Academic-community partnership to develop a patient-centered breast cancer risk reduction program for latina primary care patients

Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 189-199

  Castañeda, Sheila F ^a   Giacinto, Rebeca E ^a   Medeiros, Elizabeth A ^a   Brongiel, Ilana ^b   Cardona, Olga ^b   Perez, Patricia ^b   Talavera, Gregory A ^a  

^a SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b San Ysidro Health Center Inc   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast cancer risk reduction; Community health center; Community based participatory research; Formative research; Latinas; Patient centered care; Women s health

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BREAST TUMOR; CALIFORNIA; ETHNOLOGY; FEMALE; HISPANIC; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT STUDY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RISK REDUCTION;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HISPANIC AMERICANS; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; PILOT PROJECTS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RISK REDUCTION BEHAVIOR;

EID: 85015339590     PISSN: 21973792     EISSN: 21968837     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s40615-015-0125-8     Document Type: Article

References (125)

1. American Cancer Society (ACS). Cancer facts & figures for Hispanics/Latinos 2012–2014. Atlanta: American Cancer Society; 2012.
2. American Cancer Society (ACS). California cancer facts & figures, 2008. 2008 [cited 2008 February 14]; Available from: http:// www.ccrcal.org/PDF/ACS2008.pdf.
3. California Cancer Registry. Public use data set: California cancer incidence andmortality rates plus interactivemaps 2008 [retrieved 2008 August 1]; Available from: http://www.ccrcal.org/dataquery. html.
4. American Cancer Society. Cancer facts& figures, 2014. Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@research/ documents/webcontent/acspc-042151.pdf.
5. American Cancer Society (ACS). Colorectal cancer facts & figures, 2014–2016. 2014 [Retrieved 2008 February 1]; Available from: http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/documents/ document/acspc-042280.pdf.
6. Soni, A. Top 10 most costly conditions among men and women, 2008: estimates for the U.S. civilian noninstitutionalized adult population, age 18 and older. Statistical Brief #331., 2011; Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD. http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_files/publications/ st331/stat331.pdf.
7. Yabroff KR, Warren JL, Banthin J, Schrag D, Mariotto A, LawrenceWet al. Comparison of approaches for estimating prevalence costs of care for cancer patients: what is the impact of data source? Med Care. 2009; 47 (7 Suppl 1): S64–9. doi: 10.1097/ MLR.0b013e3181a23e25.
8. Campbell JD, Ramsey SD. The costs of treating breast cancer in the US: a synthesis of published evidence. [Meta-AnalysisResearch Support, Non-U.S. Gov’tReview]. Pharmacoeconomics. 2009; 27 (3): 199–209.
9. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer prevention (PDQ®). 2013a; Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/pdq/ prevention/breast/Patient/page3.
10. Zambrana RE, Breen N, Fox SA, Gutierrez-Mohamed ML. Use of cancer screening practices by Hispanic women: analyses by subgroup. Prev Med. 1999; 29 (6 Pt 1): 466–77.
11. National Cancer Institute. Breast cancer prevention (PDQ®). 2007 [Retrieved 2007 December 7]; Available from: http://www.cancer. gov/cancertopics/pdq/prevention/breast/Patient/.
12. Elmore JG, Armstrong K, Lehman CD, Fletcher SW. Screening for breast cancer. JAMA. 2005; 293 (10): 1245–56.
13. Elmore JG, Reisch LM, Barton MB, Barlow WE, Rolnick S, Harris EL et al. Efficacy of breast cancer screening in the community according to risk level. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005; 97 (14): 1035–43.
14. Wells KJ, RoetzheimRG. Health disparities in receipt of screening mammography in Latinas: a critical review of recent literature. Cancer Control. 2007; 14 (4): 369–79.
15. Vernon SW, McQueen A, Tiro JA, del Junco DJ. Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: a systematic review and meta-analysis. [Meta-Analysis ResearchSupport, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov’t Review]. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102 (14): 1023–39.
