Flexible pavement maintenance programming considering the minimisation of maintenance and rehabilitation costs and the maximisation of the residual value of pavements

International Journal of Pavement Engineering

Volumn 16, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 571-586

  Meneses, Susana ^a   Ferreira, Adelino ^b  

^a POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COIMBRA   (Portugal)

Author keywords

life cycle costs; maintenance; multi objective optimisation; Pavement management; rehabilitation; residual value of pavements

Indexed keywords

DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; LIFE CYCLE; MAINTENANCE; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; PATIENT REHABILITATION; PAVEMENTS;

DETERMINISTIC PAVEMENT PERFORMANCE MODELS; FLEXIBLE PAVEMENT DESIGNS; FLEXIBLE PAVEMENTS; LIFECYCLE COSTS; MAINTENANCE AND REHABILITATIONS; MULTIOBJECTIVE DECISION; PAVEMENT MANAGEMENT; RESIDUAL VALUE;

COSTS;

EID: 84929951986     PISSN: 10298436     EISSN: 1477268X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2014.943207     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. AASHTO. 1993. Guide for design of pavement structures. 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, 1-640.
2. AIPCR. 2000. Highway development and management, volume one: overview of HDM-4. Paris: World Road Association, 1-53.
3. Andersson, P., 2007. Multi-year maintenance optimisation for paved public roads: segment based modelling and price-directive decomposition. Thesis (PhD). Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 1-214.
4. C-SHRP. 2002. Pavement structural design practices across. Ottawa: Canadian Strategic Highway Research Program, 1-10. C-SHRP Technical Brief No. 23.
5. CRP. 2013. Proceedings of the 7th Portuguese road conference. CD ed. Lisboa: Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil.
6. Das, I., 1999. On characterizing the knee of the Pareto curve based on normal boundary intersection. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 18, 107-115.
7. David, J., et al., 2006. Professional visual studio 2005 team system. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing, Inc, 1-660.
8. Deb, K., 2008. Multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. West Sussex: Wiley, 1-515.
9. Ferreira, A., 2001. Pavement maintenance optimisation of road networks. Thesis (PhD), Coimbra University, Coimbra, Portugal, 1-383 (in Portuguese).
10. Ferreira, A., Picado-Santos, L., and Antunes, A., 2002. A segment-linked optimization model for deterministic pavement management systems. The International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 3 (2), 95-105.
11. Ferreira, A., Meneses, S., and Vicente, F., 2009. Pavement management system for Oliveira do Hospital, Portugal. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, 162 (3), 157-169.
12. Ferreira, A., et al., 2008. Analysis of pavement performance models for use in pavement management systems. In: Proceedings of the third European pavement and asset management conference. CD ed. Coimbra, Portugal, 1-10. Paper 1136.pdf.
13. Ferreira, A., et al., 2011. Selection of pavement performance models for use in the Portuguese PMS. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 12 (1), 87-97.
14. FICO. 2009. Xpress-optimizer: reference manual, release 20.00. Leamington Spa: Fair Isaac Corporation, 1-470.
15. Fwa, T., Chan, W., and Hoque, K., 2000. Multiobjective optimization for pavement maintenance programming. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 126 (5), 367-374.
16. Gendreau, M., and Potvin, J., 2005. Metaheuristics in combinatorial optimization. Annals of Operations Research, 140 (1), 189-213.
17. Haas, R., 2014. Reinventing the (pavement management) wheel. In: Distinguished lecture, 5th international conference on managing pavements. Available from: http://www.asphalt.org/Pubs/PubsO.html.
18. Hoffmann, A., et al., 2006. Derivative-free generation and interpolation of convex Pareto optimal IMRT plans. Physics in Medicine and Biology, 51 (24), 6349-6369.
19. Holland, J., 1975. Adaptation in natural and artificial systems. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
