Accuracy analysis of a multi-view stereo approach for phenotyping of tomato plants at the organ level

Sensors (Switzerland)

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 9651-9665

  Christian Rose, Johann ^a   Paulus, Stefan ^a   Kuhlmann, Heiner ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BONN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Close up laser scanning; Organ level parameterization; Plant phenotyping; SfM and MVS photogrammetry

Indexed keywords

COST EFFECTIVENESS; COSTS; FRUITS; LASER APPLICATIONS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SCANNING; STEREO IMAGE PROCESSING; SURFACE ANALYSIS;

AUTOMATED PROCEDURES; COST-EFFECTIVE METHODS; LASER SCANNING; MEASURING ACCURACY; PLANT PHENOTYPING; POST-PROCESSING PROCEDURE; REFERENCE MEASUREMENTS; STRUCTURE FROM MOTION;

INVESTMENTS;

ALGORITHM; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; CLASSIFICATION; IMAGE PROCESSING; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STEM; PROCEDURES; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOMATO;

ALGORITHMS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; PHENOTYPE; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STEMS;

EID: 84928660960     PISSN: 14248220     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/s150509651     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Dhondt, S.; Wuyts, N.; Inzé, D. Cell to whole-plant phenotyping: The best is yet to come. Trends Plant Sci. 2013, 18, 433–444.
2. Dornbusch, T.; Lorrain, S.; Kuznetsov, D.; Fortier, A.; Liechti, R.; Xenarios, I.; Fankhauser, C. Measuring the diurnal pattern of leaf hyponasty and growth in Arabidopsis a novel phenotyping approach using laser scanning. Funct. Plant Biol. 2012, 39, 860–869.
3. Kraft, M.; Regina, S.; Freitas, D.; Munack, A. Test of a 3D time of flight camera for shape measurements of plants. In Proceedings of the CIGR Workshop on Image Analysis in Agriculture, Budapest, Hungary, 26–27 August 2010; pp. 26–27.
4. Kizma, W.; Foix, S.; Alenyà, G. Plant leaf analalysis using Time of Flight camera under sun, shadow and room conditions. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robotic and Sensors Environments, Magdeburg, Germany, 16–18 November 2012.
5. Paulus, S.; Behmann, J.; Mahlein, A.K.; Plümer, L.; Kuhlmann, H. Low-cost 3D systems: Suitable tools for plant phenotyping. Sensors 2014, 14, 3001–3018.
6. Paulus, S.; Schumann, H.; Kuhlmann, H.; Léon, J. High-precision laser scanning system for capturing 3D plant architecture and analysing growth of cereal plants. Biosyst. Eng. 2014, 121, 1–11.
7. Tsaftaris, S.; Noutsos, C. Plant phenotyping with low cost digital cameras and image analytics. In Environmental Science and Engineering (Subseries: Environmental Science) Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2009; pp. 238–251.
8. Arvidsson, S.; Pérez-Rodríguez, P.; Mueller-Roeber, B. A growth phenotyping pipeline for Arabidopsis thaliana integrating image analysis and rosette area modeling for robust quantification of genotype effects. New Phytol. 2011, 191, 895–907.
9. Hartley, R.I.; Zisserman, A. Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision, 2nd ed.; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 2004.
10. Seitz, S.M.; Curless, B.; Diebel, J.; Scharstein, D.; Szeliski, R. A comparison and evaluation of multi-view stereo reconstruction algorithms. Proc. IEEE Conf. Compu. Vis. Pattern Recogn. 2006, 1, 519–528.
11. Ivanov, N.; Boissard, P.; Chapron, M.; Andrieu, B. Computer stereo plotting for 3-D reconstruction of a maize canopy. Agric. For. Meteorol. 1995, 75, 85–103.
12. Aguilar, M.; Pozo, J.; Aguilar, F.; Sanchez-Hermosilla, J.; Páez, F.; Negreirosb, J. 3D Surface Modelling of Tomato Plants Using Close-Range. Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci. 2008, XXXVII, 139–144.