16. Mandelblatt JS, Cronin KA, Bailey S, Berry DA, de Koning HJ, Draisma G et al. Effects of mammography screening under different screening schedules: model estimates of potential benefits and harms. [Research Support, N.I.H., ExtramuralResearch Support, U.S. Gov’t, P.H.S.]. Ann Intern Med. 2009; 151 (10): 738–47.
17. National Cancer Institute. National Cancer Institute factsheet: mammograms. 2013b; Available from: http://www.cancer.gov/ cancertopics/factsheet/detection/mammograms#r1. Retrieved July 15, 2013
18. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Appendix F: screening for breast cancer, guide to clinical preventive services, 2012, Clinical Summary of 2002 U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation,. 2012 [cited 2013 July 15]; Available from: http://www.ahrq.gov/professionals/cliniciansproviders/ guidelines-recommendations/guide/appendix-f.html.
19. Rodriguez MA, Ward LM, Perez-Stable EJ. Breast and cervical cancer screening: impact of health insurance status, ethnicity, and nativity of Latinas. Ann Fam Med. 2005; 3 (3): 235–41.
20. Frazier EL, Jiles RB, Mayberry R. Use of screening mammography and clinical breast examinations among black, Hispanic, and white women. Prev Med. 1996; 25 (2): 118–25.
21. Hubbell FA, Chavez LR, Mishra SI, Valdez RB. Differing beliefs about breast cancer among Latinas and Anglo women. West J Med. 1996; 164 (5): 405–9.
22. Susan G. Komen for the Cure San Diego Affiliate, Community Profile Report, 2011: 4699 Murphy Canyon Road, Suite #207, San Diego, CA 92123.
23. Castaneda SF, Malcarne VL, Foster-Fishman PG, Davidson WS, Mumman MK, Riley N, Sadler GR. Health care access and breast cancer screening among Latinas along the California-Mexican border. J Immigr Minor Health, 2013. doi: 10.1007/s10903-013-9938-x
24. Selden CR, Zorn M, Ratzan S, Parker RM. Health literacy. Current bibliographies in medicine. No 2000-1. Bethesda, MD: National Library of Medicine 2000 [Retrieved 2008 May 21]; Available from: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/archive//20061214/pubs/cbm/ hliteracy.html
25. Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, Glasgow RE, Engelgau MM, Jack L et al. The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med. 2002; 22 (4 Suppl): 15–38.
26. Osborne RH, Batterham RW, Elsworth GR, Hawkins M, Buchbinder R. The grounded psychometric development and initial validation of the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). BMC Public Health. 2013; 13 (1): 1–17.
27. Kutner M, Greenberg E, Jin Y, Paulsen C. The health literacy of America’s adults: results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2006-483). U.S. Department of Education. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics. 2006 [Retrieved 2008 May 20]; Available from: http://nces.ed.gov/ pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2006483.
28. Dewalt DA, Berkman ND, Sheridan S, Lohr KN, Pignone MP. Literacy and health outcomes: a systematic reviewof the literature. J Gen Intern Med. 2004; 19 (12): 1228–39.
29. DeNavas-Walt, C., Proctor, BD. and Lee CH. Income, poverty, and health insurance coverage in the United States: 2004. Current Population Reports, P60-229, U. S. Governmental PrintingOffice, Washington, D. C. 2005 [Retrieved 2008 January 16]; Available from: http://www.census.gov/prod/2005pubs/p60-229.pdf.
30. National Center for Educational Statistics (NCES). Status and trends in the education of racial and ethnic minorities. NCES 2007-039 2007; Available from: http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/ pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2007039.
31. Berkman ND, Dewalt DA, Pignone MP, Sheridan SL, Lohr KN, Lux L et al. Literacy and health outcomes. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ); 2004 (87): p. 1–8.
