Breast cancer risk and Mammographic Density assessed with semiautomated and Fully automated Methods and Bi-raDs

Radiology

Volumn 282, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 348-355

  Jeffers, Abra M ^a   Sieh, Weiva ^a   Lipson, Jaf A ^b   Rothstein, Joseph H ^a   McGuire, Valerie ^a   Whittemore, Alice S ^a   Rubin, Daniel L ^b  

^a Department of Management Science and Engineering ^*  (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; CANCER CLASSIFICATION; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SOFTWARE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY SYSTEM; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; AGED; BODY MASS; BREAST TUMOR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE; TUMOR INVASION;

ADULT; AGED; BODY MASS INDEX; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOFTWARE;

EID: 85013684249     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152062     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Li T, Sun L, Miller N, et al. The association of measured breast tissue characteristics with mammographic density and other risk factors for breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2005;14(2):343-349.
2. Johns PC, Yaffe MJ. X-ray characterisation of normal and neoplastic breast tissues. Phys Med Biol 1987;32(6):675-695.
3. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Bronskill M, Yaffe MJ, Duric N, Minkin S. Breast tissue composi-tion and susceptibility to breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2010;102(16):1224-1237.
4. Vachon CM, van Gils CH, Sellers TA, et al. Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction. Breast Cancer Res 2007;9(6):217.
5. Pettersson A, Graff RE, Ursin G, et al. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106(5):dju078.
6. Pisano ED, Zuley M, Baum JK, Marques HS. Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography. Radiol Clin North Am 2007;45(5):813-830, vi.
7. Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M, Bovbjerg VE, Petroni GR, Harvey JA. Accu-racy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category defnitions. Acad Radiol 2006;13(9): 1143-1149.
8. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Yaffe MJ, Minkin S. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects. Breast Cancer Res 2011;13(6):223.
9. Byng J W, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammo-graphic densities. Phys Med Biol 1994;39(10): 1629-1638.
10. Eng A, Gallant Z, Shepherd J, et al. Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res 2014;16(5):439.
11. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analy-sis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006; 15(6):1159-1169.
12. Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res 2008;10(3):209.
13. Fowler EE, Vachon CM, Scott CG, Sellers TA, Heine JJ. Automated percentage of breast density measurements for full-feld digital mammography applications. Acad Radiol 2014;21(8):958-970.
14. Brandt KR, Scott CG, Ma L, et al. Comparison of clinical and automated breast density measurements: implications for risk prediction and supplemental screening. Radiology 2016;279(3):710-719.
15. Habel LA, Lipson JA, Achacoso N, et al. Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms. Breast Cancer Res 2016;18(1):53.
16. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE. Digital image pro-cessing. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2008.
17. Boyd NF, Rommens JM, Vogt K, et al. Mam-mographic breast density as an interme-diate phenotype for breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2005;6(10):798-808.
18. Keller BM, Nathan DL, Gavenonis SC, Chen J, Conant EF, Kontos D. Reader variability in breast density estimation from full-feld digital mammograms: the effect of image postprocessing on relative and absolute measures. Acad Radiol 2013;20(5): 560-568.
19. Draper N, Smith H. Applied regression analysis. 2nd ed. New York, NY: Wiley, 1976.
20. Berglund P, Heeringa S. SAS Institute. Multiple imputation of missing data using SAS. Cary, NC: SAS Institute, 2014.
21. DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988;44(3):837-845.
22. Li J, Szekely L, Eriksson L, et al. High-throughput mammographic-density measurement: a tool for risk prediction of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14(4): R114.
23. Sovio U, Li J, Aitken Z, et al. Comparison of fully and semi-automated area-based methods for measuring mammographic density and predicting breast cancer risk. Br J Cancer 2014;110(7):1908-1916.
24. Darabi H, Czene K, Zhao W, Liu J, Hall P, Humphreys K. Breast cancer risk prediction and individualised screening based on common genetic variation and breast density measurement. Breast Cancer Res 2012;14(1):R25.
25. Vickers AJ, Cronin AM, Begg CB. One statistical test is suffcient for assessing new predictive markers. BMC Med Res Meth-odol 2011;11:13.