Evaluation of opinion visualization techniques

Information Visualization

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 339-358

  Shamim, Azra ^a   Balakrishnan, Vimala ^a   Tahir, Muhammad ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

^b Department of Electrical Computer Engineering   (Pakistan)

^c KING ABDULAZIZ UNIVERSITY   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

Information visualization; opinion mining; opinion visualization; sentiment analysis; visual opinion mining

Indexed keywords

DATA MINING; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; MINING MACHINERY; SURVEYS;

DESCRIPTIVE STATISTICS; DESIGN AND DEVELOPMENT; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; OPINION MINING; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEYS; SENTIMENT ANALYSIS; VISUALIZATION METRICS; VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUE;

VISUALIZATION;

EID: 84955244410     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473871614550537     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Dave K, Way I, Lawrence S, et al. Mining the peanut gallery: opinion extraction and semantic classification of product reviews. In: Proceedings of the 12th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '03), 2003, pp. 519-528. New York: ACM Press, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/775152.775226
2. Wu Y, Wei F, Liu S, et al. OpinionSeer: interactive visualization of hotel customer feedback. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2010; 16 (6): 1109-1118.
3. Turney PD, Littman ML,. Measuring praise and criticism: inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Trans Inform Syst 2003; 21 (4): 315-346.
4. Pang B, Lee L,. A sentimental education: sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In: Proceedings of 42nd meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL '04), Barcelona, 21-26 July 2004, pp. 271-278. Association for Computational Linguistics.
5. Gregory ML, Chinchor N, Whitney P, et al. User-directed sentiment analysis: visualizing the affective content of documents. In: Proceedings of the workshop on sentiment and subjectivity in text, Sydney, NSW, Australia, July 2006, pp. 23-30. Stroudsburg, PA: ACL.
6. Wanner F, Rohrdantz C, Mansmann F, et al. Visual sentiment analysis of RSS news feeds featuring the US presidential election in 2008. In: Workshop on visual interfaces to the social and the semantic web (VISSW 2009), Sanibel Island, FL, 8 February 2009.
7. Chen C, Ibekwe-sanjuan F, Sanjuan E, et al. Visual analysis of conflicting opinions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual analytics and technology, Baltimore, MD, 31 October-2 November 2006, pp. 59-66. IEEE.
8. Gamon M, Basu S, Belenko D, et al. BLEWS: using blogs to provide context for news articles. In: Proceedings of the international conference on weblogs and social media, Seattle, WA, 30 March-2 April 2008.
9. Khan M, Khan SS,. Data and information visualization methods, and interactive mechanisms: a survey. Int J Comput Appl 2011; 34 (1): 1-14.
10. Osimo D, Mureddu F,. Research challenge on opinion mining and sentiment analysis. In: Using open data: policy modeling, citizen empowerment, data journalism, 2012, http://www.w3.org/2012/06/pmod/opinionmining.pdf
11. Morinaga S, Yamanishi K, Tateishi K, et al. Mining product reputations on the Web. In: Proceedings of the eighth ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, Edmonton, AB, Canada, 23-25 July 2002, pp. 341-349. New York: ACM Press.
12. Miao Q, Li Q, Dai R,. AMAZING: a sentiment mining and retrieval system. Expert Syst Appl 2009; 36 (3): 7192-7198.
13. Xu K, Liao SS, Li J, et al. Mining comparative opinions from customer reviews for competitive intelligence. Decis Support Syst 2011; 50 (4): 743-754.
14. Gamon M, Aue A, Corston-Oliver S, et al. Pulse: mining customer opinions from free text. In: International symposium on intelligent data analysis, 2005, pp. 121-132, http://www.springerlink.com/index/94q1nrhfc8a4e8tn.pdf (. accessed 12 December 2011).
15. Oelke D, Hao M, Rohrdantz C, et al. Visual opinion analysis of customer feedback data. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology, Atlantic City, NJ, 11-16 October 2009, pp. 187-194. IEEE.
16. Liu B, Hu M, Cheng J,. Opinion observer: analyzing and comparing opinions on the Web. In: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web (WWW '05), 2005, pp. 342-351. New York: ACM Press, http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/1060745.1060797
17. Draper GM, Livnat Y, Riesenfeld RF,. A survey of radial methods for information visualization. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2009; 15 (5): 759-776.
18. Nightingale F,. Notes on matters affecting the health, efficiency, and hospital administration of the British army: founded chiefly on the experience of the late war. London: Harrison and Sons, 1858.