32. Dewalt DA, Pignone MP. The role of literacy in health and health care. Am Fam Physician. 2005; 72 (3): 387–8.
33. Baker DW, Parker RM, Williams MV, Clark WS, Nurss J. The relationship of patient reading ability to self-reported health and use of health services. Am J Public Health. 1997; 87 (6): 1027–30.
34. Scott TL, Gazmararian JA, Williams MV, Baker DW. Health literacy and preventive health use among Medicare enrollees in a managed care organization. Med Care. 2005; 40 (5): 395–404.
35. Davis TC, Arnold C, Berkel HJ, Nandy I, Jackson RH, Glass J. Knowledge and attitude on screening mammography among lowliterate, low-income women. Cancer. 1996; 78 (9): 1912–20.
36. Pignone M, DeWalt DA, Sheridan S, Berkman N, Lohr KN. Interventions to improve health outcomes for patients with low literacy. A systematic review. J Gen Intern Med. 2005; 20 (2): 185–92.
37. Williams MV, Baker DW, Parker RM, Nurss JR. Relationship of functional health literacy to patients’ knowledge of their chronic disease. A study of patients with hypertension and diabetes. Arch Intern Med. 1998; 158 (2): 166–72.
38. Ridpath JR, Larson EB, Greene SM. Can integrating health literacy into the patient-centered medical home help us weather the perfect storm? J Gen Intern Med. 2012; 27 (5): 588–94.
39. Sheridan SL, Halpern DJ, Viera AJ, Berkman ND, Donahue KE, Crotty K. Interventions for individuals with low health literacy: a systematic review. J Health Commun. 2011; 16 Suppl 3: 30–54.
40. Schaefer CT. Integrated review of health literacy interventions. Orthop Nurs. 2008; 27 (5): 302–17.
41. Breen N, Rao SR, Meissner HI. Immigration, health care access, and recent cancer tests amongMexican-Americans in California. J Immigr Minor Health. 2010; 12 (4): 433–44.
42. Carrasquillo O, Pati S. The role of health insurance on Pap smear and mammography utilization by immigrants living in the United States. Prev Med. 2004; 39 (5): 943–50.
43. Castaneda SF, Rosenbaum RP, Gonzalez P, Holscher JT. Breast and cervical cancer screening among rural midwestern Latina migrant and seasonal farmworkers. J Prim Care Community Health. 2012; 3 (2): 104–10.
44. Garbers S, Jessop DJ, Foti H, Uribelarrea M, Chiasson MA. Barriers to breast cancer screening for low-income Mexican and Dominican women in New York City. J Urban Health. 2003; 80 (1): 81–91.
45. Gaylord-Harden NK, Gipson P, Mance G, Grant KE. Coping patterns of African American adolescents: a confirmatory factor analysis and cluster analysis of the Children’s Coping Strategies Checklist. Psychol Assess. 2008; 20 (1): 10–22.
46. Gelberg L, Andersen RM, Leake BD. The behavioral model for vulnerable populations: application to medical care use and outcomes for homeless people. Health Serv Res. 2000; 34 (6): 1273–302.
47. Gonzalez P, Castaneda SF, Mills PJ, Talavera GA, Elder JP, Gallo LC. Determinants of breast, cervical and colorectal cancer screening adherence in Mexican-American women. J Community Health. 2012; 37 (2): 421–33.
48. Mandelblatt JS, Gold K, O’Malley AS, Taylor K, Cagney K, Hopkins JS, Kerner J. Breast and cervix cancer screening among multiethnic women: role of age, health, and source of care. Prev Med. 1999; 28 (4): 418–25.
49. Miranda PY, Tarraf W, Gonzalez P, Johnson-Jennings M, Gonzalez HM. Breast cancer screening trends in the United States and ethnicity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2012; 21 (2): 351–7.
