What have i learned from all this? four years of teaching an action research course: Insights of a ‘second order’

Educational Action Research

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 33-58

  Orland Barak, Lily ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAIFA   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011742582     PISSN: 09650792     EISSN: 17475074     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09650790400200238     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Belleli, L., 1993. “ How We Teach and Why: the implementation of an action research model for in-service training ”. In Teacher Develop Teachers’ Research, Edited by: Edge, J., and Richards, K., Oxford: Heinemann. (Orland)
2. Biott, C., 2002. “ Latency in Action Research: changing perspectives on occupational and research identities ”. In Theory and Practice in Action Research, Edited by: Day, C., Elliott, J., Somekh, B., and Winter, R., Wallingford: Symposium Books.
3. Britzman, D., and Pitt, A. J., 1997. “ Pedagogy in Transferential Time: casting the past of learning in the presence of teaching ”. In Action Research as Living Practice, Edited by: Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J., New York: Peter Lang.
4. Carson, T. R., 1997. “ Reflection and Its Resistances: teacher education as a living practice ”. In Action Research as Living Practice, Edited by: Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J., New York: Peter Lang.
5. Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J., eds. 1997. Action Research as Living Practice, New York: Peter Lang.
6. Christenson, M., Slutsky, R., Bendau, S., Covert, J., Dyer, J., Risko, G., and Johnston, M., 2002. The Rocky Road of Teachers Becoming Action Researchers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18: 259–272.
7. Clark, C. M., 1995. Thoughtful Teaching, New York: Teachers College Record.
8. Day, C., 1998. Working with the Different Selves of Teachers: beyond comfortable collaboration. Educational Action Research, 6: 255–273.
9. Day, C., Elliott, J., Somekh, B., and Winter, R., eds. 2002. Theory and Practice in Action Research, Wallingford: Symposium Books.
10. Elliot, J., 1993. “ Academics and Action Research: the training workshop as an exercise in ideological deconstruction ”. In Reconstructing Teacher Education, Edited by: Elliott, J., London: Falmer Press.
11. Feldman, A., Existential Approaches to Action Research. Educational Action Research, 10233–251.
12. Floden, R., AERA Consensus Panel on Teacher Education: a progress report. paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, April. New Orleans
13. Green, K., 1999. Defining the Field of Literature in Action Research: a personal approach. Educational Action Research, 7: 105–123.
14. Green, K., 2002. “ Defining the Field of Literature in Action Research: a personal approach ”. In Theory and Practice in Action Research, Edited by: Day, C., Elliott, J., Somekh, B., and Winter, R., Wallingford: Symposium Books.
15. Grimmett, P. P., 1997. “ Breaking the Mold: transforming a didactic professor into learner-focused teacher educator ”. In Action Research as Living Practice, Edited by: Carson, R. T., and Sumara, J. D., New York: Peter Lang.
16. Houtekamer, T., Chambers, C., Yamagishi, R., and Good Striker, E., 1997. “ Exploring Sacred Relationships: collaborative writing as action research ”. In Action Research as Living Practice, Edited by: Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J., New York: Peter Lang.
17. Kanu, Y., 1997. “ Understanding Development Education through Action Research: cross-cultural reflections ”. In Action Research as Living Practice, Edited by: Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J., New York: Peter Lang.
18. Kemmis, S., and McTaggart, R., 1988. The Action Research Planner, Geelong: Deakin University Press.
19. Kemp, P., 1997. Supporting the Supporters: the learning and supervision needs of unqualified support staff in a supported housing scheme for people with mental health problems. Educational Action Research, 5: 193–209.
20. Matusov, E., 2000. Intersubjectivity as a Way of Informing Teacher Design for a Community of Learners Classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17: 383–402.
21. Miller Marsh, M., and Vagliardo, M., 2002. The Commingling of Teacher Researcher Identities: a mediated approach to teaching action research. Educational Action Research, 10: 275–289.
22. Noffke, S. E., 2002. “ Action Research: towards the next generation ”. In Theory and Practice in Action Research, Edited by: Day, C., Elliott, J., Somekh, B., and Winter, R., Wallingford: Symposium Books.
23. O'Hanlon, C., 2002. “ Reflection and Action Research: is there a moral responsibility to act? ”. In Theory and Practice in Action Research, Edited by: Day, C., Elliott, J., Somekh, B., and Winter, R., Wallingford: Symposium Books.
24. O'Sullivan, M. C., 2002. Action Research and the Transfer of Reflective Approaches to In-service Education and Training (INSET) for Unqualified and Underqualified Primary Teachers in Namibia. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18: 523–539.
25. Peshkin, A., 2000. The Nature of Interpretation in Qualitative Research. Educational Researcher, 29: 5–10.
26. Rearick, M. L., and Feldman, A., 1999. Orientations, Purposes and Reflection: a framework for understanding action research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15: 333–349.
27. Reason, P., 1994. “ Three Approaches to Participative Inquiry ”. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, Edited by: Denzin, N., and Lincon, Y., Thousand Oaks: Sage.
28. Reed, Y., Davis, H., and Nyabanyaba, T., 2002. Investigating Teachers’ ‘Take-up’ of Reflective Practice from an In-service Professional Development Teacher Education Programme in South Africa. Educational Action Research, 10: 253–274.
29. Smits, H., 1997. “ Living within the Space of Practice: action research inspired by hermeneutics ”. In Action Research as Living Practice, Edited by: Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J., New York: Peter Lang.
30. Somekh, B., 2002. “ Inhabiting Each Other's Castles: towards knowledge and mutual growth through collaboration ”. In Theory and Practice in Action Research, Edited by: Day, C., Elliott, J., Somekh, B., and Winter, R., Wallingford: Symposium Books.
31. Straker, A., and Hall, E., 1999. From Clarity to Chaos and Back: some reflections on the research process. Educational Action Research, 7: 419–432.
32. Strauss, P., 2002. “ No Easy Answers: the dilemmas and challenges of teacher research ”. In Theory and Practice in Action Research, Edited by: Day, C., Elliott, J., Somekh, B., and Winter, R., Wallingford: Symposium Books.
33. Sumara, D. J., and Carson, T., 1997. “ Editors’ Introduction: reconceptualizing action research as a living practice ”. In Action Research as Living Practice, Edited by: Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J., New York: Peter Lang.
34. Sumara, D. J., and Davis, B., 1997. “ Enlarging the Space of the Possible: complexity, complicity, and action research practices ”. In Action Research as Living Practice, Edited by: Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J., New York: Peter Lang.
35. Watts, B., and Jones, S., 2002. “ Inter-professional Practice and Action Research: commonalities and parallels ”. In Theory and Practice in Action Research, Edited by: Day, C., Elliott, J., Somekh, B., and Winter, R., Wallingford: Symposium Books.
36. Willinsky, J., 1997. “ Accountability in Action ”. In Action Research as Living Practice, Edited by: Carson, T. R., and Sumara, D. J., New York: Peter Lang.
37. Zeichner, K. M., 1993. Action Research: personal renewal and social reconstruction. Educational Action Research, 1: 199–220.