A high-throughput stereo-imaging system for quantifying rape leaf traits during the seedling stage

Plant Methods

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Xiong, Xiong ^a   Yu, Lejun ^a   Yang, Wanneng ^b   Liu, Meng ^b   Jiang, Ni ^a   Wu, Di ^b   Chen, Guoxing ^b   Xiong, Lizhong ^b   Liu, Kede ^b   Liu, Qian ^a  

^a HUAZHONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b HUAZHONG AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Canopy three dimensional structure; Individual leaf traits; Morphological classification; Stereo imaging system

Indexed keywords

EID: 85011032040     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17464811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13007-017-0157-7     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Paulauskas A, Jodinskiene M, Griciuviene L, et al. Morphological traits and genetic diversity of differently overwintered oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cultivars. Zemdirb Agric. 2013;100(4):409-16.
2. Lorin M, Jeuffroy MH, Butier A, et al. Undersowing winter oilseed rape with frost-sensitive legume living mulch: Consequences for cash crop nitrogen nutrition. Field Crops Res. 2016;193:24-33.
3. Pospišil M, Brčic M, Husnjak S. Suitability of soil and climate for oilseed rape production in the Republic of Croatia. Agric Conspec Sci. 2011;76(1):35-9.
4. Pessel D, Lecomte J, Emeriau V, et al. Persistence of oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) outside of cultivated fields. Theor Appl Genet. 2001;102(6-7):841-6.
5. Rathke GW, Diepenbrock W. Energy balance of winter oilseed rape (Brassica napus L.) cropping as related to nitrogen supply and preceding crop. Eur J Agron. 2006;24(1):35-44.
6. Powers S, Pirie E, Latunde-Dada A, et al. Analysis of leaf appearance, leaf death and phoma leaf spot, caused by Leptosphaeria maculans, on oilseed rape (Brassica napus) cultivars. Ann Appl Biol. 2010;157(1):55-70.
7. Bylesjö M, Segura V, Soolanayakanahally RY, Rae AM, Trygg J, Gustafsson P, Jansson S, Street NR. LAMINA: a tool for rapid quantification of leaf size and shape parameters. BMC Plant Biol. 2008;8(1):82.
8. Efroni I, Eshed Y, Lifschitz E. Morphogenesis of simple and compound leaves: a critical review. Plant Cell. 2010;22(4):1019-32.
9. Yang W, Duan L, Chen G, et al. Plant phenomics and high-throughput phenotyping: accelerating rice functional genomics using multidisciplinary technologies. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2013;16(2):180-7.
10. Pérez-Pérez JM, Esteve-Bruna D, Micol JL. QTL analysis of leaf architecture. J Plant Res. 2010;123(1):15-23.
11. Cope JS, Corney D, Clark JY, et al. Plant species identification using digital morphometrics: a review. Expert Syst Appl. 2012;39(8):7562-73.
12. Muller-Linow M, Pinto-Espinosa F, Scharr H, et al. The leaf angle distribution of natural plant populations: assessing the canopy with a novel software tool. Plant Methods. 2015;11:11.
13. Chéné Y, Rousseau D, Lucidarme P, et al. On the use of depth camera for 3D phenotyping of entire plants. Comput Electron Agric. 2012;82:122-7.
14. Omasa K, Hosoi F, Konishi A. 3D lidar imaging for detecting and understanding plant responses and canopy structure. J Exp Bot. 2007;58(4):881-98.
15. Shibayama M, Sakamoto T, Takada E, et al. Estimating paddy rice leaf area index with fixed point continuous observation of near infrared reflectance using a calibrated digital camera. Plant Prod Sci. 2011;14(1):30-46.
16. Tsukaya H. Organ shape and size: a lesson from studies of leaf morphogenesis. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2003;6(1):57-62.
17. Neto JC, Meyer GE, Jones DD. Individual leaf extractions from young canopy images using Gustafson-Kessel clustering and a genetic algorithm. Comput Electron Agric. 2006;51(1-2):66-85.
18. Bama BS, Valli S M, Raju S, et al. Content based leaf image retrieval (CBLIR) using shape, color and texture features. Indian J Comput Sci Eng. 2011;2(2): 202-11.
19. Nam Y, Hwang E, Kim D. A similarity-based leaf image retrieval scheme: joining shape and venation features. Comput Vis Image Underst. 2008;110(2):245-59.