50. Nuno T, Castle PE, Harris R, Estrada A, Garcia F, Yuma Project Technical T. Breast and cervical cancer screening utilization among Hispanic women living near the United States-Mexico border. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2011; 20 (5): 685–93.
51. O’Malley AS, Kerner J, Johnson AE, Mandelblatt J. Acculturation and breast cancer screening among Hispanic women in New York City. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89 (2): 219–27.
52. Ortega AN, Fang H, Perez VH, Rizzo JA, Carter-Pokras O, Wallace SP, Gelberg L. Health care access, use of services, and experiences among undocumented Mexicans and other Latinos. Arch Intern Med. 2007; 167 (21): 2354–60.
53. Otero-Sabogal R, Stewart S, Sabogal F, Brown BA, Perez-Stable EJ. Access and attitudinal factors related to breast and cervical cancer rescreening: why are Latinas still underscreened? Health Educ Behav. 2003; 30 (3): 337–59.
54. Ramirez AG, Suarez L, Laufman L, Barroso C, Chalela P. Hispanic women’s breast and cervical cancer knowledge, attitudes, and screening behaviors. Am J Health Promot. 2000; 14 (5): 292–300.
55. Sambamoorthi U, McAlpine DD. Racial, ethnic, socioeconomic, and access disparities in the use of preventive services among women. Prev Med. 2003; 37 (5): 475–84.
56. Suarez L, Ramirez AG, Villarreal R, Marti J, McAlister A, Talavera GA et al. Social networks and cancer screening in four U.S. Hispanic groups. Am J Prev Med. 2000; 19 (1): 47–52.
57. Valdez A, Banerjee K, Ackerson L, Fernandez M, Otero-Sabogal R, Somkin CP. Correlates of breast cancer screening among lowincome, low-education Latinas. Prev Med. 2001; 33 (5): 495–502.
58. Sabatino SA, Lawrence B, Elder R, Mercer SL, Wilson KM, DeVinney B, et al. Effectiveness of interventions to increase screening for breast, cervical, and colorectal cancers: nine updated systematic reviews for the guide to community preventive services. Am J Prev Med. 2012; 43 (1): 97–118.
59. Phillips CE, Rothstein JD, Beaver K, Sherman BJ, Freund KM, Battaglia TA. Patient navigation to increase mammography screening among inner city women. J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26 (2): 123–9.
60. Ramirez AG, Perez-Stable EJ, Talavera GA, Penedo FJ, Carrillo JE, Fernandez ME, et al. Time to definitive diagnosis of breast cancer in Latina and non-Hispanic white women: the six cities study. Springerplus. 2013; 2 (1): 84.
61. Corcoran J, Dattalo P, Crowley M. Interventions to increase mammography rates among U.S. Latinas: a systematic review. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2010; 19 (7): 1281–8.
62. Doty, MM. Hispanic patients’ double burden: lack of health insurance and limited English. The Commonwealth Fund. 2003. Retrieved from http://www.commonwealthfund.org/usr_doc/ doty_hispanicdoubleburden_592.pdf?section=4039.
63. Salazar MK. Hispanic women’s beliefs about breast cancer and mammography. Cancer Nurs. 1996; 19 (6): 437–46.
64. Brach, C. and Chevarley FM. Demographics and health care access and utilization of limited-English-proficient and Englishproficient Hispanics. Research Findings No. 28. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2008. Rockville, MD. Retrieved from http://www.meps.ahrq.gov/papers/rf28/rf28.pdf.
65. Derose KP, Baker DW. Limited English proficiency and Latinos’ use of physician services. Med Care Res Rev. 2000; 57 (1): 76–91.
66. Hu DJ, Covell RM. Health care usage by Hispanic outpatients as function of primary language. West J Med. 1986; 144 (4): 490–3.
67. Stein JA, Fox SA. Language preference as an indicator of mammography use among Hispanic women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1990; 82 (21): 1715–6.