19. Freitas CMDS, Luzzardi PRG, Cava RA, et al. On evaluating information visualization techniques. In: Proceedings of advanced visual interfaces, Trento, 2002, pp. 2-3.
20. ISO 9241-10: 1996. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). Part 10: dialogue principles.
21. ISO 9241-11: 1994. Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals (VDTs). Part 11: guidance on usability. Draft international standard.
22. Mayhew DJ,. Principles and guidelines in software user interface. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1992.
23. Smith SL, Mosier JN,. Design guidelines for user-system interface software, MA: USAF Electronic Systems Division, Hanscom Air Force Base, Massachusetts, USA, 1984.
24. Oulanov A, Pajarillo EJY,. CUNY+ web: usability study of the web-based GUI version of the bibliographic database of the City University of New York (CUNY). Electron Libr 2002; 20 (6): 481-487.
25. Brinck T, Gergle D, Wood SD,. Usability for the web: designing web sites that work. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2002.
26. MIT Information Services and Technology Department. Usability guidelines., 2 2004.
27. Lee KP,. A study on the improvement plan by analyzing user interaction pattern with the RISS. Technical report KR2004-17, 2004. Seoul, South Korea: KERIS.
28. Nielsen J,. Usability engineering. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 1993.
29. Booth P,. Introduction into human-computer interaction. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1989.
30. Zviran M, Glezer C, Avni I,. User satisfaction from commercial web sites: the effect of design and use. Inf Manag 2006; 43 (2): 157-178.
31. Scholtz J,. Beyond usability: evaluation aspects of visual analytic environments. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual analytics science and technology, Baltimore, MD, 31 October-2 November 2006, pp. 145-150. New York: IEEE.
32. Jeong W, Han HH,. Usability study on newspaper mobile websites. OCLC Syst Serv 2012; 28 (4): 180-198.
33. Yushiana M, Rani WA,. Heuristic evaluation of interface usability for a web-based OPAC. Libr Hi Tech 2007; 25 (4): 538-549.
34. Kim HH, Kim YH,. Usability study of digital institutional repositories. Electron Libr 2008; 26 (6): 863-881.
35. Casaló LV, Flavián C, Guinalíu M,. The role of satisfaction and website usability in developing customer loyalty and positive word-of-mouth in the e-banking services. Int J Bank Market 2008; 26 (6): 399-417.
36. Ravendran R, MacColl I, Docherty M,. Usability evaluation of a tag-based interface. J Usability Stud 2012; 7 (4): 143-160.
37. Feizi A, Wong CY,. Usability of user interface styles for learning a graphical software application. In: 2012 International conference on computer & information sciences, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 12-14 June 2012, pp. 1089-1094. New York: IEEE.
38. Van Riel ACR, Liljander V, Jurriëns P,. Exploring consumer evaluations of e-services: a portal site. Int J Serv Ind Manag 2012; 12 (4): 359-377.
39. Dudek D, Mastora A, Landoni M,. Is Google the answer? A study into usability of search engines. Libr Rev 2007; 56 (3): 224-233.
40. Freitas CMDS, Luzzardi PRG, Cava RA, et al. Evaluating usability of information visualization techniques. In: CHI 2002-5th workshop on human factors in computer systems, 2002.
41. Zuk T, Schlesier L, Neumann P, et al. Heuristics for information visualization evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 2006 AVI workshop on beyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization, Venice, 23 May 2006.
42. Zuk T, Carpendale S,. Theoretical analysis of uncertainty visualizations. In: Proceedings of the SPIE-IS&T electronic imaging (ed Erbacher RF, Roberts JC, Gröhn MT, et al.), San Jose, CA, 15 January 2006, vol. 6060. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
43. Amar R, Stasko J,. A knowledge task-based framework for design and evaluation of information visualizations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on information visualization (INFOVIS '04), Austin, TX, 10-12 October 2004, pp. 143-150. New York: IEEE.
44. Shneiderman B,. The eyes have it: a task by data type taxonomy for information visualizations. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on visual languages, Boulder, CO, 3-6 September 1996, pp. 336-343. New York: IEEE.
45. Wehrend S, Lewis C,. A problem-oriented classification of visualization techniques. In: Proceedings of the first IEEE conference on visualization, San Francisco, CA, 23-26 October 1990, pp. 139-143. New York: IEEE.
46. Scholtz J,. Developing qualitative metrics for visual analytic environments. In: Proceedings of the 3rd BELIV '10 workshop: beyond time and errors: novel evaluation methods for information visualization, Atlanta, GA, 10-15 April 2010, pp. 1-7. New York: ACM Press.