20. O'Neal ME, Landis DA, Isaacs R. An inexpensive, accurate method for measuring leaf area and defoliation through digital image analysis. J Econ Entomol. 2002;95(6):1190-4.
21. Bakr EM. A new software for measuring leaf area, and area damaged by Tetranychus urticae Koch. J Appl Entomol. 2005;129(3):173-5.
22. Igathinathane C, Prakash VSS, Padma U, et al. Interactive computer software development for leaf area measurement. Comput Electron Agric. 2006;51(1-2):1-16.
23. Weight C, Parnham D, Waites R. Technical advance: leafAnalyser: a computational method for rapid and large-scale analyses of leaf shape variation. Plant J. 2008;53(3):578-86.
24. Dengkui A, Minzan L, Li Z. Measurement of tomato leaf area using computer image processing technology. Sensor Lett. 2010;8(1):56-60.
25. Yang W, Guo Z, Huang C, et al. Genome-wide association study of rice (Oryza sativa L.) leaf traits with a high-throughput leaf scorer. J Exp Bot. 2015;66(18):5605-15.
26. Paulus S, Behmann J, Mahlein AK, et al. Low-cost 3D systems: suitable tools for plant phenotyping. Sensors (Basel). 2014;14(2):3001-18.
27. Frasson RPM, Krajewski WF. Three-dimensional digital model of a maize plant. Agric For Meteorol. 2010;150(3):478-88.
28. Dornbusch T, Lorrain S, Kuznetsov D, et al. Measuring the diurnal pattern of leaf hyponasty and growth in Arabidopsis-a novel phenotyping approach using laser scanning. Funct Plant Biol. 2012;39(11):860.
29. Chen S, Li YF, Zhang J, et al. Active sensor planning for multiview vision tasks. Berlin: Springer; 2008.
30. Henry P, Krainin M, Herbst E, et al. RGB-D mapping: using Kinect-style depth cameras for dense 3D modeling of indoor environments. Int J Robot Res. 2012;31(5):647-63.
31. Baumberg A, Lyons A, Taylor R. 3D S.O.M.-a commercial software solution to 3D scanning. Graph Models. 2005;67(6):476-95.
32. Zhou Z. 3D reconstruction from multiple images using single moving camera [D]. 2015.
33. Park J-S. Interactive 3D reconstruction from multiple images: a primitive-based approach. Pattern Recogn Lett. 2005;26(16):2558-71.
34. Herman M, Kanade T. Incremental reconstruction of 3D scenes from multiple, complex images. Artif Intell. 1986;30(3):289-341.
35. Seitz S M, Curless B, Diebel J, et al. A comparison and evaluation of multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. In: IEEE computer society conference on computer vision and pattern recognition; 2006. p. 519-528.
36. Scharstein D, Szeliski R. A taxonomy and evaluation of dense two-frame stereo correspondence algorithms: stereo and multi-baseline vision. New York: IEEE; 2002. p. 131-40.
37. Kise M, Zhang Q. Creating a panoramic field image using multi-spectral stereovision system. Comput Electron Agric. 2008;60(1):67-75.
38. Xia C, Li Y, Chon TS et al. A stereo vision based method for autonomous spray of pesticides to plant leaves. In: IEEE international symposium on industrial electronics. IEEE; 2009. p. 909-914.
39. Xiang R, Jiang H, Ying Y. Recognition of clustered tomatoes based on binocular stereo vision. Comput Electron Agric. 2014;106:75-90.
40. Wang C, Zou X, Tang Y, et al. Localisation of litchi in an unstructured environment using binocular stereo vision. Biosyst Eng. 2016;145:39-51.
41. Ivanov N, Boissard P, Chapron M, et al. Computer stereo plotting for 3-D reconstruction of a maize canopy. Agric For Meteorol. 1995;75(1-3):85-102.
42. Andersen HJ, Reng L, Kirk K. Geometric plant properties by relaxed stereo vision using simulated annealing. Comput Electron Agric. 2005;49(2):219-32.
43. Biskup B, Scharr H, Schurr U, et al. A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 2007;30(10):1299-308.
44. Biskup B, Scharr H, Fischbach A, et al. Diel growth cycle of isolated leaf discs analyzed with a novel, high-throughput three-dimensional imaging method is identical to that of intact leaves. Plant Physiol. 2009;149(3):1452-61.
45. Lou L, Liu Y, Han J, et al. Accurate multi-view stereo 3D reconstruction for cost-effective plant phenotyping. In: International Conference, Iciar; 2014. p. 349-356.
