Ecosystem service bundles along the urban-rural gradient: Insights for landscape planning and management

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 24, Issue , 2017, Pages 147-159

  Baró, Francesc ^a,b   Gómez Baggethun, Erik ^c,d   Haase, Dagmar ^e,f  

^a INSTITUT DE CIÈNCIA I TECNOLOGIA AMBIENTALS   (Spain)

^b HOSPITAL DEL MAR   (Spain)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^d NORWEGIAN INSTITUTE FOR NATURE RESEARCH   (Norway)

^e HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^f HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

Author keywords

Barcelona metropolitan region; Ecosystem service mismatch; Green infrastructure; Spatial analysis; Urban rural gradient

Indexed keywords

EID: 85014461012     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.02.021     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Ala-Hulkko, T., Kotavaara, O., Alahuhta, J., Helle, P., Hjort, J., Introducing accessibility analysis in mapping cultural ecosystem services. Ecol. Indic. 66 (2016), 416–427, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.013.
2. Barcelona City Council, 2013. Barcelona Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Plan 2020. Retrieved from: http://www.bcn.cat/mediambient.
3. Baró, F., Chaparro, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Langemeyer, J., Nowak, D., Terradas, J., Contribution of ecosystem services to air quality and climate change mitigation policies: the case of urban forests in Barcelona, Spain. Ambio 43 (2014), 466–479, 10.1007/s13280-014-0507-x.
4. Baró, F., Haase, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Frantzeskaki, N., Mismatches between ecosystem services supply and demand in urban areas: a quantitative assessment in five European cities. Ecol. Indic. 55 (2015), 146–158, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.013.
5. Baró, F., Palomo, I., Zulian, G., Vizcaino, P., Haase, D., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Mapping ecosystem service capacity, flow and demand for landscape and urban planning: a case study in the Barcelona metropolitan region. Land Use Policy 57 (2016), 405–417, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.06.006.
6. Barthel, S., Isendahl, C., Urban gardens, agriculture, and water management: sources of resilience for long-term food security in cities. Ecol. Econ. 86 (2013), 224–234, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.06.018.
7. Bennett, E.M., Peterson, G.D., Gordon, L.J., Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 12 (2009), 1394–1404, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2009.01387.x.
8. Bolund, P., Hunhammar, S., Ecosystem services in urban areas. Ecol. Econ. 29 (1999), 293–301, 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00013-0.
9. Brandt, J., Vejre, H., Multifunctional Landscapes – motives, concepts and perspectives. Brandt, J., Vejre, H., (eds.) Multifunctional Landscapes. Volume 1: Theory, Values and History, 2003, WIT press, Southampton, UK, 3–31.
10. Brown, G., Fagerholm, N., Empirical PPGIS/PGIS mapping of ecosystem services: a review and evaluation. Ecosyst. Serv. 13 (2015), 119–133, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.10.007.
11. Burkhard, B., Kroll, F., Nedkov, S., Müller, F., Mapping ecosystem service supply, demand and budgets. Ecol. Indic. 21 (2012), 17–29, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2011.06.019.
12. Burkhard, B., Kandziora, M., Hou, Y., Müller, F., Ecosystem service potentials, flows and demands – concepts for spatial localisation, indication and quantification. Landsc. Online 32 (2014), 1–32, 10.3097/LO.201434.
13. Camps-Calvet, M., Langemeyer, J., Calvet-Mir, L., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Ecosystem services provided by urban gardens in Barcelona, Spain: insights for policy and planning. Environ. Sci. Policy 62 (2016), 14–23, 10.1016/j.envsci.2016.01.007.
14. Castro, A.J., Verburg, P.H., Martín-López, B., Garcia-Llorente, M., Cabello, J., Vaughn, C.C., López, E., Ecosystem service trade-offs from supply to social demand: a landscape-scale spatial analysis. Landsc. Urban Plan. 132 (2014), 102–110, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.08.009.
15. Catalán, B., Saurí, D., Serra, P., Urban sprawl in the Mediterranean?. Landsc. Urban Plan. 85 (2008), 174–184, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.11.004.
16. Chan, K.M.A., Shaw, M.R., Cameron, D.R., Underwood, E.C., Daily, G.C., Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLoS Biol., 4, 2006, e379, 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040379.
