Visualization techniques for application in interactive product configuration

ACM International Conference Proceeding Series

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages

  Pleuss, Andreas ^a   Rabiser, Rick ^b   Botterweck, Goetz ^a  

^a University of Limerick   (Ireland)

^b JOHANNES KEPLER UNIVERSITY LINZ   (Austria)

Author keywords

Product configuration; Product line engineering; Software visualization

Indexed keywords

INTERACTIVE PRODUCTS; INTERACTIVE TECHNIQUES; NON-TRIVIAL; PRODUCT CONFIGURATION; PRODUCT LINE ENGINEERING; PRODUCT-LINES; RESEARCH AGENDA; SOFTWARE VISUALIZATION; VARIABILITY MODEL; VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUE;

ENGINEERING RESEARCH; MODELS; PRODUCTION ENGINEERING; USER INTERFACES;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 80052660724     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/2019136.2019161     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. R. A. Amar and J. T. Stasko. Knowledge precepts for design and evaluation of information visualizations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 11:432-442, 2005. (Pubitemid 41049905)
2. C. Atkinson, J. Bayer, C. Bunse, E. Kamsties, O. Laitenberger, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, B. Paech, J. Wüst, and J. Zettel. Component-Based Product Line Engineering with UML. Addison-Wesley, 2002.
3. T. Barlow and P. Neville. A comparison of 2-d visualizations of hierarchies. In INFOVIS, pages 131-138. IEEE CS, 2001. (Pubitemid 33099036)
4. J. Bayer, O. Flege, P. Knauber, R. Laqua, D. Muthig, K. Schmid, T. Widen, and J.-M. DeBaud. Pulse: a methodology to develop software product lines. In SSR at ICSE 1999, pages 122-131. ACM, 1999.
5. L. Beaudoin, M.-A. Parent, and L. C. Vroomen. Cheops: a compact explorer for complex hierarchies. In Visualization, pages 87-ff. IEEE CS, 1996.
6. D. Benavides, S. Segura, and A. Ruiz-Cortés. Automated analysis of feature models 20 years later. Information Systems, 35(6):615-636, 2010.
7. T. Berger, S. She, R. Lotufo, A. Wasowski, and K. Czarnecki. Variability modeling in the real: A perspective from the operating systems domain. In 25th International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pages 73-82, Antwerp, Belgium, 2010. ACM.
8. S. K. Card, J. D. Mackinlay, and B. Shneiderman. Readings in Information Visualization: Using Vision to Think. Morgan Kaufmann, 1999.
9. K. Czarnecki, S. Helson, and U. Eisenecker. Staged configuration using feature models. In SPLC, pages 266-283. Springer, 2004.
10. S. Deelstra, M. Sinnema, and J. Bosch. Product derivation in software product families: a case study. Journal of Systems and Software, 74(2):173-194, 2005.
11. D. Dhungana, P. Grünbacher, and R. Rabiser. The DOPLER meta-tool for decision-oriented variability modeling: A multiple case study. Automated Software Engineering, 18(1):77-114, 2011.
12. D. Dhungana, P. Grünbacher, R. Rabiser, and T. Neumayer. Structuring the modeling space and supporting evolution in software product line engineering. Journal of Systems and Software, 83(7):1108-1122, 2010.
13. O. Djebbi, C. Salinesi, and G. Fanmuy. Industry survey of product lines management tools: Requirements, qualities and open issues. In RE, pages 301-306. IEEE CS, 2007.
14. ESI Spain and IKV++ Technologies AG Germany. MASTER: Model-driven architecture instrumentation, enhancement and refinement. Technical report, MASTER-2002-D1.1-V1-PUBLIC, 2002.
15. V. Friedman. Data visualization: Modern approaches. Website, 2007. http://www.smashingmagazine.com/2007/08/02/data-visualization-modern-approaches/ .
16. H. Gomaa. Designing Software Product Lines with UML. Addison-Wesley, 2005.
