Forensic Visualization: Survey and Future Research Directions

Contemporary Digital Forensic Investigations of Cloud and Mobile Applications

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 163-184

  Tassone, C ^a   Martini, B ^a   Choo, Kim Kwang Raymond ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT SAN ANTONIO   (United States)

Author keywords

Digital forensic; Forensic visualization; Human interpretation; Visualization methodology

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER CRIME; DIGITAL DEVICES; ELECTRONIC CRIME COUNTERMEASURES; SURVEYS; VISUALIZATION;

COURT CASE; DYNAMIC ENVIRONMENTS; FORENSIC APPLICATIONS; FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS; HUMAN INTERPRETATION; NEW FORMS; PORTABLE ELECTRONIC DEVICES; VISUALIZATION METHODOLOGIES;

DIGITAL FORENSICS;

EID: 85013175478     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-805303-4.00011-3     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Lim N., Khoo A. Forensics of computers and handheld devices identical or fraternal twins?. Commun. ACM 2009, 52(6):132-135.
2. Quick D., Choo K.-K.R. Digital droplets: Microsoft Skydrive forensic data remnants. Futur. Gener. Comput. Syst. 2013, 29(6):1378-1394.
3. Quick D., Choo K.-K.R. Dropbox analysis: data remnants on user machines. Digit. Investig. 2013, 10(1):3-18.
4. Australian Communications and Media Authority Communications Report 2014-15 2015, Australian Communications and Media Authority, Australia.
5. Smith A. Smartphone Ownership-2013 Update 2013, Pew Research Center's Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC.
6. Behavioural Insights Team Reducing Mobile Phone Theft and Improving Security 2014, Behavioural Insights Team, London.
7. Rotberg R.I., Aker J.C. Mobile phones: uplifting weak and failed states. Wash. Q. 2013, 36(1):111-125.
8. Choo K.-K.R. Harnessing information and communications technologies in community policing. Research and Public Policy Series 111 2011, 67-75. Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra.
9. Mckemmish R. What is Forensic Computing? 1999, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, Australian Institute of Criminology Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice.
10. Quick D., Choo K.-K.R. Impacts of increasing volume of digital forensic data: a survey and future research challenges. Digit. Investig. 2014, 11(4):273-294.
11. Baryamureeba V., Tushabe F. The enhanced digital investigation process model 2004.
12. Reith M., Carr C., Gunsch G. An examination of digital forensic models. Int. J. Digit. Evid. 2002, 1(3):1-12.
13. Selamat S.R., Yusof R., Sahib S. Mapping process of digital forensic investigation framework. Int. J. Comput. Netw. Secur. 2008, 8(10):163-169.
14. Beebe N.L., Clark J.G. A hierarchical, objectives-based framework for the digital investigations process. Digit. Investig. 2005, 2(2):147-167.
15. Grispos G., Storer T., Glisson W.B. A comparison of forensic evidence recovery techniques for a windows mobile smart phone. Digit. Investig. 2011, 8(1):23-36.
16. Breeuwsma M., de Jongh M., Klaver C., Van Der Knijff R., Roeloffs M. Forensic data recovery from flash memory. Small Scale Digit. Device Forensics J. 2007, 1(1):1-17.
17. Kessler G.C. Anti-Forensics and the Digital Investigator 2007, Edith Cowan University, Mount Lawley, WA, p. 1.
18. Jansen W., Delaitre A., Moenner L. Overcoming impediments to cell phone forensics 2008, 483.
19. Garfinkel S.L. Digital forensics research: the next 10 years. Digit. Investig. 2010, 7:S64-S73.
20. Glisson W.B., Storer T., Buchanan-Wollaston J. An empirical comparison of data recovered from mobile forensic toolkits. Digit. Investig. 2013, 10(1):44-55.
21. Tassone C., Martini B., Choo K.-K.R., Slay J. Mobile Device Forensics: A Snapshot 2013, Australian Institute of Criminology, Canberra, Australian Institute of Criminology Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 460, 1-7.
22. Fairbanks K., Atreya K., Owen H. Blackberry IPD parsing for open source forensics 2009, 195-199.
23. Guo Y.H., Slay J., Beckett J. Validation and verification of computer forensic software tools-searching function. Digit. Investig. 2009, 6:S12-S22.
24. Irwin D., Hunt R. Forensic information acquisition in mobile networks 2009, 163-168.