17. Costanza, R., Ecosystem services: multiple classification systems are needed. Biol. Conserv. 141 (2008), 350–352.
18. Crossman, N.D., Burkhard, B., Nedkov, S., Willemen, L., Petz, K., Palomo, I., Drakou, E.G., Martín-Lopez, B., McPhearson, T., Boyanova, K., Alkemade, R., Egoh, B., Dunbar, M.B., Maes, J., A blueprint for mapping and modelling ecosystem services. Ecosyst. Serv. 4 (2013), 4–14, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.02.001.
19. Depietri, Y., Kallis, G., Baró, F., Cattaneo, C., The urban political ecology of ecosystem services: the case of Barcelona. Ecol. Econ. 125 (2016), 83–100, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.003.
20. Derkzen, M.L., van Teeffelen, A.J.A., Verburg, P.H., Quantifying urban ecosystem services based on high-resolution data of urban green space: an assessment for Rotterdam, the Netherlands. J. Appl. Ecol. 52 (2015), 1020–1032, 10.1111/1365-2664.12469.
21. EC (European Commission), 2013. Green Infrastructure (GI) - Enhancing Europe's Natural Capital. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. COM (2013) 249 Final. Brussels. Retrieved from: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A52013DC0249.
22. Egoh, B., Drakou, E.G., Dunbar, M.B., Maes, J., 2012. Indicators for mapping ecosystem services: a review. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. 111 pp. doi: 10.2788/41823.
23. Eigenbrod, F., Armsworth, P.R., Anderson, B.J., Heinemeyer, A., Gillings, S., Roy, D.B., Thomas, C.D., Gaston, K.J., The impact of proxy-based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J. Appl. Ecol. 47 (2010), 377–385, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01777.x.
24. Escobedo, F.J., Varela, S., Zhao, M., Wagner, J.E., Zipperer, W., Analyzing the efficacy of subtropical urban forests in offsetting carbon emissions from cities. Environ. Sci. Policy 13 (2010), 362–372.
25. FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization), Global food losses and food waste – Extent, causes and prevention., 2011 Retrieved from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/mb060e/mb060e.pdfRome.
26. Feldmann, C., Hamm, U., Consumers’ perceptions and preferences for local food: a review. Food Qual. Prefer. 40:Part A (2015), 152–164, 10.1016/j.foodqual.2014.09.014.
27. Fisher, B., Turner, R.K., Morling, P., Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecol. Econ. 68 (2009), 643–653.
28. Folke, C., Jansson, A., Larsson, J., Costanza, R., Ecosystem appropriation by cities. Ambio 26 (1997), 167–172.
29. García-Nieto, A.P., García-Llorente, M., Iniesta-Arandia, I., Martín-López, B., Mapping forest ecosystem services: from providing units to beneficiaries. Ecosyst. Serv. 4 (2013), 126–138, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.03.003.
30. Geijzendorffer, I.R., Martín-López, B., Roche, P.K., Improving the identification of mismatches in ecosystem services assessments. Ecol. Indic. 52 (2015), 320–331, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.12.016.
31. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Mingorría, S., Reyes-García, V., Calvet, L., Montes, C., Traditional ecological knowledge trends in the transition to a market economy: empirical study in the Doñana natural areas. Conserv. Biol. 24 (2010), 721–729, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01401.x.
32. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Martín-López, B., Lomas, P., Zorrilla, P., Montes, C., Evolution of ecosystem services in a Mediterranean cultural landscape: Doñana case study, Spain (1956–2006). Sofo, A., (eds.) Biodiversity, 2011, InTech Press, 27–46.
33. Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Barton, D., Langemeyer, J., McPhearson, T., O'Farrell, P., Andersson, E., Hamstead, Z., Kremer, P., Urban ecosystem services. Elmqvist, T., Fragkias, M., Goodness, J., Güneralp, B., Marcotullio, P., McDonald, R.I., Parnell, S., Schewenius, M., Sendstad, M., Seto, K.C., Wilkinson, C., (eds.) Urbanization, Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Challenges and Opportunities, 2013, Springer, 175–251.
34. Guerra, C., Pinto-Correia, T., Metzger, M., Mapping soil erosion prevention using an ecosystem service modeling framework for integrated land management and policy. Ecosystems 17 (2014), 878–889, 10.1007/s10021-014-9766-4.
35. Haase, D., Schwarz, N., Strohbach, M., Kroll, F., Seppelt, R., Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle region, Germany. Ecol. Soc., 17(3), 2012, 22, 10.5751/ES-04853-170322.
