Case-control study of mammographic density and breast cancer risk using processed digital mammograms

Breast Cancer Research

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Habel, Laurel A ^a,b   Lipson, Jafi A ^b   Achacoso, Ninah ^a   Rothstein, Joseph H ^b   Yaffe, Martin J ^c,d   Liang, Rhea Y ^b   Acton, Luana ^a   McGuire, Valerie ^b   Whittemore, Alice S ^b   Rubin, Daniel L ^b   Sieh, Weiva ^b  

^a DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (Canada)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Epidemiology; Mammographic density; Mammography; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIGITAL MAMMOGRAPHY; FAMILY HISTORY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MENOPAUSE; MIDDLE AGED; PARITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; CANCER REGISTRY; CAUCASIAN; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; MAMMOGRAPHY; ODDS RATIO; PATHOLOGY; RISK; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; ODDS RATIO; RISK; SEER PROGRAM;

EID: 84969513603     PISSN: 14655411     EISSN: 1465542X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13058-016-0715-3     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, Sun L, Stone J, Fishell E, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:227-36.
2. McCormack VA, dos Santos Silva I. Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006;15:1159-69.
3. Pettersson A, Graff RE, Ursin G, Santos Silva ID, McCormack V, Baglietto L, et al. Mammographic density phenotypes and risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(5):dju078.
4. Pisano ED, Zuley M, Baum JK, Marques HS. Issues to consider in converting to digital mammography. Radiol Clin North Am. 2007;45:813-30.
5. Whitman JG, Haygood TM, editors. Digital mammography: a practical approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2012.
6. Vachon CM, Fowler EE, Tiffenberg G, Scott CG, Pankratz VS, Sellers TA, et al. Comparison of percent density from raw and processed full-field digital mammography data. Breast Cancer Res. 2013;15:R1.
7. Fowler EE, Vachon CM, Scott CG, Sellers TA, Heine JJ. Automated percentage of breast density measurements for full-field digital mammography applications. Acad Radiol. 2014;21:958-70.
8. Boyd NF, Dite GS, Stone J, Gunasekara A, English DR, McCredie MR, et al. Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;347:886-94.
9. Byng JW, Boyd NF, Fishell E, Jong RA, Yaffe MJ. The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities. Phys Med Biol. 1994;39:1629-38.
10. Gonzalez RC, Woods RE, eds. Digital image processing. Upper Saddle River: Pearson/Prentice Hall; 2008.
11. Pisano ED, Hendrick RE, Yaffe MJ, Baum JK, Acharyya S, Cormack JB, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of digital versus film mammography: exploratory analysis of selected population subgroups in DMIST. Radiology. 2008;246:376-83.
12. Pisano ED, Cole EB, Hemminger BM, Yaffe MJ, Aylward SR, Maidment AD, et al. Image processing algorithms for digital mammography: a pictorial essay. Radiographics. 2000;20:1479-91.
13. Yaffe MJ. Mammographic density. Measurement of mammographic density. Breast Cancer Res. 2008;10:209.
14. Nagata C, Matsubara T, Fujita H, Nagao Y, Shibuya C, Kashiki Y, et al. Mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women. Br J Cancer. 2005;92:2102-6.
15. Eng A, Gallant Z, Shepherd J, McCormack V, Li J, Dowsett M, et al. Digital mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a case-control study of six alternative density assessment methods. Breast Cancer Res. 2014;16(5):439.