25. Raghav S., Saxena A.K. Mobile forensics: guidelines and challenges in data preservation and acquisition 2009, 5-8.
26. Eick S.G. Graphically displaying text. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 1994, 3(2):127-142.
27. M. Friendly, D.J. Denis, Milestones in the History of Thematic Cartography, Statistical Graphics, and Data Visualization, Retrieved, 5(11), 2001, p. 2011.
28. Thomas J.J., Cook K.A. Illuminating the Path: The Research and Development Agenda for Visual Analytics 2005, National Visualization and Analytics Center, Richland, WA.
29. Catanese S.A., Fiumara G. A visual tool for forensic analysis of mobile phone traffic 2010, 71-76.
30. Mohay G. Technical challenges and directions for digital forensics 2005, 155-161.
31. Vlastos E., Patel A. An open source forensic tool to visualize digital evidence. Comput. Stand. Interfaces 2008, 30(1-2):8-19.
32. Kim K., Un S.K. Visual analysis of portable computer forensic data. Ubiquitous Information Technologies and Applications 2013, 453-459. Springer, Netherlands. Y.-H. Han, D.-S. Park, W. Jia, S.-S. Yeo (Eds.).
33. Chavhan S., Nirkhi S.M. Visualization techniques for digital forensics: a survey. Int. J. Adv. Comp. Res. 2012, 2(4):74-76.
34. Teelink S., Erbacher R.F. Improving the computer forensic analysis process through visualization. Commun. ACM 2006, 49(2):71-75.
35. Herman I., Melançon G., Marshall M.S. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: a survey. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2000, 6(1):24-43.
36. Schrenk G., Poisel R. A discussion of visualization techniques for the analysis of digital evidence 2011, 758-763.
37. Goodall J.R. Visualization is better! A comparative evaluation 2009, 57-68.
38. Osborne G., Slay J. Digital forensics infovis: an implementation of a process for visualisation of digital evidence 2011.
39. Olsson J., Boldt M. Computer forensic timeline visualization tool. Digit. Investig. 2009, 6:S78-S87.
40. Osborne G., Turnbull B. Enhancing computer forensics investigation through visualization and data exploitation 2009, 1012-1017.
41. Becker J., Heddier M., öKsuz A., Knackstedt R. The effect of providing visualizations in privacy policies on trust in data privacy and security 2014, 3224-3233.
42. Francia G., Trifas M., Brown D., Francia R., Scott C. Visualization and management of digital forensics data 2006, 96-101.
43. Thomson A., Graham M., Kennedy J. Pianola-visualization of multivariate time-series security event data 2013, 123-131.
44. Aigner W., Miksch S., Müller W., Schumann H., Tominski C. Visualizing time-oriented data-a systematic view. Comput. Graph. 2007, 31(3):401-409.
45. Teerlink S., Erbacher F.R. Foundations for visual forensic analysis 2006, 192-199.
46. Osborne G., Turnbull B., Slay J. The Explore, Investigate and Correlate' (Eic) conceptual framework for digital forensics information visualization 2010, 629-634.
47. Osborne G. The Explore, Investigate and Correlate Process for Information Visualization in Digital Forensics 2012, University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA.
48. Wanner F., Stoffel A., Jäckle D., Kwon B., Weiler A., Keim D., Isaacs K.E., Giménez A., Jusufi I., Gamblin T. State-of-the-art report of visual analysis for event detection in text data streams 2014, 1-18.
49. Aigner W., Miksch S., Schumann H., Tominski C. Survey of visualization techniques: visualization of time-oriented data 2011, Springer, London, pp. 147-254.
50. Krstajic M., Keim D.A. Visualization of streaming data: observing change and context in information visualization techniques 2013, 41-47.
51. Caserta P., Zendra O. Visualization of the static aspects of software: a survey. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011, 17(7):913-933.
52. Shamim A., Balakrishnan V., Tahir M. Evaluation of opinion visualization techniques. Inf. Vis. 2014, 10.1177/1473871614550537.
53. Miettinen K. Survey of methods to visualize alternatives in multiple criteria decision making problems. OR Spectr. 2014, 36(1):3-37.
54. Sun G.-D., Wu Y.-C., Liang R.-H., Liu S.-X. A survey of visual analytics techniques and applications: state-of-the-art research and future challenges. J. Comput. Sci. Technol. 2013, 28(5):852-867.