36. Haase, D., Larondelle, N., Andersson, E., Artmann, M., Borgström, S., Breuste, J., Gomez-Baggethun, E., Gren, Å., Hamstead, Z., Hansen, R., Kabisch, N., Kremer, P., Langemeyer, J., Rall, E., McPhearson, T., Pauleit, S., Qureshi, S., Schwarz, N., Voigt, A., Wurster, D., Elmqvist, T., A quantitative review of urban ecosystem service assessments: concepts, models, and implementation. Ambio 43 (2014), 413–433, 10.1007/s13280-014-0504-0.
37. Hamann, M., Biggs, R., Reyers, B., Mapping social–ecological systems: identifying “green-loop” and “red-loop” dynamics based on characteristic bundles of ecosystem service use. Glob. Environ. Chang. 34 (2015), 218–226, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.07.008.
38. Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Aguilera, P.A., Montes, C., Martín-López, B., Socio-cultural valuation of ecosystem services: uncovering the links between values, drivers of change, and human well-being. Ecol. Econ. 108 (2014), 36–48, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.028.
39. Kroll, F., Müller, F., Haase, D., Fohrer, N., Rural–urban gradient analysis of ecosystem services supply and demand dynamics. Land Use Policy 29 (2012), 521–535, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2011.07.008.
40. Larondelle, N., Haase, D., Urban ecosystem services assessment along a rural–urban gradient: a cross-analysis of European cities. Ecol. Indic. 29 (2013), 179–190, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.12.022.
41. Lin, B.B., Fuller, R.A., FORUM: Sharing or sparing? How should we grow the world's cities?. J. Appl. Ecol. 50 (2013), 1161–1168, 10.1111/1365-2664.12118.
42. Liu, C., Li, X., Carbon storage and sequestration by urban forests in Shenyang, China. Urban For. Urban Green. 11 (2012), 121–128, 10.1016/j.ufug.2011.03.002.
43. Maes, J., Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Dunbar, M.B., Alkemade, R., Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol. Conserv. 155 (2012), 1–12, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.016.
44. Maes, J., Barbosa, A., Baranzelli, C., Zulian, G., e Silva, F., Vandecasteele, I., Hiederer, R., Liquete, C., Paracchini, M.L., Mubareka, S., Jacobs-Crisioni, C., Castillo, C.P., Lavalle, C., More green infrastructure is required to maintain ecosystem services under current trends in land-use change in Europe. Landsc. Ecol. 30 (2015), 517–534, 10.1007/s10980-014-0083-2.
45. Malinga, R., Gordon, L.J., Jewitt, G., Lindborg, R., Mapping ecosystem services across scales and continents – a review. Ecosyst. Serv. 13 (2015), 57–63, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.01.006.
46. Martín-López, B., Iniesta-Arandia, I., García-Llorente, M., Palomo, I., Casado-Arzuaga, I., Amo, D.G..Del., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Oteros-Rozas, E., Palacios-Agundez, I., Willaarts, B., González, J.A., Santos-Martín, F., Onaindia, M., López-Santiago, C., Montes, C., Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE, 7, 2012, e38970.
47. Marull, J., Pino, J., Tello, E., Cordobilla, M.J., Social metabolism, landscape change and land-use planning in the Barcelona Metropolitan Region. Land Use Policy 27 (2010), 497–510, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.07.004.
48. Mouchet, M.A., Lamarque, P., Martín-López, B., Crouzat, E., Gos, P., Byczek, C., Lavorel, S., An interdisciplinary methodological guide for quantifying associations between ecosystem services. Glob. Environ. Chang. 28 (2014), 298–308, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.07.012.
49. Natural England, 2010. Nature Nearby’ Accessible Natural Greenspace Guidance. pp. 98. Retrieved from: http://publications.naturalengland.org.uk/publication/40004?category=47004.
50. Otero, I., Boada, M., Tàbara, J.D., Social–ecological heritage and the conservation of Mediterranean landscapes under global change. A case study in Olzinelles (Catalonia). Land Use Policy 30 (2013), 25–37, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.02.005.
51. Paracchini, M.L., Zulian, G., Kopperoinen, L., Maes, J., Schägner, J.P., Termansen, M., Zandersen, M., Perez-Soba, M., Scholefield, P.A., Bidoglio, G., Mapping cultural ecosystem services: a framework to assess the potential for outdoor recreation across the EU. Ecol. Indic. 45 (2014), 371–385, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.04.018.