68. Gorin SS, Heck JE. Cancer screening among Latino subgroups in the United States. Prev Med. 2005; 40 (5): 515–26.
69. Suarez L, Pulley L. Comparing acculturation scales and their relationship to cancer screening among older Mexican-American women. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995; 18: 41–7.
70. Borrayo EA, Gonzalez P, Swaim R, Marcus A, Flores E, Espinoza P. The Latina breast cancer screening sacle: beliefs about breast cancer and breast cancer screening. J Health Psychol. 2009; 14 (7): 944–55.
71. Borrayo EA, Jenkins SR. Feeling healthy: so why should Mexican-descent women screen for breast cancer? Qual Health Res. 2001a; 11 (6): 812–23.
72. Borrayo EA, Jenkins SR. Feeling indecent: breast cancer screening resistance of Mexican descent women. J Health Psychol. 2001b; 6: 537–50.
73. Chavez LR, Hubbell FA, McMullin JM, Martinez RG, Mishra SI. Structure andmeaning in models of breast and cervical cancer risk factors: a comparison of perceptions among Latinas, Anglo women, and physicians. Med Anthropol Q. 1995a; 9 (1): 40–74.
74. Chavez LR, Hubbell FA, McMullin JM, Martinez RG, Mishra SI. Understanding knowledge and attitudes about breast cancer. A cultural analysis Arch Fam Med. 1995; 4 (2): 145–52.
75. Chavez LR, Hubbell FA, Mishra SI, Valdez RB. The influence of fatalism on self-reported use of Papanicolaou smears. Am J Prev Med. 1997; 13 (6): 418–24.
76. Florez KR, Aguirre AN, Viladrich A, Cespedes A, De La Cruz AA, Abraido-Lanza AF. Fatalism or destiny? A qualitative study and interpretative framework on Dominican women’s breast cancer beliefs. J Immigr Minor Health, 2008.
77. Perez-Stable EJ, Sabogal F, Otero-Sabogal R, Hiatt RA, McPhee SJ. Misconceptions about cancer among Latinos and Anglos. JAMA. 1992; 268 (22): 3219–23.
78. Schettino MR, Hernandez-Valero MA, Moguel R, Hajek RA, Jones LA. Assessing breast cancer knowledge, beliefs, and misconceptions among Latinas in Houston. Texas J Cancer Educ. 2006; 21 (1 Suppl): S42–6.
79. Austin LT, Ahmad F, McNally MJ, Stewart DE. Breast and cervical cancer screening in Hispanic women: a literature review using the health belief model. Womens Health Issues. 2002; 12 (3): 122-8.
80. Hubbell FA, Mishra SI, Chavez LR, Valdez RB. The influence of knowledge and attitudes about breast cancer on mammography use among Latinas and Anglo women. J Gen Intern Med. 1997; 12 (8): 505–8.
81. Garces IC, Scarinci IC, Harrison L. An examination of sociocultural factors associated with health and health care seeking among Latina immigrants. J Immigr Minor Health. 2006; 8 (4): 377–85.
82. Natale-Pereira A, Marks J, Vega M, Mouzon D, Hudson SV, Salas-Lopez D. Barriers and facilitators for colorectal cancer screening practices in the Latino community: perspectives from community leaders. Cancer Control. 2008; 15 (2): 157–65.
83. Suarez L, Roche RA, Nichols D, Simpson DM. Knowledge, behavior, and fears concerning breast and cervical cancer among older low-income Mexican-American women. Am J Prev Med. 1997; 13 (2): 137–42.
84. Balcazar H, Castro FG, Krull JL. Cancer risk reduction in Mexican American women: the role of acculturation, education, and health risk factors. Health Educ Q. 1995; 22 (1): 61–84.
85. Erwin DO, Trevino M, Saad-Harfouche FG, Rodriguez EM, Gage E, Jandorf L. Contextualizing diversity and culture within cancer control interventions for Latinas: changing interventions, not cultures. Soc Sci Med. 2010; 71 (4): 693–701.