55. Bernardes P., Madeira J., Martins M., Meireles J. The use of traditional and computer-based visualization in archaeology: a user survey 2012.
56. Schulz H., Hadlak S., Schumann H. The design space of implicit hierarchy visualization: a survey. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2011, 17(4):393-411.
57. Pleuss A., Rabiser R., Botterweck G. Visualization techniques for application in interactive product configuration 2011, 1-8.
58. Alencar A.B., De Oliveira M.C.F., Paulovich F.V. Seeing beyond reading: a survey on visual text analytics. WIREs Data Min. Knowl. Discovery 2012, 2(6):476-492.
59. Dias M.M., Franco C., Rabelo E., Yamaguchi J.K. Visualization techniques: which is the most appropriate in the process of knowledge discovery in data base? 2012, InTech Open Access, Croatia.
60. Gan Q., Zhu M., Li M., Liang T., Cao Y., Zhou B. Document visualization: an overview of current research. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Comput. Stat. 2014, 6(1):19-36.
61. Abdelaziz M., Nancy R., Olivier S. Survey of multidimensional visualization techniques 2012.
62. Zhang Y., Xiao Y., Chen M., Zhang J., Deng H. A survey of security visualization for computer network logs. Secur. Commun. Netw. 2012, 5(4):404-421.
63. Shneiderman B., Dunne C., Sharma P., Wang P. Innovation trajectories for information visualizations: comparing treemaps, cone trees, and hyperbolic trees. Inf. Vis. 2012, 11(2):87-105.
64. Geng Z., Laramee R.S., Cheesman T., Rothwell A., Berry D.M., Ehrmann A. Visualizing translation variation of Othello: a survey of text visualization and analysis tools 2011.
65. Rohrdantz C., Krstajic M., El Assady M., Keim D. What's going on? How twitter and online news can work in synergy to increase situational awareness 2012.
66. Javed W., Mcdonnel B., Elmqvist N. Graphical perception of multiple time series. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2010, 16(6):927-934.
67. Perin C., Vernier F., Fekete J.-D. Interactive horizon graphs: improving the compact visualization of multiple time series 2013, 3217-3226.
68. Eun Kyoung C., Bongshin L., Schraefel M.C. Characterizing visualization insights from quantified selfers' personal data presentations. IEEE Comput. Graph. Appl. 2015, 35(4):28-37.
69. Basit H.A., Hammad M., Koschke R. A survey on goal-oriented visualization of clone data 2015, 46-55.
70. Johansson J., Forsell C. Evaluation of parallel coordinates: overview, categorization and guidelines for future research. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016, 22(1):579-588.
71. Mckemmish R. When is digital evidence forensically sound?. Advances in Digital Forensics IV, IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2008, vol. 285:3-15. Springer, New York. http://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007%2F978-0-387-84927-0_1.
72. Carrier B., Spafford E.H. An event-based digital forensic investigation framework 2004.
73. Friendly M., Denis D. The early origins and development of the scatterplot. J. Hist. Behav. Sci. 2005, 41(2):103-130.
74. Inselberg A. The plane with parallel coordinates. Vis. Comput. 1985, 1(2):69-91.
75. Van Long T. A new metric on parallel coordinates and its application for high-dimensional data visualization 2015, 297-301.
76. Havre S., Hetzler B., Nowell L. Themeriver: visualizing theme changes over time. IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2002, 8(1):9-20.
77. Robertson G.G., Mackinlay J.D., Card S.K. Cone trees: animated 3d visualizations of hierarchical information 1991, ACM, New York, pp. 189-194.
78. Borgo R., Kehrer J., Chung D.H., Maguire E., Laramee R.S., Hauser H., Ward M., Chen M. Glyph-based visualization: foundations, design guidelines, techniques and applications 2013, 39-63.
79. Komlodi A., Rheingans P., Ayachit U., Goodall J.R., Joshi A. A user-centered look at glyph-based security visualization 2005, 21-28.
80. Collins C., Carpendale S., Penn G. Docuburst: Visualizing Document Content Using Language Structure 2009, 1039-1046. Wiley Online Library.
81. Heuss T., Humm B., Deuschel T., Fröhlich T., Herth T., Mitesser O. Semantically guided, situation-aware literature research. Series 162, 2015, 66. IFLA, The Hague.