Measuring the effects of public support schemes on firms' innovation activities. Survey evidence from Austria

Research Policy

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 665-679

  Falk, Rahel ^a  

^a AUSTRIAN INSTITUTE OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH WIFO   (Austria)

Author keywords

Innovation policy; Methods; Policy evaluation

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL MANAGEMENT; PUBLIC POLICY; PUBLIC UTILITIES; SURVEYING;

AUSTRIAN FIRMS; CONVENTIONAL DESCRIPTIVE METHODS; INNOVATION POLICY; POLICY EVALUATION;

INNOVATION;

EID: 34249678479     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.005     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arrow K.J. Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: Nelson R.R. (Ed). The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors (1962), Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ 609-625
2. Aslesen H.W., Broch M., Koch P.M., and Solum N.H. User Oriented R&D in the Research Council of Norway (2001), Technopolis RCN Evaluation, Oslo
3. Bach, L., Matt, M., 2002. Rationale for science and technology policy. In: Georgiou, L., Rigby, J., (Eds.), Assessing the socio-economic impacts of the Framework Programme. Report to European Commission DG Research.
4. Branstetter L.G., and Sakakibara M. When do research consortia work well and why? Evidence from Japanese panel data. American Economic Review 92, 1 (2002) 143-159
5. Buisseret T.J., Cameron H.M., and Georghiou L. What difference does it make? Additionality in the public support of R&D in large firms. International Journal of Technology Management 10 (1995) 587-600
6. Czarnitzki, D., Ebersberger B., Fier, A., 2004. The relationship between R&D collaboration, subsidies and patenting activity: empirical evidence from Finland and Germany. ZEW Discussion Paper No. 04-37.
7. Davenport S., Grimes C., and Davies J. Research collaboration and behavioural additionality: a New Zealand case study. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management 10,1 (1998) 55-67
8. David P.A., Hall B.H., and Toole A.A. Is public R&D a complement or substitute for private R&D? A review of the econometric evidence. Research Policy 29 (2000) 497-529
9. In: Dodgson M., and Rothwell R. (Eds). The handbook of industrial innovation (1994), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
10. Fagerberg J., Mowery D.C., and Nelson R.R. The Oxford Handbook of Innovation (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford
11. Falk, M., 2004. An empirical analysis of factors explaining the level of R&D subsidies and their productivity effects. Tip Working Paper No. 04-01.
12. Fransman M. The Market and Beyond: Cooperation and Competition in Information Technology (1990), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
13. Freeman C. The economics of technical change. Cambridge Journal of Economics 18 (1994) 463-514
14. Garcia, A., Mohnen, P., 2004. Impact of government funding on R&D and innovation. Background Report to the European Competitiveness Report 2004, Chapter 2.4.1.
15. García-Quevedo J. Do public subsidies complement business R&D? A meta-analysis of the econometric evidence. Kyklos 57,1 (2004) 87-102
16. Georghiou L. Issues in the evaluation of innovation and technology policy. In: OECD (Ed). Policy Evaluation in Innovation and Technology: Towards Best Practice, OECD (1997), Paris (Chapter 3)
17. Georghiou L., and Roessner D. Evaluating technology programs: tools and methods. Research Policy 29 (2000) 657-678
18. Georghiou, L., 2002. Impact and additionality of innovation policy, IWT-Studies No. 40, 57-65.
19. Georghiou L., Smith K., Toivanen O., and Ylä-Anttila P. Evaluation of the Finnish innovation support system (2003), Ministry of Trade and Industry, Finland
20. Gottschalk, S., Janz, N., 2003. Bestimmungsfaktoren der Innovationstätigkeit. In: Janz, N., Licht, G., (Eds.), Innovationsforschung heute. ZEW Wirtschaftsanalysen, 63, Baden-Baden, pp. 17-39.
21. Hyvärinen J. Behavioural additionality of public R&D funding in Finland. In: OECD (Ed). Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality (2006), OECD, Paris 115-126 Evaluating government financing of business R&D: Measuring behavioural additonality, OECD, Paris, Chapter 6.
22. Klette T.J., Møen J., and Griliches Z. Do subsidies to commercial R&D reduce market failure? Microeconometric evaluation studies. Research Policy 29 (2000) 471-495
23. Luukkonen T. Additionality of EU framework programmes. Research Policy 29 (2000) 711-724
24. Metcalfe S. The economic foundations of technology policy: Equilibrium and evolutionary perspectives. In: Stoneman P. (Ed). Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change (1995), Blackwell, Oxford
25. Nelson R.R. The simple economics of basic scientific research. Journal of Political Economy 67 (1959) 297-306
26. In: OECD (Ed). Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality (2006), OECD, Paris
27. Papaconstantiou G., and Polt W. Policy evaluation in innovation and technology: an overview. In: OECD (Ed). Policy Evaluation in Innovation and Technology: Towards Best Practice, OECD (1997), Paris (Chapter 1)
28. Pegler, B., 2005. Behavioural additionality in Australian business R&D grant programs: A pilot study. Paper presented at the OECD Workshop on Behavioural Additionality in Vienna, January 2005. http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/33/18/34538967.pdf.
29. Rigby, J., 2003. ASIF: Evaluating socio-economic impact, Plattform Forschungs-und Technologieevaluierung No. 03-17, 13-17.
30. Schibany, A., Streicher, G., Gretzmacher, N., Falk, M., Falk, R., Knoll, N., Schwarz, G., Wörter, M., 2004. Evaluation FFF-impact analysis, In: TeReg Research Report Series No. 04-22.
31. Sakakibara M. Evaluating government-sponsored R&D consortia in Japan: who benefits and how. Research Policy 26 (1997) 447-473
32. Shipp, S., Wisniewski, L., Wang, A., Campbell, S, 2006. Behavioural additionality of the US Advanced Technology Programme. In: OECD, (Ed.), Government R&D Funding and Company Behaviour: Measuring Behavioural Additionality. OECD, Paris, pp. 219-233.
33. Stoneman P., and Vickers J. The assessment: the economics of technology policy. Oxford Review of Economic Policy 4 (1988) 1-16
34. Streicher, G., Schibany, A., Gretzmacher, N., 2004. Input additionality effects of R&D subsidies: empirical evidence from firm-level data. TIP Working Paper, 04-03.
35. Sundbo J. The Theory of Innovation: Entrepreneurs, Technology and Strategy (1998), Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham
36. Tether B. The sources and aims of innovation in services: variety between and within sectors. Economics of Innovation and New Technology 12, 6 (2003) 481-505
37. Wong P.-K., and He Z.-L. The moderating effect of a firm's internal climate for innovation on the impact of public R&D support programmes. International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 3 (2003) 525-545