Clinical outcome of root caries restorations using ART and rotary techniques in institutionalized elders

Brazilian Oral Research

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 1-8

  Gonzalez, Alberto Carlos Cruz ^a   Zuluaga, Dairo Javier Marín ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DE COLOMBIA   (Colombia)

Author keywords

Aged; Dental Atraumatic Restorative Treatment; Glass Ionomer Cements; Root Caries

Indexed keywords

GLASS IONOMER;

AGED; ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTAL DEVICE; DENTAL PROCEDURE; DENTAL RESTORATION; DEVICES; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING HOME; PROCEDURES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROOT CARIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; DENTAL ATRAUMATIC RESTORATIVE TREATMENT; DENTAL CARE FOR AGED; DENTAL INSTRUMENTS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; FEMALE; GLASS IONOMER CEMENTS; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NURSING HOMES; ROOT CARIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 85014683320     PISSN: 18068324     EISSN: 18073107     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2016.VOL30.0063     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. 1. Samson H, Strand GV, Haugejorden O. Change in oral health status among the institutionalized Norwegian elderly over a period of 16 years. Acta Odontol Scand. 2008;66(6):368-73. doi:10.1080/00016350802378654
2. 2. De Visschere LM, van der Putten GJ, Vanobbergen JN, Schols JM, de Baat C; Dutch Association of Nursing Home Physicians. An oral health care guideline for institutionalised older people. Gerodontology. 2011;28(4):307-10. doi:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2010.00406.x
3. 3. Matthews DC, Clovis JB, Brillant MG, Filiaggi MJ, McNally ME, Kotzer RD, et al. Oral health status of long-term care residents-a vulnerable population. J Can Dent Assoc 2012;78:c3.
4. 4. Marín Zuluaga DJ, Ferreira J, Gil-Montoya JA, Willumsen T. Oral health in institutionalised elderly people in Oslo, Norway and its relationship with dependence and cognitive impairment. Gerodontology. 2012;29(2):e420-6. doi:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2011.00490.x
5. 5. Philip P, Rogers C, Kruger E, Tennant M. Caries experience of institutionalized elderly and its association with dementia and functional status. Int J Dent Hyg. 2012;10(2):122-7. doi:10.1111/j.1601-5037.2011.00525.x
6. 6. Tascón J. Atraumatic restorative treatment to control dental caries: history, characteristics, and contributions of the technique. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2005;17(2):110-5. Spanish. doi:10.1590/S1020-49892005000200007
7. 7. Zhang W, McGrath C, Lo EC. A comparison of root caries diagnosis based on visual-tactile criteria and DIAGNOdent in vivo. J Dent. 2009;37(7):509-13. doi:10.1016/j.jdent.2009.03.009
8. 8. Saunders RH Jr, Meyerowitz C. Dental caries in older adults. Dent Clin North Am. 2005;49(2):293-308. doi:10.1016/j.cden.2004.10.004
9. 9. Banting DW. Epidemiology of root caries. Gerodontology. 1986;5(1):5-11. doi:10.1111/j.1741-2358.1986.tb00377.x
10. 10. Fure S. Ten-year cross-sectional and incidence study of coronal and root caries and some related factors in elderly Swedish individuals. Gerodontology. 2004;21(3):130-40. doi:10.1111/j.1741-2358.2004.00025.x
11. 11. Imazato S, Ikebe K, Nokubi T, Ebisu S, Walls AW. Prevalence of root caries in a selected population of older adults in Japan. J Oral Rehabil. 2006;33(2):137-43. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01547.x
12. 12. Mamai-Homata E, Topitsoglou V, Oulis C, Margaritis V, Polychronopoulou A. Risk indicators of coronal and root caries in Greek middle aged adults and senior citizens. BMC Public Health. 2012;12(1):484. doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-484
13. 13. Hara AT, Magalhães CS, Serra MC, Rodrigues Jr AL. Cariostatic effect of fluoride-containing restorative systems associated with dentifrices on root dentin. J Dent. 2002;30(5-6):205-12. doi:10.1016/S0300-5712(02)00017-9
14. 14. Zanata RL, Navarro MFL. International symposium of Atraumatic Restorative Treatment: proceedings of the symposium held on 4-5 June 2004 at Bauru Dental School, Bauru, Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14 Spec No:1. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572006000700001
