Innovation trajectories for information visualizations: Comparing treemaps, cone trees, and hyperbolic trees

Information Visualization

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 87-105

  Shneiderman, Ben ^a   Dunne, Cody ^a   Sharma, Puneet ^a   Wang, Ping ^b  

^a Institute of Advanced Computer Science   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

cone tree; graphical user interfaces; hyperbolic tree; information visualization; innovation trajectories; treemap

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC PUBLICATIONS; APPROPRIATE METRICS; DATA COLLECTION; HYPERBOLIC TREE; INFORMATION VISUALIZATION; INNOVATION TRAJECTORIES; LONGITUDINAL DATA; RESEARCH MANAGER; SCIENCE POLICIES; SCIENTOMETRICS; TRADE PRESS; TREE-MAPS; TREEMAP; VENTURE CAPITALISTS;

GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACES; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; TRAJECTORIES;

FORESTRY;

ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INVENTIONS; PATENTS;

EID: 84871767310     PISSN: 14738716     EISSN: 14738724     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1473871611424815     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Moore GA Crossing the Chasm. New York: HarperCollins ; 1991 :
2. Allen TJ Managing the Flow of Information Technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press ; 1977 :
3. Lazowska E. Envisioning the future of computing research. Commun ACM. 2008 ; 51 (8). 28-30
4. Arthur B The Nature of Technology: What It Is and How It Evolves. New York: Free Press ; 2009 :
5. Basalla G The Evolution of Technology. New York: Cambridge University Press ; 1988 :
6. Shneiderman B, Plaisant C Designing the User Interface: Strategies for Effective Human-Computer Interaction. 5 th edn., Section 4.7. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley, 2010.
7. Shneiderman B, Plaisant C. Strategies for evaluating information visualization tools: Multi-dimensional in-depth long-term case studies. Proceedings beyond Time and Errors: Novel Evaluation Methods for Information Visualization, Workshop of the Advanced Visual Interfaces Conference (Available in ACM Digital Library) ; New York: ACM Press, 2006; 1-7.
8. Rogers EM Diffusion of Innovations. 5 th edn.New York: Free Press, 2003. New York: Free Press ; 2003 :
9. Davis FD. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly. 1989 ; 13 (3). 319-340
10. Venkatesh V, Morris MG, Davis GB, Davis FD. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly. 2003 ; 27: 425-478
11. Johnson B, Shneiderman B. Tree-maps: A space filling approach to the visualization of hierarchical information structures. Proceedings IEEE Visualization '91 ; Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1991; 284-291.
12. Shneiderman B. Tree visualization with tree-maps: A 2-d space filling approach. ACM Trans Graph. 1992 ; 11 (1). 92-99
13. Bruls M, Huizing K, van Wijk JJ. Squarified treemaps. Proceedings Joint Eurographics and IEEE TCVG Symposium on Visualization (TCVG 2000) ; Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2000; 33-42.
14. Wattenberg M. Visualizing the stock market. Proceedings Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 99) ; New York: ACM Press, 1999; 188-189.
15. Bederson BB, Shneiderman B, Wattenberg M. Ordered and quantum treemaps: Making effective use of 2D space to display hierarchies. ACM Trans Graph. 2002 ; 21 (4). 833-854
16. http://www.cs.umd.edu/hcil/treemap-history/
17. Robertson GG, Card SK, Mackinlay JD. Information visualization using 3D interactive animation. Commun ACM. 1993 ; 36 (4). 51-71
18. Robertson GG, Mackinlay JD, Card SK. Cone trees: Animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information. Proceedings ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ; New York: ACM Press, 1991; 189-194.
19. Lamping J, Rao R. Laying out and visualizing large trees using a hyperbolic space. Proceedings 7th Annual ACM symposium on User Interface Software and Technology ; New York: ACM Press, 1994; 13-14.
20. Lamping J, Rao R, Pirolli P. A focus+context technique based on hyperbolic geometry for visualizing large hierarchies. Proceedings SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ; New York: ACM Press, 1995; 401-408.
21. http://www.sigchi.org/chi95/proceedings/papers/jl-bdy.htm
22. Nassi I, Shneiderman B. Flowchart techniques for structured programming. ACM SIGPLAN Notices. 1973 ; 8 (8). 12-26
23. Turo D, Johnson B. Improving the visualization of hierarchies with treemaps: Design issues and experimentation. Proceedings IEEE Conference on Visualization 1992 ; Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 1992; 124-131.
24. Stasko J, Catrambone R, Guzdial M, McDonald K. An evaluation of space-filling information visualizations for depicting hierarchical structures. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2000 ; 53 (5). 663-694
25. http://www.win.tue.nl/sequoiaview
26. http://www.smartmoney.com/marketmap
27. http://www.newsmap.jp
28. http://www.news.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/03/31/2332203
29. http://manyeyes.alphaworks.ibm.com
30. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List-of-Treemapping-Software
31. Carriere J, Kazman R IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis '95). Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press ; 1995: 74-81.
