Towards a sustainable optimization of pavement maintenance programs under budgetary restrictions

Journal of Cleaner Production

Volumn 148, Issue , 2017, Pages 90-102

  Torres Machi, Cristina ^a   Pellicer, Eugenio ^a   Yepes, Víctor ^a   Chamorro, Alondra ^b  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b PONTIFICIA UNIVERSIDAD CATÓLICA DE CHILE   (Chile)

Author keywords

Greenhouse gas emissions; Long term effectiveness; Optimization; Pavement management; Sensitivity analysis; Sustainability

Indexed keywords

BUDGET CONTROL; CRASHWORTHINESS; ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GAS EMISSIONS; HIGHWAY PLANNING; MAINTENANCE; MANAGERS; MOTOR TRANSPORTATION; OPTIMIZATION; PAVEMENTS; ROADS AND STREETS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; TRANSPORTATION;

ENVIRONMENTAL ASPECTS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; LONG-TERM EFFECTIVENESS; MAINTENANCE PROGRAMS; MAINTENANCE TREATMENTS; PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT; SUSTAINABLE MAINTENANCE; SUSTAINABLE PRACTICES;

GREENHOUSE GASES;

EID: 85014855861     PISSN: 09596526     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.100     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Ang, G., Marchal, V., Mobilising Private Investment in Sustainable Transport. (OECD Environment Working Papers), 2013, Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris.
2. Araújo, J.P.C., Oliveira, J.R.M., Silva, H.M.R.D., The importance of the use phase on the LCA of environmentally friendly solutions for asphalt road pavements. Transp. Res. Part Transp. Environ. 32 (2014), 97–110, 10.1016/j.trd.2014.07.006.
3. ASCE, ASCE 2013 Report Card for America's Infrastructure. [WWW Document], 2013 http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org (Accessed Sept. 2016).
4. Athena Institute, A Life Cycle Perspective on Concrete and Asphalt Roadways: Embodied Primary Energy and Global Warming Potential. 2006, Cement Association of Canada.
5. AzariJafari, H., Yahia, A., Ben Amor, M., Life cycle assessment of pavements: reviewing research challenges and opportunities. J. Clean. Prod. 112:Part 4 (2016), 2187–2197, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.080.
6. Cerea, P., Preventive Maintenance Treatments on Road Pavements: Multi-approach Life-cycle Assessment. 2010, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.
7. Chamorro, A., Development of a Sustainable Management System for Rural Road Networks in Developing Countries. (PhD. Thesis), 2012, University of Waterloo, Canada.
8. Chamorro, A., Tighe, S., Development of a management framework for rural roads in developing countries. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2093 (2009), 99–107, 10.3141/2093-12.
9. Chamorro, A., Tighe, S.L., Optimized maintenance standards for unpaved road networks based on cost-effectiveness analysis. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2473 (2015), 56–65, 10.3141/2473-07.
10. Chan, P., Tighe, S.L., Quantifying pavement sustainability in economic and environmental perspective. Presented at the Transportation Research Board 89th Annual Meeting, 2010.
11. Chan, P., Tighe, S.L., Pavement Sustainability. 2010, Canadian Ministry of Transportation, Ontario.
12. Chan, S., Lane, B., Kazmierowski, T., Lee, W., Pavement preservation: a solution for sustainability. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2235 (2011), 36–42.
13. Chehovits, J., Galehouse, L., Energy usage and greenhouse gas emissions of pavement preservation processes for asphalt concrete pavements. Presented at the First International Conference on Pavement Preservation, Newport Beach, CA, 2010.
14. Chester, M.V., Horvath, A., Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains. Environ. Res. Lett. 4 (2009), 1–8, 10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008.
15. Chou, J.-S., Le, T.-S., Reliability-based performance simulation for optimized pavement maintenance. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 96 (2011), 1402–1410, 10.1016/j.ress.2011.05.005.
