An open learner model for children and teachers: Inspecting knowledge level of individuals and peers

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3220, Issue , 2004, Pages 646-655

  Bull, Susan ^a   McKay, Mark ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER AIDED INSTRUCTION; EDUCATION; EDUCATION COMPUTING; INTELLIGENT VEHICLE HIGHWAY SYSTEMS; TEACHING;

ADULT LEARNERS; INTELLIGENT TUTORING SYSTEM; KNOWLEDGE LEVEL; LEARNER MODEL; LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS; LEVEL OF INTEREST; OPEN LEARNER MODELING; OPEN LEARNER MODELS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 35048829812     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30139-4_61     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Bull, S. & Pain, H. (1995). 'Did I say what I think I said, and do you agree with me?': Inspecting and Questioning the Student Model, Proceedings of World Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE), Charlottesville, VA, 1995, 501-508.
2. Dimitrova, V., Self, J. & Brna, P. (2001). Applying Interactive Open Learner Models to Learning Technical Terminology, User Modeling 2001: 8th International Conference, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 148-157.
3. Mitrovic, A. & Martin, B. (2002). Evaluating the Effects of Open Student Models on Learning, Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, Proceedings of Second International Conference, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg, 296-305.
4. th International Conference, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 442-452.
5. Barnard, Y.F. & Sandberg, J.A.C. (1996). Self-Explanations, do we get them from our students?, Proceedings of European Conference on AI in Education, Lisbon, 115-121.
6. Bull, S. & Nghiem, T. (2002). Helping Learners to Understand Themselves with a Learner Model Open to Students, Peers and Instructors, Proceedings of Workshop on Individual and Group Modelling Methods that Help Learners Understand Themselves, International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems 2002, 5-13.
7. Zapata-Rivera, J-D. & Greer, J.E. (2001). Externalising Learner Modelling Representations, Proceedings of Workshop on External Representations of AIED: Multiple Forms and Multiple Roles, International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education 2001, 71-76.
8. Kay, J. (1997). Learner Know Thyself: Student Models to Give Learner Control and Responsibility, Proceedings of ICCE, AACE, 17-24.
9. Linton, F. & Schaefer, H-P. (2000). Recommender Systems for Learning: Building User and Expert Models through Long-Term Observation of Application Use, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10, 181-207.
10. Bull, S. & Broady, E. (1997). Spontaneous Peer Tutoring from Sharing Student Models, Artificial Intelligence in Education, IOS Press, Amsterdam, 143-150.
11. Brown, J.S. & Burton, R.R. (1978). Diagnostic Models for Procedural Bugs in Basic Mathematical Skills, Cognitive Science 2, 155-192.
12. Burton, R.R. (1982). Diagnosing Bugs in a Simple Procedural Skill, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, Academic Press, 157-183.
13. Department for Education and Skills (2004). The Standards Site: The National Numeracy Strategy, http://www.standards.dfes.gov.uk/numeracy.