Deep learning in color: towards automated quark/gluon jet discrimination

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 2017, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Komiske, Patrick T ^a   Metodiev, Eric M ^a   Schwartz, Matthew D ^b  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Jets

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011307893     PISSN: 11266708     EISSN: 10298479     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP01(2017)110     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. ATLAS collaboration, A neural network clustering algorithm for the ATLAS silicon pixel detector, 2014 JINST 9 P09009 [arXiv:1406.7690] [INSPIRE].
2. ATLAS collaboration, Performance of b-jet identification in the ATLAS experiment, 2016 JINST 11 P04008 [arXiv:1512.01094] [INSPIRE].
3. M. Tosi, Performance of tracking, b-tagging and jet/MET reconstruction at the CMS high level trigger, J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 664 (2015) 082055.
4. CMS collaboration, Performance of tau-lepton reconstruction and identification in CMS, 2012 JINST 7 P01001 [arXiv:1109.6034] [INSPIRE].
5. NNPDF collaboration, R.D. Ball et al., Parton distributions for the LHC Run II, JHEP 04 (2015) 040 [arXiv:1410.8849] [INSPIRE].
6. J. Gallicchio, J. Huth, M. Kagan, M.D. Schwartz, K. Black and B. Tweedie, Multivariate discrimination and the Higgs + W/Z search, JHEP 04 (2011) 069 [arXiv:1010.3698] [INSPIRE].
7. T. Maggipinto et al., Role of neural networks in the search of the Higgs boson at LHC, Phys. Lett. B 409 (1997) 517 [hep-ex/9705020] [INSPIRE].
8. CMS collaboration, Search for supersymmetry in events with opposite-sign dileptons and missing transverse energy using an artificial neural network, Phys. Rev. D 87 (2013) 072001 [arXiv:1301.0916] [INSPIRE].
9. − search with deep learning, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114 (2015) 111801 [arXiv:1410.3469] [INSPIRE].
10. J. Cogan, M. Kagan, E. Strauss and A. Schwarztman, Jet-images: computer vision inspired techniques for jet tagging, JHEP 02 (2015) 118 [arXiv:1407.5675] [INSPIRE].
11. L.G. Almeida, M. Backović, M. Cliche, S.J. Lee and M. Perelstein, Playing tag with ANN: boosted top identification with pattern recognition, JHEP 07 (2015) 086 [arXiv:1501.05968] [INSPIRE].
12. L. de Oliveira, M. Kagan, L. Mackey, B. Nachman and A. Schwartzman, Jet-images — Deep learning edition, JHEP 07 (2016) 069 [arXiv:1511.05190] [INSPIRE].
13. P. Baldi, K. Bauer, C. Eng, P. Sadowski and D. Whiteson, Jet substructure classification in high-energy physics with deep neural networks, Phys. Rev. D 93 (2016) 094034 [arXiv:1603.09349] [INSPIRE].
14. D. Guest, J. Collado, P. Baldi, S.-C. Hsu, G. Urban and D. Whiteson, Jet flavor classification in high-energy physics with deep neural networks, Phys. Rev. D 94 (2016) 112002 [arXiv:1607.08633] [INSPIRE].
15. J. Barnard, E.N. Dawe, M.J. Dolan and N. Rajcic, Parton shower uncertainties in jet substructure analyses with deep neural networks, arXiv:1609.00607 [INSPIRE].
16. A. Krizhevsky, I. Sutskever and G.E. Hinton, Imagenet classification with deep convolutional neural networks, in the proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2012), December 3-8, Lake Tahoe, U.S.A. (2012).
17. J. Pumplin, How to tell quark jets from gluon jets, Phys. Rev. D 44 (1991) 2025 [INSPIRE].
18. L. Lönnblad, C. Peterson and T. Rögnvaldsson, Finding gluon jets with a neural trigger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 1321.
19. OPAL collaboration, A Study of differences between quark and gluon jets using vertex tagging of quark jets, Z. Phys. C 58 (1993) 387.
20. OPAL collaboration, A direct observation of quark-gluon jet differences at LEP, Phys. Lett. B 265 (1991) 462.
21. D. Ferreira de Lima, P. Petrov, D. Soper and M. Spannowsky, Quark-gluon tagging with shower deconstruction: unearthing dark matter and Higgs couplings, arXiv:1607.06031 [INSPIRE].
22. A.J. Larkoski, J. Thaler and W.J. Waalewijn, Gaining (mutual) information about quark/gluon discrimination, JHEP 11 (2014) 129 [arXiv:1408.3122] [INSPIRE].
23. B. Bhattacherjee, S. Mukhopadhyay, M.M. Nojiri, Y. Sakaki and B.R. Webber, Associated jet and subjet rates in light-quark and gluon jet discrimination, JHEP 04 (2015) 131 [arXiv:1501.04794] [INSPIRE].