16. CSCE (Canadian Society for Civil Engineering), CPWA (Canadian Public Works Association), CCA (Canadian Construction Association), FCM (Federation of Canadian Municipalities), The Canadian Infrastructure Report Card. Montreal., 2012.
17. de Solminihac, H., Hidalgo, P., Chamorro, A., Asset valuation of low-volume road networks: application to Chilean unpaved roads. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1989 (2007), 72–79, 10.3141/1989-08.
18. EcoInvent, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories. 2011, Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dubendorf, Switzerland.
19. Eurobitume, Partial Life Cycle Inventory for Paving Grade Bitumen. 1999.
20. Feo, T.A., Resende, M.G.C., A probabilistic heuristic for a computationally difficult set covering problem. Oper. Res. Lett. 8 (1989), 67–71.
21. FHWA, Memo: Pavement Preservation Definitions. [WWW Document], 2005 http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/pavement/preservation/091205.cfm (Accessed Sept. 2016).
22. Giani, M.I., Dotelli, G., Brandini, N., Zampori, L., Comparative life cycle assessment of asphalt pavements using reclaimed asphalt, warm mix technology and cold in-place recycling. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 104:Part A (2015), 224–238, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2015.08.006.
23. Giustozzi, F., Crispino, M., Flintsch, G., Multi-attribute life cycle assessment of preventive maintenance treatments on road pavements for achieving environmental sustainability. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 17 (2012), 409–419, 10.1007/s11367-011-0375-6.
24. Golroo, A., Tighe, S., Optimum genetic algorithm structure selection in pavement management. Asian J. Appl. Sci. 5 (2012), 327–341, 10.3923/ajaps.2012.327.341.
25. Gosse, C., Smith, B., Clarens, A., Environmentally preferable pavement management systems. J. Infrastruct. Syst. 19 (2013), 315–325, 10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000118.
26. Gransberg, D., NCHRP Synthesis 411: Microsurfacing, a Synthesis of Highway Practices. 2010, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
27. Gransberg, D., James, D.M., NCHRP Synthesis 342: Chip Seal Best Practices. 2005, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
28. Hicks, R.G., Seeds, S.B., Peshkin, D.G., Selecting a Preventive Maintenance Treatment for Flexible Pavements. 2000, FHWA, Washington, DC.
29. Huang, Y., Bird, R., Heidrich, O., Development of a life cycle assessment tool for construction and maintenance of asphalt pavements. J. Clean. Prod. 17 (2009), 283–296, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2008.06.005.
30. IEA, World Energy Outlook. 2016, International Energy Agency, Paris.
31. Ilustre Municipalidad de Santiago, Pehuenche, C.L., Contrato a serie de precios unitarios. Trabajos de pavimentación y reparaciones de aceras, calzadas y trabajos complementarios en calles y espacios públicos de la comuna de Santiago y/o en sectores administrados por la I. 2012, Municipalidad de Santiago, Santiago, Chile.
32. IPCC, Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Disclaimer Contribution of Working Group III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change., 2007, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
33. Karan, M.A., Christison, T.J., Cheetham, A., Berdahl, G., Development and implementation of Alberta's pavement information and needs system. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 938 (1983), 11–20.
34. Khurshid, M.B., Irfan, M., Labi, S., Comparison of methods for evaluating pavement interventions: evaluation and case study. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2108 (2009), 25–36.
35. Marceau, M.L., Nisbet, M.A., VanGeem, M.G., Life Cycle Inventory of Portland Cement Manufacture. 2006, Portland Cement Association.
36. Marler, R.T., Arora, J.S., Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Struct. Multidiscip. Optim. 26 (2004), 369–395, 10.1007/s00158-003-0368-6.
37. Meneses, S., Ferreira, A., Flexible pavement maintenance programming considering the minimisation of maintenance and rehabilitation costs and the maximisation of the residual value of pavements. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 16:7 (2015), 571–586, 10.1080/10298436.2014.943207.
