Mapping bundles of ecosystem services reveals distinct types of multifunctionality within a Swedish landscape

Ambio

Volumn 44, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 89-101

  Queiroz, Cibele ^a   Meacham, Megan ^a   Richter, Kristina ^a   Norström, Albert V ^a   Andersson, Erik ^a   Norberg, Jon ^a   Peterson, Garry ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Ecosystem services; ES bundles; Landscape management; Regional scale; Synergies; Trade offs

Indexed keywords

DATA SET; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; GIS; LANDSCAPE PLANNING; MAPPING; TRADE-OFF; URBAN AREA;

NORRSTROM; STOCKHOLM [SWEDEN]; SWEDEN;

ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; PROCEDURES; SWEDEN;

CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOLOGY; ECOSYSTEM; SWEDEN;

EID: 84920774131     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-014-0601-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andersson, E., S. Barthel, and K. Ahrné. 2007. Measuring social–ecological dynamics behind the generation of ecosystem services. Ecological Applications 17: 1267–1278.
2. Andersson, E., B. Nykvist, R. Malinga, F. Jaramillo, and R. Lindborg. 2015. A social–ecological analysis of ecosystem services in two different farming systems. AMBIO (Suppl. 1). doi:10.1007/s13280-014-0603-y.
3. Andersson, G.K.S., M. Rundlöf, H.G. Smith, and D.Q. Fuller. 2012. Organic farming improves pollination success in strawberries. PLoS ONE 7: e31599. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0031599.
4. Barthel, S., C. Folke, and J. Colding. 2010. Social–ecological memory in gardening: Retaining the capacity for management of ecosystem services. Global Environmental Change 20: 255–265.
5. Bennett, E., G. Peterson, and L. Gordon. 2009. Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecology Letters 12: 1394–1404.
6. Bivand, R., and N. Lewin-Koh. 2013. Maptools: Tools for reading and handling spatial objects. R package version 0.8-27. Retrieved 4 January, 2014, from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=maptools.
7. Carpenter, S., R. DeFries, T. Dietz, H. Mooney, S. Polasky, W. Reid, and R. Scholes. 2006. Ecology. Millennium ecosystem assessment: Research needs. Science 314: 257–258.
8. Daily, G., and P.A. Matson. 2008. Ecosystem services: From theory to implementation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 105: 9455–9456.
9. Deal, R. L., B. Cochran, and G. LaRocco. 2012. Bundling of ecosystem services to increase forestland value and enhance sustainable forest management. Forest Policy and Economics 17: 69–76.
10. de Groot, R.S., M.A. Wilson, and R.M.J. Boumans. 2002. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecological Economics 41: 393–408.
11. Ernstson, H., S. Sörlin, and T. Elmqvist. 2008. Social movements and ecosystem services—The role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society 13: 39.
12. Ernstson, H., S. Barthel, E. Andersson, and S. Borgström. 2010. Scale-crossing brokers and network governance of urban ecosystem services: The case of Stockholm. Ecology and Society 15: 1–25.
13. Fölster, J., K. Kyllmar, M. Wallin, and S. Hellgren. 2012. Nitrogen and phosphorus trends in agricultural streams. Department of Water and Environment, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Rapport 2012:1.
14. Fraley, C., A.E. Raftery, T.B. Murphy, and L. Scrucca. 2012. mclust Version 4 for R: Normal mixture modeling for model-based clustering, classification, and density estimation. Technical Report No. 597. Department of Statistics, University of Washington.
15. Gidlöf-Gunnarsson, A., and E. Öhrström. 2007. Noise and well-being in urban residential environments: The potential role of perceived availability to nearby green areas. Landscape and Urban Planning 83: 115–126.
16. Hennig, C. 2013. fpc: Flexible procedures for clustering. R package version 2.1-6. Retrieved 4 January, 2014, from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=fpc.
17. Johnson, K.A., S. Polasky, E. Nelson, and D. Pennington. 2012. Uncertainty in ecosystem services valuation and implications for assessing land use tradeoffs: An agricultural case study in the Minnesota River Basin. Ecological Economics 79: 71–79.
