Recommendations for the involvement of Patient Research Partners (PRP) in OMERACT working groups. A report from the OMERACT 2014 working group on PRP

Journal of Rheumatology

Volumn 43, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 187-193

  Cheung, Peter P ^a   De Wit, Maarten ^b   Bingham, Clifton O ^c   Kirwan, John R ^d   Leong, Amye ^e   March, Lyn M ^f   Montie, Pam ^g   Scholte Voshaar, Marieke ^h   Gossec, Laure ^i,j  

^a NATIONAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^e HEALTHY MOTIVATION   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^g ARTHRITIS RESEARCH CENTRE OF CANADA   (Canada)

^h UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

ⁱ SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

^j PITIÉ SALPÊTRIÈRE HOSPITAL   (France)

more..

Author keywords

Omeract; Patient involvement; Patient research partners; Recommendations; Rheumatology research

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; FEMALE; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RESEARCH; RHEUMATIC DISEASES; RHEUMATOLOGY; STANDARDS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCES AS TOPIC; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RESEARCH; RHEUMATIC DISEASES; RHEUMATOLOGY;

EID: 85011915866     PISSN: 0315162X     EISSN: 14992752     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.141011     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Boote J, Barber R, Cooper C. Principles and indicators of successful consumer involvement in NHS research: results of a Delphi study and subgroup analysis. Health Policy 2006;75:280-97.
2. de Wit M, Abma T, Koelewijn-van Loon M, Collins S, Kirwan J. Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: a responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002241.
3. Kirwan J, Heiberg T, Hewlett S, Hughes R, Kvien T, Ahlmen M, et al. Outcomes from the patient perspective workshop at OMERACT 6. J Rheumatol 2003;30:86.
4. Tugwell P, Boers M, D'Agostino MA, Beaton D, Boonen A, Bingham CO 3rd, et al. Updating the OMERACT Filter: Implications of Filter 2.0 to select outcome instruments through assessment of "truth": content, face and construct validity. J Rheumatol 2014;41:1000-4.
5. Patient Centred Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). The power of partnership in research: improving healthcare outcomes in underserved communities. 2013. [Internet. Accessed March 3, 2015.] Available from: www.pcori.org
6. Williamson PR, Altman DG, Blazeby JM, Clarke M, Gargon E. The COMET (Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials) Initiative. Trials 2011;12 Suppl 1:A70.
7. de Wit M, Berlo SE, Aanerud GJ, Aletaha D, Bijlsma JW, Croucher L, et al. European League Against Rheumatism recommendations for the inclusion of patient representatives in scientific projects. Ann Rheum Dis 2011;70:722-6.
8. Kirwan JR, Boers M, Tugwell P. Updating the OMERACT filter at OMERACT 11. J Rheumatol 2014;41:975-7.
9. Ahmed SM, Palermo AS. Community engagement in research: frameworks for education and peer review. Am J Pub Health 2010;10:1380-7.
10. Blair T, Minkler M. Participatory action research with older adults: key principles in practice. Gerontologist 2009;49:651-62.
11. Kent A. Guidance on effective involvement of patients. Draft guidelines on effective involvement (2006). Draft guideline on good practice on patient and public engagement in HTA [Internet. Accessed March 16, 2015.] Available from: www.htai.org/index.php?id=746#c2730
12. Lindenmeyer A, Hearnshaw H, Sturt J, Ormerod R, Aitchison G. Assessment of the benefits of user involvement in health research from the Warwick Diabetes Care research user group: a qualitative case study. Health Expect 2007;10:268-77.
13. Marsden J, Bradburn J. Patient and clinician collaboration in the design of a national randomized breast cancer trial. Health Expect 2004;7:6-17.
14. Patient Centred Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI). The power of partnership in research: improving healthcare outcomes in underserved communities. [Internet. Accessed March 3, 2015.] Available from: www.pcori.org/assets/2013/08/PCORI-Regional-Workshop-Memphis-Morning-Presentations-080113.pdf
15. Staniszewska S, Brett J, Mockford C, Barber R. The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 2011;27:391-9.
16. Abma TA, Nierse CJ, Widdershoven GA. Patients as partners in responsive research: Methodological notions for collaborations in mixed research terms. Qual Health Res 2009;19:401-15.
17. Caldon LJ, Marshall-Cork H, Speed G, Reed MW, Collins KA. Consumers as researchers - innovative experiences in UK National Health Service Research. Int J Consumer Studies 2010;34:547-50.
18. Guise JM, O'Haire C, McPheeters M, Most C, LaBrant L, Lee K, et al. A practice-based tool for engaging stakeholders in future research: a synthesis of current practices. J Clin Epidemiol 2013;66:666-74.
19. Hewlett S, Wit Md, Richards P, Quest E, Hughes R, Heiberg T, Kirwan J. Patients and professionals as research partners: challenges, practicalities, and benefits. Arthritis Rheum 2006;55:676-80.
20. Katz ML, Archer LE, Peppercorn JM, Kereakoglow S, Collyar DE, Burstein HJ, et al. Patients advocates' role in clinical trials: perspectives from Cancer and Leukemia Group B investigators and advocates. Cancer 2012;118:4801-5.
21. Nierse CJ, Schipper K, van Zadelhoff E, van de Griendt J, Abma TA. Collaboration and co-ownership in research: dynamics and dialogues between patient research partners and professional researchers in a research team. Health Expect 2012;15:242-54.
22. Rhodes P, Nocon A, Booth M, Chowdrey MY, Fabian A, Lambert N, et al. A service users' research advisory group from the perspectives of both service users and researchers. Health Soc Care Community 2002;10:402-9.
23. Stevens T, Wilde D, Hunt J, Ahmedzai SH. Overcoming the challenges to consumer involvement in cancer research. Health Expect 2003;6:81-8.
24. Wright D, Foster C, Amir Z, Elliott J, Wilson R. Critical appraisal guidelines for assessing the quality and impact of user involvement in research. Health Expect 2010;13:359-68.
25. Boers M, Kirwan JR, Tugwell P, Beaton D, Bingham CO 3rd, Conaghan PG, et al. The OMERACT handbook. [Internet. Accessed March 3, 2015.] Available from: www.omeract.org/pdf/OMERACT-Handbook.pdf
26. US Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for clinical investigators, industry, and FDA staff. Financial disclosure by clinical investigators. [Internet. Accessed March 3, 2015.] Available from: www.fda.gov/downloads/RegulatoryInformation/Guidances/UCM341008.pdf
27. de Wit MP, Elberse JE, Broerse JE, Abma TA. Do not forget the professional - the value of the FIRST model for guiding the structural involvement of patients in rheumatology research. Health Expect 2013 Jan 31 (E-pub ahead of print)
28. de Wit M, Abma T, Koelewijn-van Loon M, Collins S, Kirwan J. Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences - lessons learned from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003311.