47. Forsell C, Johansson J,. An heuristic set for evaluation in information visualization. In: Proceedings of the international conference on advanced visual interfaces (AVI '10), Rome, 25-29 May 2010, pp. 199-206. New York: ACM Press.
48. Brath R,. Metrics for effective information visualization. In: Proceedings of the IEEE symposium on information visualization, Phoenix, AZ, 18-25 October 1997, pp. 108-111. New York: IEEE Computer Society.
49. Connell TAO, Choong Y,. Metrics for measuring human interaction with interactive visualizations for information analysis. In: Proceedings of ACM CHI 2008 conference on human factors in computing systems, Florence, 5-10 April 2008, pp. 1493-1496. New York: ACM Press.
50. Plaisant C, Fekete J-D, Grinstein G,. Promoting insight-based evaluation of visualizations: from contest to benchmark repository. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2007; 14 (1): 120-134.
51. Bai X, White D, Sundaram D,. Purposeful visualization. In: Proceedings of the 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, Kauai, HI, 4-7 January 2011, pp. 1-10. New York: IEEE Computer Society.
52. Tufte ER,. The visual display of quantitative information., 2001. DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(05)70412-8.
53. Bertin J,. Semiology of graphics. Madison, WI: The University of Wisconsin Press, 1983.
54. Ware C,. Information visualization: perception for design. 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, 2004.
55. Wiss U, Carr D, Jonsson H,. Evaluating three-dimensional information visualization designs: a case study of three designs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on information visualization, London, 29-31 July 1998, pp. 137-144. New York: IEEE Computer Society.
56. Scholtz J,. Developing guidelines for assessing visual analytics environments. Inf Vis 2011; 10 (3): 212-231.
57. Lam H, Bertini E, Isenberg P, et al. Empirical studies in information visualization: seven scenarios. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph 2012; 18: 1520-1536.
58. Scholtz J, Plaisant C, Whiting M, et al. Evaluation of visual analytics environments: the road to the visual analytics science and technology challenge evaluation methodology. Inf Vis 2014; 13 (4): 326-335.
59. Brath R,. 3D Interactive information visualization: guidelines from experience and analysis of applications. In: Proceedings of HCI international '97, San Francisco, CA, 24-29 August 1997, pp. 1-5. ELSEVIER.
60. Pillat RM, Valiati ERA, Freitas CMDS,. Experimental study on evaluation of multidimensional information visualization techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Latin American conference on human-computer interaction (CLIHC '05), Cuernavaca, Mexico, 23-26 October 2005, pp. 20-30. New York: ACM Press.
61. Pretorius MC, Calitz AP, Greunen VD,. The added value of eye tracking in the usability evaluation of a network management tool. In: Proceedings of the 2005 annual research conference of the South African institute of computer scientists and information technologists on IT research in developing countries (SAICSIT '05), White River, South Africa, 2005, pp. 1-10. New York: ACM Press.
62. Kang Y-A, Görg C, Stasko J,. How can visual analytics assist investigative analysis? Design implications from an evaluation. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2010; 17 (5): 570-583.
63. Keim DA, Hao MC, Dayal U,. Hierarchical pixel bar charts. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2002; 8 (3): 255-269.
64. Vliegen R, van Wijk JJ, ven der Linden E-J,. Visualization business data with generalized treemaps. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2006; 12 (5): 789-796.
65. Keim DA, Hao MC, Dayal U, et al. Value-cell bar charts for visualizing large transaction data sets. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2007; 13 (4): 822-833.
66. Kratt J, Strobelt H, Deussen O,. Improving stability and compactness in street layout visualizations. In: Proceedings of the vision, modeling, and visualization workshop 2011, Berlin, 4-6 October 2011, pp. 285-292. Mitti, Germany: Eurographics Association.
67. Stasko J, Zhang E,. Focus+context display and navigation techniques for enhancing radial, space-filling hierarchy visualizations. In: IEEE symposium on information visualization, Salt Lake City, UT, 9-10 October 2000, pp. 57-65. New York: IEEE.
68. Elmqvist N, Dragicevic P, Fekete J-D,. Rolling the dice: multidimensional visual exploration using scatterplot matrix navigation. IEEE T Vis Comput Gr 2008; 14 (6): 1141-1148.
69. Hao MC, Dayal U, Sharma RK, et al. Visual analytics of large multi-dimensional data using variable binned scatter plots. In: Proceedings of visualization and data analysis (ed Park J, Hao MC, Wong PC, et al.), San Jose, CA, 17 January 2010, vol. 7530. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.