24. J. Gallicchio and M.D. Schwartz, Quark and gluon jet substructure, JHEP 04 (2013) 090 [arXiv:1211.7038] [INSPIRE].
25. J. Gallicchio and M.D. Schwartz, Quark and gluon tagging at the LHC, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107 (2011) 172001 [arXiv:1106.3076] [INSPIRE].
26. J.R. Andersen et al., Les Houches 2015: physics at TeV colliders standard model working group report, arXiv:1605.04692 [INSPIRE].
27. ATLAS collaboration, Light-quark and gluon jet discrimination in pp collisions at s=7 TeV with the ATLAS detector, Eur. Phys. J. C 74 (2014) 3023 [arXiv:1405.6583] [INSPIRE].
28. C. Frye, A.J. Larkoski, M.D. Schwartz and K. Yan, Factorization for groomed jet substructure beyond the next-to-leading logarithm, JHEP 07 (2016) 064 [arXiv:1603.09338] [INSPIRE].
29. th International Conference on Machine Learning, July 5-9, Helsinki, Finland (2008).
30. P. Baldi, P. Sadowski and D. Whiteson, Searching for exotic particles in high-energy physics with deep learning, Nature Commun. 5 (2014) 4308 [arXiv:1402.4735] [INSPIRE].
31. S. Dieleman, K.W. Willet and J. Dambre, Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction, Mon. Roy. Astron. Soc. 450 (2015) 1441 [arXiv:1503.07077].
32. M.A. Nielsen, Neural networks and deep learning, Determination Press, U.S.A. (2015).
33. I. Goodfellow, Y. Bengio and A. Courville, Deep learning, MIT Press, U.S.A. (2016).
34. th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, April 11-13, Ft. Lauderdale, U.S.A. (2011).
35. K. Hornik, M. Stinchcombe and H. White, Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators, Neural Netw. 2 (1989) 359.
36. J. Schmidhuber, Deep learning in neural networks: an overview, Neural Netw. 61 (2015) 85 [arXiv:1404.7828].
37. C. Szegedy et al., Going deeper with convolutions, in the proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, June 7-12, Boston U.S.A. (2015), arXiv:1409.4842.
38. N. Srivastava et al., Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting, JMLR 15 (2014) 1929.
39. T. Sjöstrand, et al., An Introduction to PYTHIA 8.2, Comput. Phys. Commun. 191 (2015) 159 [arXiv:1410.3012] [INSPIRE].
40. M. Bahr et al., HERWIG++ physics and manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 58 (2008) 639 [arXiv:0803.0883] [INSPIRE].
41. J. Bellm et al., HERWIG 7.0/HERWIG++ 3.0 release note, Eur. Phys. J. C 76 (2016) 196 [arXiv:1512.01178] [INSPIRE].
42. M. Cacciari, G.P. Salam and G. Soyez, FastJet user manual, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1896 [arXiv:1111.6097] [INSPIRE].
43. t jet clustering algorithm, JHEP 04 (2008) 063 [arXiv:0802.1189] [INSPIRE].
44. D.E. Kaplan, K. Rehermann, M.D. Schwartz and B. Tweedie, Top tagging: a method for identifying boosted hadronically decaying top quarks, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008) 142001 [arXiv:0806.0848] [INSPIRE].
45. NNPDF collaboration, R.D. Ball et al., A determination of parton distributions with faithful uncertainty estimation, Nucl. Phys. B 809 (2009) 1
46. [Erratum ibid. B 816 (2009) 293] [arXiv:0808.1231] [INSPIRE]
47. P.Y. Simard, D. Steinkraus and J.C. Platt, Best practices for convolutional neural networks applied to visual document analysis, ICDAR 3 (2003).
48. F. Chollet, Keras, available at GitHub (2015).
49. th Python in science conference, June 28-July 3, Austin, U.S.A. (2010).
50. K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren and J. Sun, Delving deep into rectifiers: surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification, in the proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, December 11-18, Santiago, Chile (2015).
51. D. Kingma and J. Ba, Adam: a method for stochastic optimization, arXiv:1412.6980.
52. J. Snoek, H. Larochelle and R.P. Adams, Practical bayesian optimization of machine learning algorithms, in the proceedings of Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS 2012), December 3-8, Lake Tahoe, U.S.A. (2012), arXiv:1206.2944.
53. CMS Collaboration, Particle-flow event reconstruction in CMS and Performance for Jets, Taus and MET, CMS-PAS-PFT-09-001 (2009).
54. F. Pedregosa et al., Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python, JMLR 12 (2012) 2825.
55. A.J. Larkoski, G.P. Salam and J. Thaler, Energy correlation functions for jet substructure, JHEP 06 (2013) 108 [arXiv:1305.0007] [INSPIRE].
56. H. Küçük, Measurement of the inclusive-jet cross-section in proton-proton collisions and study of quark-gluon jet discrimination with the ATLAS experiment at the LHC, Dissertation, University College London, London. U.K. (2016).