32. Cockburn A, McKenzie B People and Computers XIV: British Computer Society Conference on Human Computer Interaction. London, UK: Springer-Verlag ; 2000: 425-436.
33. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1eO1pgTVu-g
34. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pwpze3RF55o and http://www.sigchi.org/ chi96/proceedings/videos/Lamping/hb-video.html
35. http://www.sap.com/solutions/sapbusinessobjects/large/ business-intelligence/dashboard-visualization/advanced-visualization/index.epx
36. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hyperbolic-tree
37. http://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/map2.html
38. http://hypergraph.sourceforge.net/examples-general.html
39. AllenMM. The Hype Over Hyperbolic Browsers, ONLINE 26, 3 (May/June 2002). 2002. http://www.onlinemag.net/may02/allen.htm
40. MulletKFryCSchianoD. On your marks, get set, browse! (The Great CHI'97 Browse Off). ACM CHI'97 Conference Extended Abstracts. New York: ACM Press, 1997; 113-114. http://www.sigchi.org/chi97/proceedings/panel/kem.htm
41. Pirolli P, Card S, Van Der Wege M. The effects of information scent on visual search in the hyperbolic tree browser. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact. 2003 ; 10 (1). 20-53
42. Plaisant C, Grosjean J, Bederson B. SpaceTree: Supporting exploration in large node link tree, design evolution and empirical evaluation. Proceedings IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis) ; Piscataway, NJ: IEEE Press, 2002; 57-64.
43. Xiang Y, Chau M, Atabakhish H, Chen H. Visualizing criminal relationships: Comparison of a hyperbolic tree and a hierarchical list. Decis Support Syst. 2005 ; 41 (1). 69-83
44. Cockburn A, Karlson A, Bederson BB. A review of overview+detail, zooming, and focus+context interfaces. ACM Comput Surv. 2008 ; 41 (1). B:1 - B:31
45. Bartneck C, Hu J. Scientometric analysis of the CHI proceedings. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ; New York: ACM Press: 2009; 699-708.
46. http://portal.acm.org (subscription required).
47. http://patft.uspto.gov
48. http://www.lexisnexis.com/us/lnacademic (subscription required).
49. Garfield E. Historiographic mapping of knowledge domains literature. J Inform Sci. 2004 ; 30 (2). 119-145
50. Garfield E, Pudovkin AI, Istomin VI. Why do we need algorithmic historiography?. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2003 ; 54 (5). 400-412
51. Morris S, Van der Veer Martens B. Mapping research specialties. Annu Rev Inform Sci Tech. 2008 ; 42 (1). 213-295
52. Morris SA, Yen G, Zheng W, Asnake B. Time line visualization of research fronts. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2003 ; 54 (5). 413-422
53. HenryNGoodellHElmqvistNFeketeJ-D. 20 years of four HCI conferences: A visual exploration. Int J Hum Comput Interact2007; 23(3): 239-285. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10447310701702402
54. Chen C. CiteSpace II: Detecting and visualizing emerging trends and transient patterns in scientific literature. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2006 ; 57 (3). 359-377
55. Chen C, Ibekwe-SanJuan F, Hou J. The structure and dynamics of co-citation clusters: A multiple-perspective co-citation analysis. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol. 2010 ; 61 (7). 1386-1409
56. Uren V, Buckingham Shum S, Bachler M, Li G. Sensemaking tools for understanding research literatures: Design, implementation and user evaluation. Int J Hum Comput Stud. 2006 ; 64 (5). 420-445
57. Aris A, Shneiderman B, Qazvinian V, Radev D. Visual overviews for discovering key papers and influences across research fronts. J Am Soc Inform Syst Tech. 2009 ; 60 (11). 2219-2228
58. Wang P, Ramiller NC. Community learning in information technology innovations. MIS Quarterly. 2009 ; 33 (4). 709-734
59. Wang P. Popular concepts beyond organizations: Exploring new dimensions of information technology innovations. J Assoc Inform Syst. 2009 ; 10 (1). 1-30
60. Wang P, Swanson EB. Launching professional services automation: Institutional entrepreneurship for information technology innovations. Inform Organ. 2007 ; 17 (2). 59-88
61. Fenn J, Raskino M Mastering the Hype Cycle: How to Choose the Right Innovation at the Right Time. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press ; 2008 :
62. Computer Science and Telecommunications Board. Innovation in Information Technology. Washington, DC: National Academies Press, 2003. http://www.nap.edu/ catalog.php?record-id=10795. ISBN-10: 0-309-09029-6.
63. www.ipwatchdog.com/2009/04/22/uspto-backlog-patent-pendency-out-of- control/id=2848
64. Blanch R, Lecolinet E. Browsing zoomable treemaps: Structure-aware multi-scale navigation techniques. IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2007 ; 13 (6). 1248-1253
65. Ogle R Smart World: Breakthrough Creativity and the New Science of Ideas. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press ; 2007 :
66. http://www.ramanarao.com/informationflow/archive/2003-02.html
67. Shneiderman B. Why not make user interfaces better than 3D reality?. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2003 ; 23 (6). 12-15
68. Shneiderman B. Shneiderman B., Declaration in Apple vs. Microsoft/Hewlett-Packard, In Sparks of Innovation in Human-Computer Interaction (B. Shneiderman, editor), Ablex Publishers, Norwood, NJ (1993), 355-361.