38. Ministerio de Desarrollo Social, Precios sociales para la evaluación social de proyectos. 2014, Ministerio de Desarrollo Social, Santiago, Chile.
39. MINVU (Ministerio de Urbanismo y Vivienda), Diagnostico Vial - Región Metropolitana, Cobertura y Déficit de Pavimentación. Unidad de Pavimentación. 2008, Dpto. Planes y Programas. ed, Santiago, Chile.
40. MOP (Ministerio Obras Públicas de Chile), Evaluación técnica económica de la red vial pavimentada. 2012, Departamento de Gestión Vial. Subdireccion de Desarrollo. Dirección de Vialidad, Santiago, Chile.
41. MOP (Ministerio Obras Públicas de Chile), Proposiciones de acciones de mantenimiento y estado de la calzada y bermas para caminos pavimentados de la red vial nacional. 2012, Departamento de Gestión Vial. Subdireccion de Desarrollo. Dirección de Vialidad, Santiago, Chile.
42. MOP (Ministerio Obras Públicas de Chile), Precios unitarios de acciones de conservación de caminos y carreteras. 2012, Dirección de Vialidad, Ministerio de Obras Públicas de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
43. Nathman, R., McNeil, S., Van Dam, T.J., Integrating environmental perspectives into pavement management: adding the pavement life-cycle assessment tool for environmental and economic effects to the decision-making toolbox. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2093 (2009), 40–49.
44. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, U.S. Life Cycle Inventory Database. 2011, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado, USA.
45. Osorio, A., Development of Performance Models and Maintenance Standards of Urban Pavements for Network Management. 2015, University of Waterloo and Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
46. Osorio, A., Chamorro, A., Tighe, S., Videla, C., Calibration and validation of condition indicator for managing urban pavement networks. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2455 (2014), 28–36, 10.3141/2455-04.
47. Osorio, A., Chamorro, A., Tighe, S.L., Videla, C., Development of performance models of urban pavements for network analysis. Transportation Research Board 94st Annual Meeting, 2015, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, 1–19.
48. PE International, GaBi Software. 2011 http://www.gabi-software.com/ (Dec. 26, 2016).
49. Pellicer, E., Sierra, L.A., Yepes, V., Appraisal of infrastructure sustainability by graduate students using an active-learning method. J. Clean. Prod. 113 (2016), 884–896, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.010.
50. Peshkin, D.G., Hoerner, T.E., Zimmerman, K.A., Optimal Timing of Pavement Preventive Maintenance Treatment Applications. NCHRP Report 523, 2004, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC.
51. Reger, D., Madanat, S., Horvath, A., The effect of agency budgets on minimizing greenhouse gas emissions from road rehabilitation policies. Environ. Res. Lett., 10(11), 2015, 114007 http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/10/11/114007.
52. Robinette, C., Epps, J., Energy, emissions, material conservation, and prices associated with construction, rehabilitation, and material alternatives for flexible pavement. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 2179 (2010), 10–22, 10.3141/2179-02.
53. Santero, N., Loijos, A., Ochsendorf, J., Greenhouse gas emissions reduction opportunities for concrete pavements. J. Ind. Ecol. 17 (2013), 859–868, 10.1111/jiec.12053.
54. Santero, N., Masanet, E., Horvath, A., Life-cycle assessment of pavements. Part I: critical review. Resour. Conserv. Recycl 55 (2011), 801–809, 10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.03.010.
55. Santos, J., Ferreira, A., Flintsch, G., A life cycle assessment model for pavement management: methodology and computational framework. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 16 (2015), 268–286, 10.1080/10298436.2014.942861.
56. Schliesser, A., Bull, A., Caminos: Un Nuevo Enfoque para la Gestión y Conservación de Redes Viales. 1992, Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), United Nations, Santiago, Chile.
