progress from Key Stage 2 to Key Stage 4. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference, September 11-13, at Heriot-Watt Univ., Edinburgh. http:// www.nfer.ac.uk/publications/other-publications/conference-papers/using-national-value-added-datasets-to-explore-the-impact-of-school-and-pupil-factors-on-progress-from-key-stage-2-to-key-stage-4.cfm.
25. Ivanovic, D.M., B.P. Leiva, H.T. Pérez, A.F. Almagià, T.D. Toro, M.S.C. Urrutia, N.B. Inzunza, and E.O. Bosch. 2002. Nutritional status, brain development and scholastic achievement of Chilean high-school graduates from high and low intellectual quotient and socio-economic status. British Journal of Nutrition 87: 81-92.
26. Ivanovic, D., B. Leiva, H. Pérez, N. Inzunza, A. Almagià, T. Toro, M.S. Urrutia, J. Cervilla, and E. Bosch. 2000. Long-term effects of severe undernutrition during the first year of life on brain development and learning in Chilean high school graduates. Nutrition 16: 1056-63.
27. Jencks, C., and J. Crouse. 1982. Should we relabel the SAT … or replace it? Phi Delta Kappan 63: 659-63.
28. Lohman, D.F. 2002. Aptitude for college: The importance of reasoning tests for minority admissions. Revision of comments on Dr. Atkinson’s proposal given at Rethinking the SAT: The future of stan-dardized testing in university admissions, November 16, 2001, at the Univ. of California, Santa Barbara. Univ. of Iowa, draft of October 3, 2002.
29. Lohman, D.F. 2005a. An aptitude perspective on talent identification: Implications for the identification of academically gifted minority students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted 28: 333-60.
30. Lohman, D.F. 2005b. The role of non-verbal ability tests in identifying academically gifted students: An aptitude perspective. Gifted Child Quarterly 49: 111-38.
31. McDonald, A.S., P.E. Newton, and C. Whetton. 2001. A pilot of aptitude testing for university entrance. Slough: NFER.
32. McDonald, A.S., P.E. Newton, C. Whetton, and P. Benefield. 2000. Aptitude testing for university entrance: A literature review. Slough: NFER.
33. McGaw, B., C. Gipps, and R. Godber. 2004. Examination standards: Report of the independent committee to QCA. London: Qualifications and Curriculum Authority.
34. McManus, I.C., E. Smithers, P. Partridge, A. Keeling, and P.R. Fleming. 2003. A levels and intelligence as predictors of medical careers in UK doctors: 20 year prospective study. British Medical Journal 327: 139-42.
35. Powney, J. 1997. Trends in gender and attainment in Scotland. SCRE Spotlights 64. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
36. Rose, S., R.C. Lewontin, and L.J. Kamin. 1984. Not in our genes: Biology, ideology and human nature. Harmondsworth: Pelican Books.
37. Russell Group Association for Widening Participation. 2003. Widening participation in Russell Group universities. London: The Russell Group.
38. Sammons, P., F. Kysel, and P. Mortimore. 1983. Educational priority indices: A new perspective. British Educational Research Journal 9, no. 1: 27-40.
39. Samson, G.E., M.E. Graue, T. Weinstein, and H.J. Walberg. 1984. Academic and occupational performance: A quantitative synthesis. American Educational Research Journal 21, no. 2, summer: 311-321.
40. Schoenthaler, S.J., S.P. Amos, H.J. Eysenck, E. Peritz, and J. Yudkin. 1991. Controlled trial of vitamin-mineral supplementation: Effects on intelligence and performance. Personality & Individual Differences 12: 351-62.
41. Stage, C. 2003. Entrance to higher education in Sweden. Paper presented at School of Education, Univ. of London, October. http://www.umu.se/edmeas/publikationer/pdf/Em%20no%2051.pdf.
42. St John, E.P., A.B. Simmons, and G. Droogsma Musoba. 2001. Merit-aware admissions in public universi-ties. Thought & Action winter 2001-2002. Washington, DC: National Education Association.
43. Stobart, G. 2000. The Scholastic Aptitude Test (SAT) as a model for an academic aptitude test in England. Paper presented to the Advisory Group on Research into Assessment and Qualifications, June 22, at QCA, London.
44. Tinklin, T., L. Croxford, A. Ducklin, and B. Frame. 2001. Gender andpupil performance in Scotland’s schools. Edinburgh: Univ. of Edinburgh, Centre for Educational Sociology.
45. West, A., and R. Gibbs. 2004. Selecting undergraduate students: What can the UK learn from the American SAT? Higher Education Quarterly 0951-5224, 58, no. 1: 63-7.
46. Whetton, C., A. McDonald, and P. Newton. 2001. Aptitude testing for university entrance. Paper presented at the 27th Annual Conference of the International Association for Educational Assessment, May 611, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Slough: NFER.
47. Willerma, L., and J.A. Churchill. 1967. Intelligence and birth weight in identical twins. Child Development 38, no. 3: 623-9.
48. Wood, R. 1986. Aptitude testing is not an engine for equalising educational opportunity. British Journal of Educational Studies 34, no. 1, February: 26-37.