15. 15. Navarro MFL, Modena KCS, Freitas MCCA, Fagundes TC. Transferring ART research into education in Brazil. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17 Spe No:99-105. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572009000700017
16. 16. Navarro MFL. Introduction to the symposium. Two decades of ART: success through research. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17 Spe No:76-7. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572009000700013
17. 17. Molina GF, Cabral RJ, Frencken JE. The ART approach: clinical aspects reviewed. J Appl Oral Sci. 2009;17 Spe No:89-98. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572009000700016
18. 18. Greene JC, Vermillion JR. The Simplified Oral Hygiene Index. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964;68(1):7-13. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.1964.0034
19. 19. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, et al. The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2007;35(3):170-8. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.2007.00347.x
20. 20. Emilson CG. Susceptibility of various microorganisms to chlorhexidine. Scand J Dent Res. 1977;85(4):255-65.
21. 21. Bowden GH, Ekstrand J, McNaughton B, Challacombe SJ. Association of selected bacteria with the lesions of root surface caries. Oral Microbiol Immunol. 1990;5(6):346-51. doi:10.1111/j.1399-302X.1990.tb00439.x
22. 22. Frencken JE, Makoni F, Sithole WD. ART restorations and glass ionomer sealants in Zimbabwe: survival after 3 years. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1998;26(6):372-81. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0528.1998.tb01975.x
23. 23. Bayne SC, Schmalz G. Reprinting the classic article on USPHS evaluation methods for measuring the clinical research performance of restorative materials. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9(4):209-14. doi:10.1007/s00784-005-0017-0
24. 24. Cvar JF, Ryge G. Reprint of criteria for the clinical evaluation of dental restorative materials. 1971. Clin Oral Investig. 2005;9(4):215-32. doi:10.1007/s00784-005-0018-z
25. 25. Lo EC, Luo Y, Tan HP, Dyson JE, Corbet EF. ART and conventional root restorations in elders after 12 months. J Dent Res. 2006;85(10):929-32. doi:10.1177/154405910608501011
26. 26. Amorim RG, Leal SC, Frencken JE. Survival of atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) sealants and restorations: a meta-analysis. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(2):429-41. doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0513-3
27. 27. Gil-Montoya JA, Mateos-Palacios R, Bravo M, González-Moles MA, Pulgar R. Atraumatic restorative treatment and Carisolv use for root caries in the elderly: 2-year follow-up randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;18(4):1089-95. doi:10.1007/s00784-013-1087-z
28. 28. Mickenautsch S, Grossman E. Atraumatic Restorative Treatment (ART): factors affecting success. J Appl Oral Sci. 2006;14 Spe No:34-6. doi:10.1590/S1678-77572006000700008
29. 29. Covey DA, Ewoldsen NO. Porosity in manually and machine mixed resin-modified glass ionomer cements. Oper Dent. 2001;26(6):617-23.
30. 30. Mickenautsch S, Yengopal V, Banerjee A. Atraumatic restorative treatment versus amalgam restoration longevity: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2010;14(3):233-40. doi:10.1007/s00784-009-0335-8
31. 31. Ewoldsen N, Covey D, Lavin M. The physical and adhesive properties of dental cements used for atraumatic restorative treatment. Spec Care Dentist. 1997;17(1):19-24. doi:10.1111/j.1754-4505.1997.tb00531.x
32. 32. Lopez N, Simpser-Rafalin S, Berthold P. Atraumatic restorative treatment for prevention and treatment of caries in an underserved community. Am J Public Health. 2005;95(8):1338-9. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2004.056945
33. 33. Franca C, Colares V, van Amerongen E. The operator as a factor of success in ART restorations. Braz J Oral Sci. 2011;10(1):60-4.
34. 34. Kemoli AM, Amerongen WE. Effects of oral hygiene, residual caries and cervical Marginal-gaps on the survival of proximal atraumatic restorative treatment approach restorations. Contemp Clin Dent. 2011;2(4):318-23. doi:10.4103/0976-237X.91796
35. 35. Francisconi LF, Graeff MS, Martins LM, Franco EB, Mondelli RF, Francisconi PA, et al. The effects of occlusal loading on the margins of cervical restorations. J Am Dent Assoc. 2009;140(10):1275-82. doi:10.14219/jada.archive.2009.0051