46. Rose JC, Paulus S, Kuhlmann H. Accuracy analysis of a multi-view stereo approach for phenotyping of tomato plants at the organ level. Sensors. 2015;15(5):9651-65.
47. Miller J, Morgenroth J, Gomez C. 3D modelling of individual trees using a handheld camera: accuracy of height, diameter and volume estimates. Urban For Urban Green. 2015;14(4):932-40.
48. Yang W, Guo Z, Huang C, et al. Combining high-throughput phenotyping and genome-wide association studies to reveal natural genetic variation in rice. Nat Commun. 2014;5:5087.
49. Song Y, Wilson R, Edmondson R, et al. Surface modelling of plants from stereo images.2007;312-319:312-9.
50. Edelsbrunner H, Seidel R. Voronoi diagrams and arrangements. Discr Comput Geom. 1986;1(1):25-44.
51. Farooq M, Tagle AG, Santos RE, et al. Quantitative trait loci mapping for leaf length and leaf width in rice cv. IR64 derived lines. J Integr Plant Biol. 2010;52(6):578-84.
52. Duan L, Yang W, Huang C, et al. A novel machine-vision-based facility for the automatic evaluation of yield-related traits in rice. Plant Methods. 2011;7(1):1-13.
53. Duan L, Huang C, Chen G, et al. High-throughput estimation of yield for individual rice plant using multi-angle RGB imaging. In: Computer and computing technologies in agriculture VIII. Springer, Berlin; 2015. p. 1-12.
54. Iosifidis A, Gabbouj M. Multi-class support vector machine classifiers using intrinsic and penalty graphs. Pattern Recogn. 2016;55:231-46.
55. Shi Z, Cheng J-L, Huang M-X, et al. Assessing reclamation levels of coastal saline lands with integrated stepwise discriminant analysis and laboratory hyperspectral data. Pedosphere. 2006;16(2):154-60.
56. Fung GM, Mangasarian OL. Multicategory proximal support vector machine classifiers. Mach Learn. 2005;59(1-2):77-97.
57. Breiman L. Random forests. Mach Learn. 2001;45(1):5-32.
58. Pardo M, Sberveglieri G. Random forests and nearest shrunken centroids for the classification of sensor array data. Sensors Actuat B Chem. 2008;131(1):93-9.
59. Bai X, Sun C, Zhou F. Splitting touching cells based on concave points and ellipse fitting. Pattern Recogn. 2009;42(11):2434-46.
60. Awrangjeb M, Lu G, Fraser C S, et al. A fast corner detector based on the chord-to-point distance accumulation technique. In: Digital image computing: techniques and applications. IEEE Computer Society; 2009. p. 519-525
61. White NDG, Jayas DS, Gong Z. Separation of touching grain kernels in an image by ellipse fitting algorithm. Biosyst Eng. 2005;92(2):135-42.
62. Jean-Yves B. Camera calibration toolbox for matlab [EB/OL]. http://www.vision.caltech.edu/. 12, 2011.
63. Jiang N, Yang W, Duan L, et al. A nondestructive method for estimating the total green leaf area of individual rice plants using multi-angle color images. J Innov Opt Health Sci. 2015;08(02):1550002.
64. Geiger A, Roser M, Urtasun R. Efficient large-scale stereo matching. In: Computer vision-ACCV 2010. Springer, Berlin; 2010. p. 25-38.
65. Cochran SD, Medioni G. 3-D surface description from binocular stereo. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 1992;14(10):981-94.
66. Fua P. A parallel stereo algorithm that produces dense depth maps and preserves image features. Mach Vis Appl. 1993;6(1):35-49.
67. Woebbecke D, Meyer G, Von Bargen K, et al. Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions. Trans ASAE. 1995;38(1):259-69.
68. Meyer G, Mehta T, Kocher M, et al. Textural imaging and discriminant analysis for distinguishingweeds for spot spraying. Trans ASAE. 1998;41(4):1189.
69. Petalas C, Anagnostopoulos K. Application of Stepwise discriminant analysis for the identification of salinity sources of groundwater. Water Resour Manage. 2006;20(5):681-700.
70. Chang C-C, Lin C-J. LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans Intell Syst Technol (TIST). 2011;2(3):27.
71. Navarro PJ, Fernando P, Julia W, et al. Machine learning and computer vision system for phenotype data acquisition and analysis in plants. Sensors 2016;16(5):641.
72. Liaw A, Wiener M. Classification and regression by random forest. R News 2001; 23(23).