An autonomic resource provisioning approach for service-based cloud applications: A hybrid approach

Future Generation Computer Systems

Volumn 78, Issue , 2018, Pages 191-210

  Ghobaei Arani, Mostafa ^a   Jabbehdari, Sam ^b   Pourmina, Mohammad Ali ^a  

^a ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Autonomic computing; Cloud computing; Cloud services; Reinforcement learning; Resource provisioning

Indexed keywords

CLOUD COMPUTING; DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS; WEB SERVICES;

AUTONOMIC COMPUTING; CLOUD APPLICATIONS; CLOUD COMPUTING ENVIRONMENTS; CLOUD SERVICES; HYBRID APPROACH; RESOURCE PROVISIONING; RESOURCE UTILIZATIONS; SERVICE-BASED;

REINFORCEMENT LEARNING;

EID: 85014054269     PISSN: 0167739X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2017.02.022     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Buyya, R., Vecchiola, C., Selvi, S.T., Mastering Cloud Computing: Foundations and Applications Programming. 2013, Newnes.
2. Chandrasekaran, K., Essentials of Cloud Computing. 2014, CRC Press.
3. Manvi, S.S., Shyam, G.K., Resource management for Infrastructure as a Service (IaaS) in cloud computing: A survey. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 41 (2014), 424–440.
4. Mustafa, S., Nazir, B., Hayat, A., Madani, S.A., Resource management in cloud computing: Taxonomy, prospects, and challenges. Comput. Electr. Eng., 2015.
5. Papazoglou, M.P., Van Den Heuvel, W.J., Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues. VLDB J. 16:3 (2007), 389–415.
6. Rodríguez, S., Tapia, D.I., Sanz, E., Zato, C., de la Prieta, F., Gil, O., Cloud computing integrated into service-oriented multi-agent architecture. Balanced Automation Systems for Future Manufacturing Networks, 2010, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 251-–259.
7. Piprani, B., Sheppard, D., Barbir, A., Comparative analysis of SOA and cloud computing architectures using fact based modeling. On the Move to Meaningful Internet Systems: OTM 2013 Workshops, 2013, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 524–533.
8. Varia, J., Architecting applications for the Amazon cloud. Cloud Computing: Principles and Paradigms, 2011, Wiley Press, New York, USA, 249–274.
9. N.R. Herbst, S. Kounev, R. Reussner, Elasticity in cloud computing: What it is, and what it is not, in: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomic Computing, ICAC 2013, San Jose, CA, 2013.
10. Coutinho, E.F., de Carvalho Sousa, F.R., Rego, P.A.L., Gomes, D.G., de Souza, J.N., Elasticity in cloud computing: a survey. Ann. Telecommun.—Ann. Télécommun., 2015, 1–21.
11. Lorido-Botran, T., Miguel-Alonso, J., Lozano, J.A., A review of auto- scaling techniques for elastic applications in cloud environments. J. Grid Comput. 12:4 (2014), 559–592.
12. Armbrust, M., Fox, A., Griffith, R., Joseph, A.D., Katz, R., Konwinski, A., Lee, G., Patterson, D., Rabkin, A., Stoica, I., Zaharia, M., A view of cloud computing. Commun. ACM 53:4 (2010), 50–58.
13. Singh, S., Chana, I., Q-aware: Quality of service based cloud resource provisioning. Comput. Electr. Eng. 47 (2015), 138–160.
14. Jacob, B., Lanyon-Hogg, R., Nadgir, D.K., Yassin, A.F., A Practical Guide to the IBM Autonomic Computing Toolkit. 2004, IBM Redbooks.
15. Maurer, M., Breskovic, I., Emeakaroha, V.C., Brandic, I., Revealing the MAPE loop for the autonomic management of Cloud infrastructures. 2011 IEEE Symposium on Computers and Communications, (ISCC), 2011, IEEE, 147–152.
16. Russel, S., Norvig, P., Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 2003, EUA: Prentice Hall.
17. Kaelbling, L.P., Littman, M.L., Moore, A.W., Reinforcement learning: A survey. J. Artificial Intelligence Res., 1996, 237–285.
18. Rajavel, R., Thangarathanam, M., Adaptive Probabilistic Behavioural Learning System for the effective behavioural decision in cloud trading negotiation market. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 58 (2016), 29–41.
19. Huebscher, M.C., McCann, J.A., A survey of autonomic computing— degrees, models, and applications. ACM Comput. Surv. (CSUR), 40(3), 2008, 7.
20. Ritter, T., Mitschang, B., Mega, C., Dynamic provisioning of system topologies in the cloud. Enterprise Interoperability V, 2012, Springer, London, 391–401.
21. Pop, F., Potop-Butucaru, M., ARMCO: Advanced topics in resource management for ubiquitous cloud computing: An adaptive approach. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 54 (2016), 79–81.
22. Maurer, M., Brandic, I., Sakellariou, R., Adaptive resource configuration for Cloud infrastructure management. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 29:2 (2013), 472–487.
23. Koehler, M., An adaptive framework for utility-based optimization of scientific applications in the cloud. J. Cloud Comput. 3:1 (2014), 1–12.
24. Emeakaroha, V.C., Brandic, I., Maurer, M., Dustdar, S., Cloud resource provisioning and SLA enforcement via LoM2HiS framework. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper. 25:10 (2013), 1462–1481.