86. Schmid KL, Rivers SE, Latimer AE, Salovey P. Targeting or tailoring? Mark Health Serv. 2008; 28 (1): 32–7.
87. Kreuter MW, Wray RJ. Tailored and targeted health communication: strategies for enhancing information relevance. Am J Health Behav. 2003; 27 Suppl 3: S227–32.
88. Kreuter MW, Lukwago SN, Bucholtz RD, Clark EM, Sanders-ThompsonV. Achieving cultural appropriateness in health promotion programs: targeted and tailored approaches. Health Educ Behav. 2003; 30 (2): 133–46.
89. Navarro AM, Senn KL, McNicholas LJ, Kaplan RM, Roppe B, Campo MC. Por La Vida model intervention enhances use of cancer screening tests among Latinas. Am J Prev Med. 1998; 15 (1): 32–41.
90. Nuno T, Martinez ME, Harris R, Garcia F. A Promotoraadministered group education intervention to promote breast and cervical cancer screening in a rural community along the U.S.-Mexico border: a randomized controlled trial. Cancer Causes Control. 2011; 22 (3): 367–74.
91. Martinez-Donate AP. Using lay health advisors to promote breast and cervical cancer screening among Latinas: a review. WMJ. 2009; 108 (5): 259–62.
92. Albarran CR, Heilemann MV, Koniak-Griffin D. Promotoras as facilitators of change: Latinas’ perspectives after participating in a lifestyle behaviour intervention program. J Adv Nurs, 2014. doi: 10.1111/jan.12383
93. Johnson CM, Sharkey JR, Dean WR, St John JA, Castillo M. Promotoras as research partners to engage health disparity communities. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2013; 113 (5): 638–42.
94. Stacciarini JM, Rosa A, Ortiz M, Munari DB, Uicab G, Balam M. Promotoras in mental health: a review of English, Spanish, and Portuguese literature. Fam Community Health. 2012; 35 (2): 92-102.
95. Findley S, Matos S, Hicks A, Chang J, Reich D. Community health worker integration into the health care team accomplishes the triple aim in a patient-centered medical home: a Bronx tale. J Ambul Care Manag. 2014; 37 (1): 82–91.
96. Minkler M, Wallerstein N. Introduction to community-based participatory research. In: Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-based participatory research for health. Jossey-Boss: San Francisco; 2003. p. 3–27.
97. U.S. Census Bureau. The Hispanic population: 2010, 2010 census briefs. 2013 [cited 2013 November 20]; Available from: http:// www.census.gov/prod/cen2010/briefs/c2010br-04.pdf.
98. Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall; 1986.
99. Guba EG, Lincoln YS. Fourth generation evaluation. Newbury Park: Sage; 1989.
100. Miles MB, Huberman AM. Qualitative data analysis: an expanded source book. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1994.
101. Patton MQ. Qualitative evaluation and research methods. 3rd ed. Newbury Park: Sage; 2002.
102. Poss JE. Developing an instrument to study the tuberculosis screening behaviors of Mexican migrant farmworkers. J Transcult Nurs. 1999; 10 (4): 306–19.
103. Airhihenbuwa CO, Webster JD. Culture and African contexts of HIV/AIDS prevention, care and support. SAHARA J. 2004; 1 (1): 4–13.
104. Hubbell FA, Chavez LR, Mishra SI, Magana JR, Burciaga Valdez R. From ethnography to intervention: developing a breast cancer control program for Latinas. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr. 1995; 18: 109–15.
105. National Institute for Literacy. Research-based health literacy materials and instruction guide: beginningABE and ESL levels. 2012 [Retrieved 2012 June 30]; Available from: http:// healthliteracynetwork.org/materials.
106. Helitzer D, Hollis C, Cotner J, Oestreicher N. Health literacy demands of written health information materials: an assessment of cervical cancer prevention materials. Cancer Control. 2009; 16 (1): 70–8.
