The Transparent and the Invisible in Professional Pedagogical Vision for Science Teaching

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 116, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 95-103

  McDonald, Scott P ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

inquiry teaching; preservice teacher education; professional vision

Indexed keywords

EID: 85013426503     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/ssm.12156     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bryan, L. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: Examining a prospective elementary teacher's belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(9), 835–868. doi:10.1002/tea.10113
2. Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Students' questions and discursive interaction: Their impact on argumentation during collaborative group discussions in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(7), 883–908. doi:10.1002/tea.20385
3. Crawford, B. A. (2007). Learning to teach science as inquiry in the rough and tumble of practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(4), 613–642. doi:10.1002/tea
4. Davis, E. A., Petish, D., & Smithey, J. (2006). Challenges new science teachers face. Review of Educational Research, 76(4), 607–651.
5. Davis, K. S. (2003). “Change is hard”: What science teachers are telling us about reform and teacher learning of innovative practices. Science Education, 87, 3–30.
6. Elmore, R. F. (2000). Building new structure for school leadership. Cambridge, MA: The Albert Shanker Institute.
7. Goodwin, C. (1994). Professional vision. American Anthropologist, 96(3), 606–633.
8. Grandy, R., & Duschl, R. A. (2007). Reconsidering the character and role of inquiry in school science: Analysis of a conference. Science Education, 16, 141–166.
9. Grossman, P. L. (1991). Overcoming the apprenticeship of observation in teacher education coursework. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(4), 345–357.
10. Gutiérrez, K. D., & Rogoff, B. (2003). Cultural ways of learning: Individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educational Researcher, 32(5), 19–25.
11. Hammerness, K., Darling-Hammond, L., Bransford, J., Berliner, D., Cochran-Smith, M., McDonald, M., & Zeichner, K. M. (2005). How teachers learn and develop. In L. Darling-Hammond & J. Bransford (Eds.), Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do (1st ed., pp. 358–389). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
12. Lampert, M. (2009). Learning teaching in, from, and for practice: What do we mean? Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1–2), 21–34. doi:10.1177/0022487109347321
13. Lampert, M., & Ball, D. L. (1998). Teaching, multimedia, and mathematics: investigations of real practice. The practitioner inquiry series. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
14. Lobato, J., Hohensee, C., & Rhodehamel, B. (2014). Students' mathematical noticing. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(5), 809–850.
15. Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Luehmann, A. L., & Markowitz, D. (2007). Science teachers' perceived benefits of an out-of school enrichment programme: Identity needs and university affordances. International Journal of Science Education, 29(9), 1133–1161.
17. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (2002). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: The construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Netherlands: Springer. doi:10.1007/0-306-47217-1
18. McDonald, S. P. (2010). Building a conversation: Preservice teachers’ use of video as data for making evidence-based arguments about practice. Educational Technology, 50(1), 28–31.
19. McDonald, S., & Kelly, G. J. (2007). Understanding the construction of a science storyline in a chemistry classroom. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 2(3), 165–177. doi:10.1080/15544800701366563
20. McDonald, S. P., & Songer, N. B. (2008). Enacting classroom inquiry: Theorizing teachers’ conceptions of science teaching. Science Education, 92(6), 971–993.
21. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
22. National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (1999). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). http://nces.ed.gov/timss/
23. National Research Council. (2000). Inquiry and the national science education standards: A guide for teaching and learning. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
24. National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
25. Roth, K., & Garnier, H. (2006). What science teaching looks like: An international perspective. Educational Leadership, 64(4), 16–23.
26. Seidel, T., Stürmer, K., Blomberg, G., Kobarg, M., & Schwindt, K. (2011). Teacher learning from analysis of videotaped classroom situations: Does it make a difference whether teachers observe their own teaching or that of others? Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 259–267. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2010.08.009
27. Shepherd, C. E., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008). Examining preservice teacher inquiry through video-based, formative assessment e-portfolios. Journal of Computing in Teacher Education, 25(1), 31–37.
28. Sherin, M. G., & van Es, E. A. (2005). Using video to support teachers' ability to notice classroom interactions. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(3), 475–491.
29. Tsai, C. C. (2010). Nested epistemologies: Science teachers' beliefs of teaching, learning and science. International Journal of Science Education, 24(8), 771–783. doi:10.1080/0950069011004913
30. van Es, E. A., & Sherin, M. G. (2008). Mathematics teachers' “learning to notice” in the context of a video club. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(2), 244–276.
31. Wickman, P. (2002). Learning as discourse change: A sociocultural mechanism. Science Education, 86, 601–623. doi:10.1002/sce.10036
32. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903. doi:10.1002/sce.21027
33. Yerrick, R., Ross, D., & Molebash, P. (2005). Too close for comfort: Real-time science teaching reflections via digital video editing. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 16(4), 351–375.
34. Zembal-Saul, C. (2009). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93(4), 687–719.