25. Foundation of Self-governing ICT Infrastructures (FoSII), Available http://www.infosys.tuwien.ac.at/linksites/FOSII/index.htm.
26. Al-Ayyoub, M., Jararweh, Y., Daraghmeh, M., Althebyan, Q., Multi- agent based dynamic resource provisioning and monitoring for cloud computing systems infrastructure. Cluster Comput. 18:2 (2015), 919–932.
27. Casalicchio, E., Silvestri, L., Mechanisms for SLA provisioning in cloud-based service providers. Comput. Netw. 57:3 (2013), 795–810.
28. Bahrpeyma, F., Haghighi, H., Zakerolhosseini, A., An adaptive RL based approach for dynamic resource provisioning in Cloud virtualized data centers. Computing, 2015, 1–26.
29. Islam, S., Keung, J., Lee, K., Liu, A., Empirical prediction models for adaptive 0020resource provisioning in the cloud. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 28:1 (2012), 155–162.
30. Barrett, E., Howley, E., Duggan, J., Applying reinforcement learning towards automating resource allocation and application scalability in the cloud. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper. 25:12 (2013), 1656–1674.
31. Liu, J., Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Zhang, D., Liu, H., Aggressive resource provisioning for ensuring QoS in virtualized environments. IEEE Trans. Cloud Comput. 3:2 (2015), 119–131.
32. Qavami, H.R., Jamali, S., Akbari, M.K., Javadi, B., Dynamic resource provisioning in cloud computing: A Heuristic Markovian approach. Cloud Computing, 2014, Springer International Publishing, 102–111.
33. Muppala, S., Chen, G., Zhou, X., Multi-tier service differentiation by coordinated learning-based resource provisioning and admission control. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 74:5 (2014), 2351–2364.
34. Roy, N., Dubey, A., Gokhale, A., Efficient auto-scaling in the cloud using predictive models for workload forecasting. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Cloud Computing, (CLOUD), 2011, IEEE, 500–507.
35. Misra, S., Krishna, P.V., Kalaiselvan, K., Saritha, V., Obaidat, M.S., Learning automata-based QoS framework for cloud IaaS. IEEE Trans. Netw. Serv. Manage. 11:1 (2014), 15–24.
36. Xu, C.Z., Rao, J., Bu, X., URL: A unified reinforcement learning approach for autonomic cloud management. J. Parallel Distrib. Comput. 72:2 (2012), 95–105.
37. Yang, J., Liu, C., Shang, Y., Cheng, B., Mao, Z., Liu, C., Niu, L., Chen, J., A cost-aware auto-scaling approach using the workload prediction in service clouds. Inf. Syst. Front. 16:1 (2014), 7–18.
38. Kephart, J.O., Chess, D.M., The vision of autonomic computing. Computer 36:1 (2003), 41–50.
39. Verma, M., Gangadharan, G.R., Narendra, N.C., Vadlamani, R., Inamdar, V., Ramachandran, L., Calheiros, R.N., Buyya, R., Dynamic resource demand prediction and allocation in multi-tenant service clouds. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper., 2016.
40. Li, W., Delicato, F.C., Pires, P.F., Zomaya, A.Y., Energy-efficient task allocation with quality of service provisioning for concurrent applications in multi-functional wireless sensor network systems. Concurr. Comput.: Pract. Exper. 26:11 (2014), 1869–1888.
41. Yau, K.L.A., Komisarczuk, P., Teal, P.D., Reinforcement learning for context awareness and intelligence in wireless networks: review, new features and open issues. J. Netw. Comput. Appl. 35:1 (2012), 253–267.
42. Verstaevel, N., Régis, C., Gleizes, M.P., Robert, F., Principles and experimentations of self-organizing embedded agents allowing learning from demonstration in ambient robotics. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2016.
43. Wu, J., Xu, X., Zhang, P., Liu, C., A novel multi-agent reinforcement learning approach for job scheduling in Grid computing. Future Gener. Comput. Syst. 27:5 (2011), 430–439.
44. Kober, J., Peters, J., Reinforcement learning in robotics: A survey. Reinforcement Learning, 2012, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 579–610.
45. Cho, S., Fong, S., Park, Y.W., Cho, K., Simulation framework of ubiquitous network environments for designing diverse network robots. Future Gener. Comput. Syst., 2016.
46. Calheiros, R.N., Ranjan, R., BelogRLzov, A., De Rose, C.A., Buyya, R., CloudSim: a toolkit for modeling and simulation of cloud computing environments and evaluation of resource provisioning algorithms. Softw. - Pract. Exp. 41:1 (2011), 23–50.
47. Clarknet-http-two weeks of http logs from the clarknet www server. http://ita.ee.lbl.gov/html/contrib/ClarkNet-HTTP.html (Accessed 15.10.14).
48. Nasa-http- two months of http logs from the kscnasa www server. http://ita.ee.lbl.gov/html/contrib/NASA-HTTP.html (Accessed 15.10.14).
49. Bikas, M.A.N., Alourani, A., Grechanik, M., How elasticity property plays an important role in the cloud: A survey. Adv. Comput., 2016.
50. Rightscale. set up autoscaling using voting tags. https://support.rightscale.com/ (Accessed 01.10.14).