107. Hill-Briggs F, Smith AS. Evaluation of diabetes and cardiovascular disease print patient education materials for usewith low-health literate populations. Diabetes Care. 2008; 31 (4): 667–71.
108. Castañeda SF, Xiong Y, Gallo LC, Yepes-Rios M, Ji M, Talavera AC et al. Colorectal cancer educational intervention targeting Latino patients attending a community health center. J Primary Care Commun Health. 2012; 3 (3): 164–9.
109. Sadler GR, Gonzalez J, Mumman M, Cullen L, Lahousse SF, Malcarne V et al. Adapting a program to inform African American and Hispanic American women about cancer clinical trials. J Cancer Educ. 2010; 25 (2): 142–5.
110. Resnicow K, Baranowski T, Ahluwalia JS, Braithwaite RL. Cultural sensitivity in public health: defined and demystified. Ethn Dis. 1999; 9 (1): 10–21.
111. Marin G, Marin BV. Research with Hispanic populations. Newbury Park: Sage; 1991.
112. Chew LD, Bradley KA, Boyko EJ. Brief questions to identify patients with inadequate health literacy. Fam Med. 2004; 36 (8): 588–94.
113. Castaneda SF, Holscher J, Mumman MK, Salgado H, Keir KB, Foster-Fishman PG, Talavera GA. Dimensions of community and organizational readiness for change. Prog Community Health Partnersh. 2012; 6 (2): 219–26.
114. Weiss BD, Mays MZ, Martz W, Castro KM, DeWalt DA, Pignone MP et al. Quick assessment of literacy in primary care: the newest vital sign. Ann Fam Med. 2005; 3 (6): 514–22.
115. Bird Y, Moraros J, Banegas MP, King S, Prapasiri S, Thompson B. Breast cancer knowledge and early detection among Hispanic women with a family history of breast cancer along the U.S.-Mexico border. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2010; 21 (2): 475–88.
116. Glasgow RE, McKay HG, Piette JD, Reynolds KD. The RE-AIM framework for evaluating interventions: what can it tell us about approaches to chronic illness management? Patient Educ Couns. 2001; 44 (2): 119–27.
117. Glasgow RE, Nelson CC, Strycker LA, King DK. Using RE-AIM metrics to evaluate diabetes self-management support interventions. Am J Prev Med. 2006; 30 (1): 67–73.
118. Glasgow RE, Vogt TM, Boles SM. Evaluating the public health impact of health promotion interventions: the RE-AIM framework. Am J Public Health. 1999; 89 (9): 1322–7.
119. Philis-Tsimikas A, Fortmann A, Lleva-Ocana L, Walker C, Gallo LC. Peer-led diabetes education programs in high-risk Mexican Americans improve glycemic control compared with standard approaches: a project Dulce promotora randomized trial. Diabetes Care. 2011; 34 (9): 1926–31.
120. Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, Michie S, Nazareth I, Petticrew M, Medical Research Council G. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008; 337: a1655.
121. Saunders RP, Evans MH, Joshi P. Developing a processevaluation plan for assessing health promotion program implementation: a how-to guide. Health Promot Pract. 2005; 6 (2): 134–47.
122. Steckler A, Linnan L. Process evaluation for public health interventions and research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2002.
123. Cohen J, Cohen P, West S, Aiken L. Applied multiple regression/ correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. 3rd ed. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2003.
124. Kleinbaum DG, Kupper LL, Nizam A, Muller KE. Applied regression analysis and multivariable methods. 4th ed. Pacific Grove: Duxbury; 2007.
125. Fernandez ME, Savas LS, Lipizzi E, Smith JS, Vernon SW. Cervical cancer control for Hispanic women in Texas: strategies from research and practice. Gynecol Oncol. 2014; 132 Suppl 1: S26–32.