Exploring design parameters for a 3D head-up display

PerDis 2014 - Proceedings: 3rd ACM International Symposium on Pervasive Displays 2014

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 38-43

  Broy, Nora ^a,e   Höckh, Simone ^b,c   Frederiksen, Annette ^b   Gilowski, Michael ^b   Eichhorn, Julian ^a   Naser, Felix ^a   Jung, Horst ^b   Niemann, Julia ^a   Schell, Martin ^c   Schmid, Albrecht ^d   Alt, Florian ^e  

^a BMW GROUP   (Germany)

^b ROBERT BOSCH GMBH   (Germany)

^c TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^d UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

^e UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

3D displays; Automotive UIs; Head up displays; Human factors

Indexed keywords

GEOMETRICAL OPTICS; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; HUMAN ENGINEERING; STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING; USER INTERFACES;

3-D DISPLAYS; AUTOMOTIVE UIS; DESIGN PARAMETERS; H.5.2 [INFORMATION INTERFACES AND PRESENTATION]: USER INTERFACES; HEAD UP DISPLAYS; PROJECTION DISTANCE; REAL-WORLD OBJECTS; STEREOSCOPIC VISUALIZATION;

THREE DIMENSIONAL COMPUTER GRAPHICS;

EID: 84904479911     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2611009.2611011     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. N. Broy, F. Alt, S. Schneegass, N. Henze, and A. Schmidt. Perceiving layered information on 3D displays using binocular disparity. In Proc. PerDis '13. ACM, 2013.
2. N. Broy, E. André, and A. Schmidt. Is stereoscopic 3d a better choice for information representation in the car? In Proc. AutomotiveUI'12, New York, NY, USA, 2012. ACM.
3. J. Cutting. How the eye measures reality and virtual reality. Beh. Res. Meth., 29, 1997.
4. D. M. Hoffman, A. R. Girshick, K. Akeley, and M. S. Banks. Vergence-accommodation conflicts hinder visual performance and cause visual fatigue. Jour. of Vis., 8(3), 2008.
5. G. Jones, D. Lee, N. Holliman, and D. Ezra. Controlling perceived depth in stereoscopic images. In Stereoscopic Displays and Virtual Reality Systems VIII, 2001.
6. M. Lambooij, M. Fortuin, I. Heynderickx, and W. IJsselsteijn. Visual discomfort and visual fatigue of stereoscopic displays: A review. Journal of Imaging Science, 2009.
7. N. Milicic and T. Lindberg. Menu interaction in head-up displays. In Human Factors, Security and Safety, 2009.
8. P. Ott. Optic design of head-up displays with freeform surfaces specified by nurbs. In Proc. SPIE, 2008.
9. T. Shibata, J. Kim, D. M. Hoffman, and M. S. Banks. The zone of comfort: Predicting visual discomfort with stereo displays. Journal of Vision, 11(8), 2011.
10. J. Swan, M. Livingston, H. Smallman, D. Brown, Y. Baillot, J. Gabbard, and D. Hix. A perceptual matching technique for depth judgments in optical, see-through augmented reality. In Virtual Reality Conference, 2006, pages 19-26, March 2006.
11. M. Tönnis, V. Broy, and G. Klinker. A survey of challenges related to the design of 3d user interfaces for car drivers. In Proc. 3DUI'06, pages 127-134. IEEE, 2006.
12. M. Tönnis, L. Klein, and G. Klinker. Perception thresholds for augmented reality navigation schemes in large distances. In ISMAR'08, pages 189-190. IEEE, 2008.
13. H. Urey, K. Chellappan, E. Erden, and P. Surman. State of the art in stereoscopic and autostereoscopic displays. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(4):540-555, April 2011.
14. F. Wientapper, H. Wuest, P. Rojtberg, and D. Fellner. A camera-based calibration for automotive augmented reality head-up-displays. In Proc. ISMAR'13. IEEE, 2013.
15. S. P. Williams and R. V. Parrish. New computational control techniques and increased understanding for stereo 3-d displays. In Proc. SPIE, pages 73-82, 1990.