20. Horta, C., et al., 2013. The EP's pavement management system: balance of a consolidated implementation. In: Proceedings of the 7th Portuguese road conference. CD ed. Lisboa: Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, 1-10. Paper 149-Art-T5-7CRP-2013.pdf.
21. Hwang, C., and Masud, A., 1979. Multiple objective decision making: methods and applications: a state-of-the-art survey. Berlin: Springer.
22. IBM. 2009. IBM ILOG CPLEX 12.1: reference manual. Armonk, NY: IBM Corporation, 1-884.
23. Ihs, A., and Sjögren, L., 2003. An overview of HDM-4 and the Swedish pavement management system. Linköping: VTI-Infrastructure Maintenance, 1-31.
24. Iniestra, J., and Gutiérrez, J., 2009. Multi-criteria decisions on interdependent infrastructure transportation projects using an evolutionary-based framework. Applied Soft Computing, 9 (2), 512-526.
25. Lang, J., and Dahlgren, J., 2001. Prediction model in the Swedish PMS. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on managing pavements. CD ed. Seattle, WA 1-10. Paper 100.pdf.
26. Lang, J., and Potucek, J., 2001. Pavement management systems in Sweden. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on managing pavements. CD ed. Seattle, WA 1-12. Paper 097.pdf.
27. Lotfi, F., et al., 2007. A new method for complex decision making based on TOPSIS for complex decision making problems with fuzzy data. Applied Mathematical Sciences, 1 (60), 2981-2987.
28. Marler, R., and Arora, J., 2004. Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 26, 369-395.
29. Meneses, S., and Ferreira, A., 2013. Pavement maintenance programming considering two objectives: maintenance costs and user costs. International Journal of Pavement Engineering, 14 (2), 206-221.
30. Meneses, S., Ferreira, A., and Collop, A., 2013. Multi-objective decision-aid tool for pavement management. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Transport, 166 (2), 79-94.
31. Michalewicz, Z., and Fogel, D., 2004. How to solve it: modern heuristics. Berlin: Springer.
32. Miettinen, K., 1999. Nonlinear multi-objective optimization. Boston, MA: Kluwer, 1-324.
33. Mostafavi, A., and Karamouz, M., 2010. Selecting appropriate project delivery system: fuzzy approach with risk analysis. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136 (8), 923-930.
34. Picado-Santos, L., and Ferreira, A., 2007. Development and implementation of a new pavement management system. In: Proceedings of the fifth international symposium on maintenance and rehabilitation of pavements and technological control. CD ed. Utah, USA, 433-438.
35. Picado-Santos, L., and Ferreira, A., 2008. Contributions to the development of the Portuguese road administration's pavement management system. In: Proceedings of the third European pavement and asset management conference. CD ed. Coimbra, Portugal, 1-10. Paper 1138.pdf.
36. Picado-Santos, L., et al., 2006. The evaluation of maintenance and rehabilitation strategies in the pavement management system of the Portuguese road administration. In: Proceedings of the 4th Portuguese road congress. Lisbon, Portugal (in Portuguese), 1-10.
37. Randolph, N., and Gardner, D., 2008. Professional visual studio 2008. Indianapolis, IN: Wiley Publishing, Inc., 1-946.
38. Stephenson, M., Epps, R., and Kennedy, C., 2004. Development of deterioration models for local authority roads. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer, 157 (3), 167-172.
39. Trindade, M., and Horta, C., 2009. Pavement management system of Estradas de Portugal, S.A. In: Proceedings of the 15th Congreso Ibero-Latinoamericano del Asfalto. CD ed. Lisboa, Portugal (in Portuguese). 1351-1360.
40. Wang, F., Zhang, Z., and Machemehl, R., 2003. Decision making problem for managing pavement maintenance and rehabilitation projects. Transportation Research Record, 1853, 21-28.
41. Wu, Z., and Flintsch, G., 2009. Pavement preservation optimization considering multiple objectives and budget variability. Journal of Transportation Engineering, 135 (5), 305-315.
42. Yuan, J., et al., 2010. Performance objectives selection model in public-private partnership projects based on the perspective of stakeholders. Journal of Management in Engineering, 26 (2), 89-104.