Explicit Instructional Interactions: Exploring the Black Box of a Tier 2 Mathematics Intervention

Remedial and Special Education

Volumn 38, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 98-110

  Doabler, Christian T ^a   Clarke, Ben ^b   Stoolmiller, Mike ^c   Kosty, Derek B ^d   Fien, Hank ^b   Smolkowski, Keith ^d   Baker, Scott K ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d OREGON RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

instructional interactions; systematic and explicit mathematics instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 85015792716     PISSN: 07419325     EISSN: 15384756     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0741932516654219     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Archer A. L., Hughes C. A., (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and efficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
2. Baker S. K., Chard D., Clarke B., Smolkowski K., Fien H., (2008). Early learning in mathematics: Efficacy in kindergarten classrooms. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences.
3. Ball D. L., Hill H. C., Bass H., (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide? American Educator, 29, 14–22, 43–46.
4. Berch D. B., (2005). Making sense of number sense: Implications for children with mathematical disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 333–339.
5. Bryant B. R., Bryant D. P., Gersten R. M., Scammacca N. N., Funk C., Winter A... Pool C., (2008). The effects of Tier 2 intervention on the mathematics performance of first-grade students who are at risk for mathematics difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 47–63.
6. Bryant D. P., Bryant B. R., Roberts G., Vaughn S., Pfannenstiel K. H., Porterfield J., Gersten R., (2011). Early numeracy intervention program for first-grade students with mathematics difficulties. Exceptional Children, 78, 7–23.
7. Clarke B., Doabler C. T., Smolkowski K., Baker S. K., Fien H., Strand Cary M., (2016). Examining the efficacy of a Tier 2 kindergarten intervention. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 49, 152–165. doi:10.1177/0022219414538514
8. Clarke B., Doabler C. T., Smolkowski K., Kurtz-Nelson E., Baker S., Fien H., Kosty D., (in press). Testing the immediate and long-term efficacy of a Tier 2 kindergarten mathematics intervention. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness.
9. Clarke B., Shinn M. R., (2004). A preliminary investigation into the identification and development of early mathematics curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Review, 33, 234–248.
10. Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
11. Connor C., (2013). Commentary on two classroom observation systems: Moving toward a shared understanding of effective teaching. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 342–346.
12. Coyne M. D., Kame’enui E. J., Carnine D., (2011). Effective teaching strategies that accommodate diverse learners (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
13. Doabler C. T., Baker S. K., Kosty D., Smolkowski K., Clarke B., Miller S. J., Fien H., (2015). Examining the association between explicit mathematics instruction and student mathematics achievement. Elementary School Journal, 115, 303–333.
14. Doabler C. T., Clarke B., Fien H., Baker S., Kosty D., Strand Cary M., (2015). The science behind curriculum development and evaluation: Taking a design science approach in the production of a Tier 2 mathematics curriculum. Learning Disability Quarterly, 38, 97–111.
15. Forman S. G., Shapiro E. S., Codding R. S., Gonzales J. E., Reddy L. A., Rosenfield S. A... Stoiber K. C., (2013). Implementation science and school psychology. School Psychology Quarterly, 28, 77–100. doi:10.1037/spq0000019
16. Fuchs D., Fuchs L. S., (2015). Rethinking service delivery for students with significant learning problems: Developing and implementing intensive instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 105–111. doi:10.1177/0741932514558337
17. Fuchs L. S., Compton D. L., Fuchs D., Paulsen K., Bryant J. D., Hamlett C. L., (2005). The prevention, identification, and cognitive determinants of math difficulty. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97, 493–513.
18. Fuchs L. S., Fuchs D., Compton D. L., (2012). The early prevention of mathematics difficulty: Its power and limitations. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 257–269.
19. Fuchs L. S., Vaughn S., (2012). Responsiveness-to-intervention: A decade later. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45, 195–203.
20. Gersten R., Chard D., (1999). Number sense: Rethinking arithmetic instruction for students with mathematical disabilities. The Journal of Special Education, 33, 18–28.
21. Gersten R., Chard D., Jayanthi M., Baker S. K., Morphy P., Flojo J., (2009). Mathematics instruction for students with learning disabilities: A meta-analysis of instructional components. Review of Educational Research, 79, 1202–1242.
22. Mayer R. E., (2004). Should there be a three-strikes rule against pure discovery learning? American Psychologist, 59, 14–19.
23. Muthén L. K., Muthén B. O., (2012). Mplus user’s guide (Version 7). Los Angeles, CA: Author. Retrieved from https://www.statmodel.com/ugexcerpts.shtml
24. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
25. National Research Council. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: Mathematics Learning Study Committee.
26. Pianta R. C., Hamre B. K., (2009). Conceptualization, measurement, and improvement of classroom processes: Standardized observation can leverage capacity. Educational Researcher, 38, 109–119.
27. Pro-Ed. (2007). Test of Early Mathematics Ability, Third Edition. Austin, TX: Author.
28. Rohrer D., Pashler H., (2010). Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies. Educational Researcher, 39, 406–412.
29. Simmons D., (2015). Instructional engineering principles to frame the future of reading intervention research and practice. Remedial and Special Education, 36, 45–51.
30. Smolkowski K., Gunn B., (2012). Reliability and validity of the classroom observations of student-teacher interactions (COSTI) for kindergarten reading instruction. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 27, 316–328.
31. Sood S., Jitendra A., (2013). An exploratory study of number sense program to develop kindergarten students number proficiency. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 46, 328–346.
32. Stoolmiller M., Eddy J. M., Reid J. B., (2000). Detecting and describing preventative intervention effects in a universal school-based randomized trail targeting delinquent and violent behavior. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 68, 296–306.
33. Vaughn S., Swanson E. A., (2015). Special education research advances knowledge in education. Exceptional Children, 82, 11–24.
34. Yoder P. J., Woynaroski T., (2015). How to study the influence of intensity of treatment on generalized skill and knowledge acquisition in students with disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 24, 152–166. doi:10.1007/s10864-014-9216-6