Interventions to increase mammography rates among U.S. latinas: A systematic review

Journal of Women's Health

Volumn 19, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 1281-1288

  Corcoran, Jacqueline ^a   Dattalo, Patrick ^a   Crowley, Meghan ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST CANCER; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER PREVENTION; ETHNIC GROUP; HEALTH DISPARITY; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; UNITED STATES; WOMEN'S HEALTH;

ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LATIN AMERICA; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIMARY PREVENTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 77954295367     PISSN: 15409996     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/jwh.2009.1621     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Wells K, Roetzheim RG. Health disparities in receipt of screening mammography in Latinas: A critical review of recent literature. Cancer Control 2007;14:369-379.
2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mammo-graphy: Mammography percentages by race and ethnicity. Available at www.cdc.gov/cancer/breast/ statistics/screening.htm Accessed August 19, 2009.
3. American Cancer Society 2006. Cancer facts and figures for Hispanics/Latinos 2006-2008; Available at www.cancer.org/downloads/STT/ CAFF2006HispPWSecured.pdf Accessed March 22, 2008.
4. American Cancer Society. American Cancer Society guidelines for the early detection of cancer. 2010. Available at www.cancer.org/docroot/PED/content/PED- 2-3X-ACS- Cancer-Detection-Guidelines-36.asp Accessed April 23, 2010.
5. National Cancer Institute. National Cancer Institute fact sheet: Mammograms. 2010. Available at www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Detection/ mammograms#a3 Accessed April 23, 2010
6. Bonfill X, Marzo M, Pladevall M, Marti J, Emparanza J. Strategies for increasing women's participation in community breast cancer screening. Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2001;1:CD002943.
7. Legler J, Meissner HI, Coyne C, Breen N, Chollette V, Rimer BK. The effectiveness of interventions to promote mam-mography among women with historically lower rates of screening. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2002;11:59-71.
8. Littel J, Corcoran J, Pillai V. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.
9. NCSS. (2007). NCS 2007 [Computer software]. Available at NCSS.com
10. Hunter JE, Schmidt FL. Fixed vs. random effects meta-analysis models: Implications for cumulative research knowledge. Int J Selection Assess 2008;8:275-292.
11. Mullen B. Advanced BASIC meta-analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., 1989.
12. Rosenthal R. Meta-analytic procedure for social research. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1984.
13. Hedges LV, Olkin I. Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic Press, 1985.
14. Hedges LV, Pigott,TD. The power of statistical tests in meta-analysis. Psychol Methods 2001;6:203-217.
15. Fernández ME, Gonzales A, Tortolero-Luna G, Williams J, Saavedra-Embesi M, Chan W, Vernon SW. Effectiveness of Cultivando La Salud: A breast and cervical cancer screening promotion program for low-income Hispanic women. Am J Public Health 2009;99:936-943.
16. Fernandez-Esquer ME, Espinoza P, Torres I, Ramirez AG, McAlister AL. A Su Salud. A quasi-experimental study among Mexican American women. Am J Health Behav 2003;27:536-545.
17. Fox SA, Stein JA, Gonzalez RE, Farrenkopf M, Dellinger A. A trial to increase mammography utilization among Los Angeles Hispanic women. J Health Care Poor Underserved 1998;9:309-321.
18. Fox SA, Stein JA, Sockloskie R J, Ory MG Targeted mailed materials and the Medicare beneficiary: Increasing mam-mogram screening among the elderly. Am J Public Health 2001;91:55-61.
19. Mishra SI, Chavez LR, Maga JR, Nava P, Burciaga VR, Hubbell FA. Improving breast cancer control among Latinas: Evaluation of a theory-based educational program. Health Educ Behav 1998;25:653-670.
20. Navarro AM, Senn KL, McNicholas LJ, Kaplan RM, Roppe B, Campo MC. Por LaVida model intervention enhances use of cancer screening tests among Latinas. Am J Prev Med 1998;15:32-41.
21. Sauaia A, Min S, Lack D, et al. Church-based breast cancer screening education: Impact of two approaches on Latinas enrolled in public and private health insurance plans. Prev Chronic Dis 2007;4:1-10.
22. Skaer TL, Robison LM, Sclar DA, Harding GH. Financial incentive and the use of mammography among Hispanic migrants to the United States. Health Care Women Int 1996;17:281-291.
23. Suarez L, Roche RA, Pulley L, Weiss NS, Goldman D, Simpson DM. Why a peer intervention program for Mexican-American women failed to modify the secular trend in cancer screening. Am J Prev Med 1997;13: 411-417.
24. Wolf FM. Meta-analysis: Quantitative methods for research synthesis. Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences Series 1986:07-59. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
25. DeCoster J, Iselin AM. Calculating a fail safe N for Cohen's d, 2005. Available at www.stat-help.com/spreadsheets/Fail%20Safe%20N.xls Accessed September 23, 2008.
26. Chinn S. A simple method for converting an odds ratio to effect size for use in meta-analysis. Statistics Med 2000; 19:3127-3131.
27. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for behavioral sciences, 2nd ed. Hillsdale, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1988.
28. Corcoran J, Crowley M. Latinas' attitudes about breast cancer prevention: A meta-synthesis. Soc Work 2010.
29. Dattalo P. Strategies to approximate random sampling and assignment. NY: Oxford University Press, 2009.