What are the decision-making preferences of patients in vascular surgery? A mixed-methods study

BMJ Open

Volumn 7, Issue 2, 2017, Pages

  Santema, T B Katrien ^a   Stoffer, E Anniek ^a   Kunneman, Marleen ^a   Koelemay, Mark J W ^a   Ubbink, Dirk T ^a  

^a ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

patient preferences; patient involvement; shared decision making

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTPATIENT DEPARTMENT; PATIENT AUTONOMY; PATIENT DECISION MAKING; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERIPHERAL OCCLUSIVE ARTERY DISEASE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; SHARED DECISION MAKING; VASCULAR SURGERY; ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; VERY ELDERLY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; ARTERIAL OCCLUSIVE DISEASES; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT PREFERENCE; PERIPHERAL ARTERIAL DISEASE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; VASCULAR SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 85012292668     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013272     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Stiggelbout AM, Van der Weijden T, De Wit MP, et al. Shared decision making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ 2012;344:e256.
2. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Intern Med 2012;27:1361-7.
3. Elwyn G, Laitner S, Coulter A, et al. Implementing shared decision making in the NHS. BMJ 2010;341:c5146.
4. Charles C, Gafni A, Whelan T. Shared decision-making in the medical encounter: what does it mean? (or it takes at least two to tango). Social Sci Med 1997;44:681-92.
5. Coulter A. Partnerships with patients: the pros and cons of shared clinical decision making. J Health Serv Res Policy 1997;2:112-21.
6. Emanuel EJ, Emanuel LL. Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 1992;267:2221-6.
7. Knops AM, Legemate DA, Goossens A, et al. Decision aids for patients facing a surgical treatment decision: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg 2013;257:860-6.
8. Stacey D, Bennett CL, Barry MJ, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(1):CD001431.
9. Griffin SJ, Kinmonth AL, Veltman MW, et al. Effect on health-related outcomes of interventions to alter the interaction between patients and practitioners: a systematic review of trials. Ann Fam Med 2004;2:595-608.
10. Oshima Lee E, Emanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med 2013;368:6-8.
11. Hack TF, Degner LF, Watson P, et al. Do patients benefit from participating in medical decision making? Longitudinal follow-up of women with breast cancer. Psychooncology 2006;15:9-19.
12. Naik AD, Kallen MA, Walder A, et al. Improving hypertension control in diabetes mellitus: the effects of collaborative and proactive health communication. Circulation 2008;117:1361-8.
13. Wilson SR, Strub P, Buist AS, et al. Shared treatment decision making improves adherence and outcomes in poorly controlled asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010;181:566-77.
14. Moll FL, Powell JT, Fraedrich G, et al. Management of abdominal aortic aneurysms clinical practice guidelines of the European society for vascular surgery. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 2011;41:S1-S58.
15. Norgren L, Hiatt WR, Dormandy JA, et al. Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC II). Eur J Vasc Endovasc 2007;33(Suppl 1):S1-75.
16. Faggioli G, Scalone L, Mantovani LG, et al. Preferences of patients, their family caregivers and vascular surgeons in the choice of abdominal aortic aneurysms treatment options: the PREFER study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 2011;42:26-34.
17. Santema TB, Stubenrouch FE, Koelemay MJ, et al. Shared decision making in vascular. Surgery: an exploratory study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 2016;51:587-93.
18. Légaré F, Witteman HO. Shared decision making: examining key elements and barriers to adoption into routine clinical practice. Health Affairs 2013;32:276-84.
19. Légaré F, Ratte S, Gravel K, et al. Barriers and facilitators to implementing shared decision-making in clinical practice: update of a systematic review of health professionals' perceptions. Patient Educ Couns 2008;73:526-35.
20. Siracuse JJ, Meltzer EC, Gill HL, et al. Outcomes and risk factors of cardiac arrest after vascular surgery procedures. J Vasc Surg 2015;61:197-202.
21. Knops AM, Ubbink DT, Legemate DA, et al. Information communicated with patients in decision making about their abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur J Vasc Endovasc 2010;39:708-13.
22. Creswell JW, Olano Clark VL. Designing and conducting mixed methods research. 2nd edn. USA: Sage Publications, 2011.
23. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care 2007;19:349-57.
24. Degner LF, Sloan JA, Venkatesh P. The control preferences scale. Can J Nurs Res 1997;29:21-43.
25. Stiggelbout AM, Molewijk AC, Otten W, et al. Ideals of patient autonomy in clinical decision making: a study on the development of a scale to assess patients' and physicians' views. J Med Ethics 2004;30:268-74.
26. Kriston L, Scholl I, Holzel L, et al. The 9-item Shared Decision Making Questionnaire (SDM-Q-9). Development and psychometric properties in a primary care sample. Patient Educ Couns 2010;80:94-9.
27. Elwyn G, Barr PJ, Grande SW, et al. Developing Collabo RATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of shared decision making in clinical encounters. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93:102-7.
28. Barr PJ, Thompson R, Walsh T, et al. The psychometric properties of Collabo RATE: a fast and frugal patient-reported measure of the shared decision-making process. J Med Internet Res 2014;16:e2.
29. Henrikson NB, Davison BJ, Berry DL. Measuring decisional control preferences in men newly diagnosed with prostate cancer. J Psychosoc Oncol 2011;29:606-18.
30. Scholl I, Koelewijn-van Loon M, Sepucha K, et al. Measurement of shared decision making-a review of instruments. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundhwes 2011;105:313-24.
31. Salkeld G, Solomon M, Short L, et al. A matter of trust-patient's views on decision-making in colorectal cancer. Health Expect 2004;7:104-14.
32. Guest G, Bunce A, Johnson L. How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods 2006;18:59-82.
33. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005;15:1277-88.
34. Kunneman M, Engelhardt EG, Ten Hove FL, et al. Deciding about (neo-) adjuvant rectal and breast cancer treatment: missed opportunities for shared decision making. Acta Oncol 2016;55:134-9.
35. Shay LA, Lafata JE. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med Decis Making 2015;35:114-31.
36. Kasper J, Heesen C, Kopke S, et al. Patients' and observers' perceptions of involvement differ. Validation study on inter-relating measures for shared decision making. PLoS ONE 2011;6:e26255.
37. Ford S, Schofield T, Hope T. Observing decision-making in the general practice consultation: who makes which decisions? Health Expect 2006;9:130-7.
38. Couet N, Desroches S, Robitaille H, et al. Assessments of the extent to which health-care providers involve patients in decision making: a systematic review of studies using the OPTION instrument. Health Expect 2015;18:542-61.
39. Mulley AG, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Stop the silent misdiagnosis: patients' preferences matter. BMJ 2012;345:e6572.
40. Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns 2014;94:291-309.
41. Street RL Jr, De Haes HC. Designing a curriculum for communication skills training from a theory and evidence-based perspective. Patient Educ Couns 2013;93:27-33.