52. Pino, J., 2007. Primera proposta de bases cartogràfiques, criteris i mètodes per a l'avaluació de l'estat ecològic del bosc a l’àmbit SITxell i de les seves tendències a curt termini. Unpublished report for the Barcelona Regional Council.
53. PTGC (Territorial General Plan of Catalonia), 1995. Pla Territorial General de Catalunya. Retrieved from http://territori.gencat.cat/ca/01_departament/05_plans/ 01_planificacio_territorial/plans_territorials_nou/pla_territorial_general.
54. PTMB (Territorial Metropolitan Plan of Barcelona), 2010. Pla Territorial Metropolità de Barcelona. Retrieved from http://territori.gencat.cat/ca/01_departament/05_plans/ 01_planificacio_territorial/plans_territorials_nou/territorials_parcials/ptp_metropolita_de_barcelona/.
55. Queiroz, C., Meacham, M., Richter, K., Norström, A.V., Andersson, E., Norberg, J., Peterson, G., Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape. Ambio 44 (2015), 89–101, 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0.
56. R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2015, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria ISBN 3-900051-07-0, URL: http://www.R-project.org/.
57. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., Peterson, G.D., Bennett, E.M., Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107 (2010), 5242–5247, 10.1073/pnas.0907284107.
58. Rees, W.E., Ecological footprints and appropriated carrying capacity: what urban economics leaves out. Environ. Urban. 4 (1992), 121–130, 10.1177/095624789200400212.
59. Renard, D., Rhemtulla, J.M., Bennett, E.M., Historical dynamics in ecosystem service bundles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 112 (2015), 13411–13416, 10.1073/pnas.1502565112.
60. Schipperijn, J., Ekholm, O., Stigsdotter, U.K., Toftager, M., Bentsen, P., Kamper-Jørgensen, F., Randrup, T.B., Factors influencing the use of green space: results from a Danish national representative survey. Landsc. Urban Plan. 95 (2010), 130–137.
61. Schröter, M., Barton, D.N., Remme, R.P., Hein, L., Accounting for capacity and flow of ecosystem services: a conceptual model and a case study for Telemark, Norway. Ecol. Indic. 36 (2014), 539–551, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2013.09.018.
62. Seitzinger, S., Svedin, U., Crumley, C., Steffen, W., Abdullah, S., Alfsen, C., Broadgate, W., Biermann, F., Bondre, N., Dearing, J., Deutsch, L., Dhakal, S., Elmqvist, T., Farahbakhshazad, N., Gaffney, O., Haberl, H., Lavorel, S., Mbow, C., McMichael, A., deMorais, J.F., Olsson, P., Pinho, P., Seto, K., Sinclair, P., Stafford Smith, M., Sugar, L., Planetary stewardship in an urbanizing world: beyond city limits. Ambio 41 (2012), 787–794, 10.1007/s13280-012-0353-7.
63. Stott, I., Soga, M., Inger, R., Gaston, K.J., Land sparing is crucial for urban ecosystem services. Front. Ecol. Environ. 13 (2015), 387–393, 10.1890/140286.
64. Syrbe, R.U., Walz, U., Spatial indicators for the assessment of ecosystem services: providing, benefiting and connecting areas and landscape metrics. Ecol. Indic. 21 (2012), 80–88, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2012.02.013.
65. Turkelboom F., Thoonen, M., Jacobs, S., García-Llorente, M., Martín-López, B., Berry, P. 2016. Ecosystem services trade-offs and synergies. In: Potschin, M. and K. Jax (eds): OpenNESS Ecosystem Services Reference Book. EC FP7 Grant Agreement no. 308428. Available via: www.openness-project.eu/library/reference-book.
66. Villamagna, A.M., Angermeier, P.L., Bennett, E.M., Capacity, pressure, demand, and flow: a conceptual framework for analyzing ecosystem service provision and delivery. Ecol. Complex. 15 (2013), 114–121, 10.1016/j.ecocom.2013.07.004.
67. Van Herzele, A., Wiedemann, T., A monitoring tool for the provision of accessible and attractive urban green spaces. Landsc. Urban Plan. 63 (2003), 109–126, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00192-5.
68. Wolff, S., Schulp, C.J.E., Verburg, P.H., Mapping ecosystem services demand: a review of current research and future perspectives. Ecol. Indic. 55 (2015), 159–171, 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.03.016.
69. Wright, H., Understanding green infrastructure: the development of a contested concept in England. Local Environ. 16 (2011), 1003–1019, 10.1080/13549839.2011.631993.
70. Zhao, C., Sander, H.A., Quantifying and mapping the supply of and demand for carbon storage and sequestration service from urban trees. PLoS ONE, 10, 2015, e0136392.
71. Zulian, G., Polce, C., Maes, J., ESTIMAP: a GIS-based model to map ecosystem services in the European union. Ann. Di Bot. 4 (2014), 1–7, 10.4462/annbotrm-11807.