18. Kareiva, P., H. Tallis, T.H. Ricketts, G.C. Daily, and S. Polasky (Eds.). 2011. Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
19. Lavorel, S., K. Grigulis, P. Lamarque, M.-P. Colace, D. Garden, J. Girel, G. Pellet, and R. Douzet. 2010. Using plant functional traits to understand the landscape distribution of multiple ecosystem services. Journal of Ecology 99: 135–147.
20. MA. 2005. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Synthesis Report. Island Press: Washington, DC.
21. Maes, J., M.L. Paracchini, G. Zulian, M.B. Dunbar, and R. Alkemade. 2012. Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biology Conservation 155: 1–12.
22. Mäler K-G., S. Aniyar, and Jansson Å. 2013. Accounting for the Value of Ecosystem Assets and Their Services. In Implementing Environmental Accounts: 187 Case Studies from Eastern and Southern Africa, ed. R.M. Hassan and E.D. Mungatana, Series Eco-Efficiency in Industry and Science 28.doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5323-5_7.
23. Martín-López, B., I. Iniesta-Arandia, M. García-Llorente, I. Palomo, I. Casado-Arzuaga, et al. 2012. Uncovering ecosystem service bundles through social preferences. PLoS ONE 7: e38970.
24. Mattsson, L., M. Boman, and G. Ericsson. 2009. Jaktens ekonomiska värden då och nu. Vilt och fisk fakta, Nr2.
25. Neuwirth, E. 2011. RColorBrewer: ColorBrewer palettes. R package version 1.0-5. Retrieved 4 January, 2014, from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=RColorBrewer.
26. Norris, K. 2012. Biodiversity in the context of ecosystem services: The applied need for systems approaches. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 367: 191–199.
27. Oksanen, J. F., G. Blanchet, R. Kindt, P. Legendre, P. R. Minchin, R. B. O’Hara, G. L. Simpson, P. Solymos, et al. 2013. vegan: Community Ecology Package. R package version 2.0-9. Retrieved 4 January 4, 2014, from http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=vegan.
28. Pasari, J.R., T. Levi, E.S. Zavaleta, and D. Tilman. 2013. Several scales of biodiversity affect ecosystem multifunctionality. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 10219–10222.
29. Plieninger, T., S. Dijks, E. Oteros-Rozas, and C. Bieling. 2013. Assessing, mapping, and quantifying cultural ecosystem services at community level. Land Use Policy 33: 118–129.
30. Qiu, J., and M.G. Turner. 2013. Spatial interactions among ecosystem services in an urbanizing agricultural watershed. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 110: 12149–12154.
31. R Core Team. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Retrieved 4 January, 2014, from http://www.R-project.org/.
32. Raudsepp-Hearne, C., G.D. Peterson, and E.M. Bennett. 2010. Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 107: 5242–5247.
33. Reyers, B., R. Biggs, G.S. Cumming, T. Elmqvist, A.P. Hejnowicz, and S. Polasky. 2013. Getting the measure of ecosystem services: A social–ecological approach. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 11: 268–273.
34. Rodríguez, J., T. Beard, E. Bennett, G. Cumming, S. Cork, J. Agard, A. Dobson, and G. Peterson. 2006. Trade-offs across space, time, and ecosystem services. Ecology and Society 11: 28.
35. Sporrong, U. 2008. The Stockholm-Mälaren Region. National Atlas of Sweden, 1st edn, 224 pp. Italy: SNA Editors.
36. Tallis, H., and S. Polasky. 2011. Assessing multiple ecosystem services: An integrated tool for the real world. In Natural capital: Theory and practice of mapping ecosystem services, ed. P. Karvera, H. Tallis, T.H. Ricketts, G.C. Daily, and S. Polasky, 34–52. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37. TEEB. 2010. The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity: Mainstreaming the Economics of Nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB.
38. Turner, R.K., and G.C. Daily. 2008. The ecosystem services framework and natural capital conservation. Environmental & Resource Economics 39: 25–35.
39. Turner, K.G., M.V. Odgaard, P.K. Bocher, T. Dalgaard, and J.-C. Svenning. 2014. Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: Trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape and Urban Planning 125: 89–104.
40. Wang, S., and B. Fu. 2013. Trade-offs between forest ecosystem services. Forest Policy and Economics 26: 145–146.