Analyze me: Open learner model in an adaptive web testing system

International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 255-271

  Lazarinis, Fotis ^a   Retalis, Symeon ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PIRAEUS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Adaptive hypermedia testing system; Interoperability; Learning standards; User modelling

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013602636     PISSN: 15604292     EISSN: 15604306     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Angelo, T. A., & Cross, K. P. (1993). Classroom Assessment Techniques: A Handbook for College Teachers (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Arroyo, I., Conejo, R., Guzmand, E., & Woolf, B.P. (2001). An Adaptive Web-Based Component for Cognitive Ability Estimation. In J. D. Moore, C. L. Redfield & W. L. Johnson (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: AI-ED in the Wired and Wireless World (pp. 456-466). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
3. Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (1998). Assessment and Classroom Learning. Assessment in Education, 5(1), 7-74.
4. Brusilovsky, P. (2001). Adaptive hypermedia. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 11, 87-110.
5. Brusilovsky, P., Sosnovsky, S., & Shcherbinina, O. (2004). QuizGuide: Increasing the Educational Value of Individualized Self-Assessment Quizzes with Adaptive Navigation Support. In J. Nall & R. Robson (Eds.)Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning (pp. 1806-1813). Washington, DC: AACE.
6. Bull, S. (2004). Supporting Learning with Open Learner Models. Proceedings of 4th Hellenic Conference with International Participation: Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Athens, Greece. (Keynote).
7. Bull, S., & McEvoy, A. T. (2003). An Intelligent Learning Environment with an Open Learner Model for the Desktop PC and Pocket PC. In U. Hoppe, F. Verdejo & J. Kay (Eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education: Shaping the Future of Learning through Intelligent Technologies (pp. 389-391). Amsterdam: IOS Press.
8. Bull, S., & McKay, M. (2004). An Open Learner Model for Children and Teachers: Inspecting Knowledge Level of Individuals and Peers. In J. C. Lester, R. M. Vicari & F. Paraguaçu (Eds.) Intelligent Tutoring Systems: 7th International Conference (pp. 646-655). Berlin-Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
9. Bull, S., & Nghiem, T. (2002). Helping Learners to Understand Themselves with a Learner Model Open to Students, Peers and Instructors. In P. Brna & V. Dimitrova (Eds). Proceedings of Workshop on Individual and Group Modelling Methods that Help Learners Understand Themselves (pp. 5-13). International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems, San Sebastian, Spain.
10. Collins, J. A., Greer, J. E., & Huang, S. X. (1996). Adaptive assessment using granularity hierarchies and bayesian nets. In C. Frasson, G. Gauthier & A. Lesgold (Eds.) Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 569-577). New York: Springer Verlag.
11. Conejo, R., Guzmán, E., Millán, E., Trella, M., Pérez-de-la-Cruz, J. L., & Ríos, A. (2004). SIETTE: A Web Based Tool for Adaptive Teaching. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 29-61.
12. De Bra P., Arroyo, L., & Cristea A. (2004). Adaptive Web-Based Educational Hypermedia. Web Dynamics, 387-410.
13. Dimitrova, V., (2003). STyLE-OLM: Interactive Open Learner Modelling. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 13, 35-78.
14. Dimitrova, V., Self, J., & Brna, P. (2000). Involving the Learner in Diagnosis-Potentials and Problems. Tutorial at Web Information Technologies: Research, Education and Commerce, Montpellier, France.
15. Dolog, P., Gavriloaie, R., Nejdl, W., & Brase, J. (2003). Integrating adaptive hypermedia techniques and open rdf-based environments. In Proceedings of 12th International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
16. Guzmán, E., & Conejo, R. (2002). An adaptive assessment tool integrable into Internet-based learning systems. International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Education, Badajoz, Spain.
17. Hambleton, R. K., Swamination, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of Item Response Theory. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
18. Hansen, C., & McCalla, G. (2003). Active Open Learner Modelling. In S. Bull, P. Brna & V. Dimitrova (Eds.) Proceedings of Workshop on Learner Modelling for Reflection (pp. 248-257). International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Sydney, Australia.
19. IEEE PAPI (2002). PAPI Learner. Retrieved October 5, 2005 from http://edutool.com/papi/
20. IEEE/ACM Computing Curricula, (2001). CS Body of Knowledge. Retrieved October 5, 2005 from http://www.computer.org/education/cc2001/final/appa.htm
21. IMS QTI (2005). Question and Test Interoperability Specification. Retrieved October 5, 2005 http://www.imsglobal.org/question/
22. IMS LIP (2005). IMS Learner Information Package Specification. Retrieved October 5, 2005 from http://www.imsglobal.org/profiles/
23. Jensen, M.R., & Feuerstein, R. (1987). The learning potential assessment device: From philosophy to practice. In C.S. Lidz (Ed.) Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 379-402). New York: Guilford Publications.
24. Kay, J. (1997). Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to Give Learner Control and Responsibility. In Z. Halim, T. Ottomann & Z. Razak (Eds.) Proceedings of International Conference on Computers in Education (pp.17-24). Charlottesville, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
25. Martinez, M.E., & Lipon, J.I. (1989). Assessment for learning. Educational Leadership, 46(7), 73-75.
26. Mitrovic, A., & Martin, B. (2002). Evaluating the Effects of Open Student Models on Learning. In P. De Bra, P. Brusilovsky & R. Conejo (Eds.) Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, Proceedings of Second International Conference (pp. 296-305). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.
27. Mühlenbrock, M., Tewissen, F., & Hoppe, H.U. (1998). A Framework System for Intelligent Support in Open Distributed Learning Environments. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 9(3-4), 256-274.
28. Pitkow, J., & Recker, M. (1995). Using the Web as a Survey Tool: Results from the Second WWW User Survey. Computer Networks ISDN Systems, 27(6), 809-822.
29. Romero, C., Martin-Palomo, S., De Bra, P., & Ventura, S. (2004). An Authoring Tool for Web-Based Adaptive and Classic Tests. Proceedings of the AACE ELearn’2004 Conference (pp. 174-177).
30. Self, J. A. (1990). Bypassing the intractable problem of student modelling. In C. Frasson & G. Gauthier (Eds.) Intelligent tutoring systems: At the crossroad of artificial intelligence and education. Norwood, New Jersey: Ablex Publishing Corporation.
31. van der Linden, W. J., & Glas, C. A. W. (2000). Computerized Adaptive Testing: Theory and Practice. Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
32. Zapata-Rivera, J-D., & Greer, J.E. (2001). Externalising Learner Modelling Representations. In Proceedings of Workshop on External Representations of AIED: Multiple Forms and Multiple Roles (pp. 71-76). 10th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, San Antonio, Texas.