57. Schvallinger, M., Analyzing Trends of Asphalt Recycling in France. Master of Science Thesis, 2011, KTH, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm, Sweden.
58. Shafizadeh, K., Mannering, F., Acceptability of pavement roughness on urban highways by driving public. Transp. Res. Rec. J. Transp. Res. Board 1860 (2003), 187–193, 10.3141/1860-21.
59. Shahin, M.Y., Pavement Management for Airports, Roads, and Parking Lots. 2005, Springer, New York.
60. Sims, R., Schaeffer, R., Creutzig, F., Cruz-Núñez, X., D'Agosto, M., Dimitriu, D., Figueroa Meza, M.J., Fulton, L., Kobayashi, S., Lah, A., McKinnon, A., Newman, P., Ouyang, M., Schauer, J.J., Sperling, D., Tiwari, G., Transport. Climate Chang 2014: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III for the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, 2014, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
61. Stripple, H., Life Cycle Assessment of Road: a Pilot Study for Inventory Analysis. IVL Report B1210E, 2001, Swedish Environmental Research Institute, Gothenburg, Sweden.
62. TAC, Pavement Asset Design and Management Guide. 2013, Transportation Association of Canada, Ontario.
63. Tighe, S., Gransberg, D.D., Sustainable Pavement Maintenance Practices (No. NCHRP Research Results Digest 365). 2011, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington D.C., USA.
64. Torres-Machi, C., Chamorro, A., Yepes, V., Pellicer, E., Current models and practices of economic and environmental evaluation for sustainable network-level pavement management. Rev. Constr. 13 (2014), 49–56 http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0718-915X2014000200006.
65. Torres-Machi, C., Chamorro, A., Videla, C., Pellicer, E., Yepes, V., An iterative approach for the optimization of pavement maintenance management at the network level. Sci. World J., 2014, 2014, 524329, 10.1155/2014/524329.
66. TRL Limited, Asphalt Pavement Embodied Carbon Tool - AsPECT, Version 2.0. 2009.
67. Tsunokawa, K., Van Hiep, D., Ul-Islam, R., True optimization of pavement maintenance options with what-if models. Comput.-Aided Civ. Infrastruct. Eng. 21 (2006), 193–204, 10.1111/j.1467-8667.2006.00427.x.
68. Turk, J., Mauko Pranjić, A., Mladenovič, A., Cotič, Z., Jurjavčič, P., Environmental comparison of two alternative road pavement rehabilitation techniques: cold-in-place-recycling versus traditional reconstruction. J. Clean. Prod. 121 (2016), 45–55, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.02.040.
69. Videla, C., Chamorro, A., Mourgues, C., Gillmore, R., Investigación y Desarrollo de Soluciones para la Gestión de Pavimentos Urbanos en Chile (Research project proposal). 2010, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
70. Wang, T., Lee, I.-S., Kendall, A., Harvey, J., Lee, E.-B., Kim, C., Life cycle energy consumption and GHG emission from pavement rehabilitation with different rolling resistance. J. Clean. Prod. 33 (2012), 86–96.
71. Wu, Z., Flintsch, G., Pavement preservation optimization considering multiple objectives and budget variability. J. Transp. Eng. 135 (2009), 305–315, 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000006.
72. Wu, Z., Groeger, J.L., Simpson, A.L., Hicks, R.G., Performance Evaluation of Various Rehabilitation and Preservation Treatments (No. FHWA-HIF-10-020). 2010, FHWA, Office of Asset Management, Washington, DC.
73. Wu, Z., Flintsch, G., Ferreira, A., Picado-Santos, L., Framework for multiobjective optimization of physical highway assets investments. J. Transp. Eng. 138 (2012), 1411–1421, 10.1061/(ASCE)TE.1943-5436.0000458.
74. Yepes, V., Medina, J., Economic heuristic optimization for heterogeneous fleet VRPHESTW. J. Transp. Eng. 132 (2006), 303–311, 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-947X(2006)132 4(303).
75. Yepes, V., Torres-Machi, C., Chamorro, A., Pellicer, E., Optimal pavement maintenance programs based on a hybrid greedy randomized adaptive search procedure algorithm. J. Civ. Eng. Manag. 22 (2016), 540–550, 10.3846/13923730.2015.1120770.