17. I. Herman, G. Melançon, and M. S. Marshall. Graph visualization and navigation in information visualization: A survey. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 6(1):24-43, 2000. (Pubitemid 30594718)
18. A. Kobsa. User experiments with tree visualization systems. In InfoVis, pages 9-16. IEEE CS, 2004. (Pubitemid 40449122)
19. R. Lengler and M. Eppler. Towards a periodic table of visualization methods for management. In GVE. ACTA Press, 2007.
20. T. Munzner. Drawing large graphs with h3viewer and site manager. In Graph Drawing, pages 384-393. Springer, 1998.
21. D. Nestor, L. O'Malley, P. Healy, A. Quigley, and S. Thiel. Visualisation techniques to support derivation tasks in software product line development. In CASCON, pages 315-325. ACM, 2007.
22. Q. V. Nguyen and M. L. Huang. Enccon: an approach to constructing interactive visualization of large hierarchical data. Information Visualization, 4:1-21, 2005.
23. C. Plaisant. The challenge of information visualization evaluation. In AVI, pages 109-116. ACM, 2004.
24. C. Plaisant, J. Grosjean, and B. B. Bederson. Spacetree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. In InfoVis, pages 57-64. IEEE CS, 2002.
25. R. Rabiser, D. Dhungana, W. Heider, and P. Grünbacher. Flexibility and end-user support in model-based product line tools. In Euromicro SEAA, pages 508-511. IEEE CS, 2009.
26. R. Rabiser, P. Grünbacher, and D. Dhungana. Requirements for product derivation support: Results from a systematic literature review and an expert survey. Information and Software Technology, 52(3):324-346, 2010.
27. M. Rosa, W. van der Aalst, M. Dumas, and A. te Hofstede. Questionnaire-based variability modeling for system configuration. Software and System Modeling, 8(2):251-274, 2009.
28. K. Schmid. A comprehensive product line scoping approach and its validation. In ICSE, pages 593-603. ACM, 2002. (Pubitemid 35009146)
29. K. Schmid and I. John. A customizable approach to full-life cycle variability management. Science of Computer Programming, Special Issue on Variability Management, 53(3):259-284, 2004.
30. K. Schmid, R. Rabiser, and P. Grünbacher. A comparison of decision modeling approaches in product lines. In VaMoS, pages 119-126. ACM, 2011.
31. D. Schneeweiss and G. Botterweck. Using flow maps to visualize product attributes during feature configuration. In VISPLE, pages 219-228. Lancaster Univ., 2010.
32. B. Shneiderman. The eyes have it: A task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In VL, pages 336-343. IEEE Computer Society, 1996.
33. B. Shneiderman and C. Plaisant. Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. Addison Wesley, 4 edition, 2004.
34. M. Sinnema and S. Deelstra. Classifying variability modeling techniques. Information and Software Technology, 49(7):717-739, 2006. (Pubitemid 46754842)
35. M. Torres, U. Kulesza, M. Sousa, T. Batista, L. Teixeira, P. Borba, E. Cirilo, C. Lucena, R. Braga, and P. Masiero. Assessment of product derivation tools in the evolution of software product lines: an empirical study. In FOSD, pages 10-17. ACM, 2010.
36. P. Trinidad, A. Ruiz-Cortes, D. Benavides, and S. Segura. Three-dimensional feature diagrams visualization. In ViSPLE, pages 295-302. Lero, 2008.
37. F. van der Linden, K. Schmid, and E. Rommes. Software Product Lines in Action - The Best Industrial Practice in Product Line Engineering. Springer, 2007.
38. C. Ware. Information Visualization. Morgan Kaufmann, 2nd edition, 2004.
39. S. Wehrend and C. Lewis. A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. In VIS, pages 139-143. IEEE CS, 1990.
40. J. S. Yi, Y. a. Kang, J. Stasko, and J. Jacko. Toward a deeper understanding of the role of interaction in information visualization. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13:1224-1231, 2007. (Pubitemid 350076593)