13. Zhu, H.; Dorner, J.; Rowland, D.; Derksen, R.; Ozkan, H. Spray Penetration into Peanut Canopies with Hydraulic Nozzle Tips. Biosyst. Eng. 2004, 87, 275–283.
14. Santos, T.; Oliveira, A. Image-based 3D digitizing for plant architecture analysis and phenotyping. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Industry Applications (WGARI) in SIBGRAPI 2012 (XXV Conference on Graphics, Patterns and Images), Minas Gerais, Brazil, 22–25 August 2012.
15. Snavely, N.; Seitz, S.M.; Szeliski, R. Photo tourism: Exploring photo collections in 3D. In Proceedings of the SIGGRAPH Conference, Boston, MA, USA, 30 July–3 August 2006; pp. 835–846.
16. Nistér, D. An efficient solution to the five-point relative pose problem. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2004, 26, 756–770.
17. Furukawa, Y.; Ponce, J. Accurate, dense, and robust multiview stereopsis. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2010, 32, 1362–1376.
18. Santos, T.; Ueda, J. Automatic 3D plant reconstruction from photographies, segmentation and classification of leaves and internodes using clustering. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Function-Structural Plant Models, Saariselkä, Finland, 9–14 June 2013; pp. 95–97.
19. Jay, S.; Rabatel, G.; Gorrettta, N. In-Field Crop Row Stereo-Reconsruction for Plant Phenotyping. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Robotics and associated High-Technologies and Equipment for Agriculture and forestry (RHEA), Madrid, Spain, 21–23 May 2014; pp. 21–23.
20. Feller, C.; Bleiholder, H.; Buhr, L.; Hack, H.; Hess, M.; Klose, R.; Meier, U.; Stauss, R.; Van den Boom, T.; Weber, E. Phänologische Entwicklungsstadien von Gemüsepflanzen: II. Fruchtgemüse und Hülsenfrüchte, 1995 b. Nachrichtenbl. Deut. Pflanzenschutzd. 1995, 217–232. In Germany.
21. Paulus, S.; Dupuis, J.; Mahlein, A.K.; Kuhlmann, H. Surface feature based classiffication of plant organs from 3D laserscanned point clouds for plant phenotyping. BMC Bioinform. 2013, 14, 238, doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-238.
22. Strecha, C.; Bronstein, A.M.; Bronstein, M.M.; Fua, P. LDAHash: Improved Matching with Smaller Descriptors. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2012, 34, 66–78.
23. Küng, O.; Strecha, C.; Beyeler, A.; Zufferey, J.C.; Floreano, D.; Fua, P.; Gervaix, F. The Accuracy of Automatic Photogrammetric Techniques on Ultra-Light Uav Imagery. ISPRS 2012, XXXVIII-1/C22, 125–130.
24. Rui, Y.K.; Peng, Y.F.; Wang, Z.R.; Shen, J.B. Stem perimeter, height and biomass of maize (Zea mays L.) grown under different N fertilization regimes in Beijing, China. Int. J. Plant Prod. 2009, 3, 85–90.
25. Thornley, J.H.M. Modelling Stem Height and Diameter Growth in Plants. Ann. Bot. 1999, 84, 195–205.
26. Paulus, S.; Dupuis, J.; Riedel, S.; Kuhlmann, H. Automated analysis of barley organs using 3D laser scanning: An approach for high throughput phenotyping. Sensors 2014, 14, 12670–12686.
27. Frasson, R.P.D.M.; Krajewski, W.F. Three-dimensional digital model of a maize plant. Agric. For. Meteorol. 2010, 150, 478–488.
28. Granier, C.; Tardieu, F. Multi-scale phenotyping of leaf expansion in response to environmental changes: The whole is more than the sum of parts. Plant Cell Environ. 2009, 32, 1175–1184.
29. Gonzalez, N.; Vanhaeren, H.; Inzé, D. Leaf size control: Complex coordination of cell division and expansion. Trends Plant Sci. 2012, 17, 332–340.
30. Jansen, M.; Gilmer, F.; Biskup, B.; Nagel, K.; Rascher, U.; Fischbach, A.; Briem, S.; Dreissen, G.; Tittmann, S.; Braun, S.; et al. Simultaneous phenotyping of leaf growth and chlorophyll fluorescence via GROWSCREEN FLUORO allows detection of stress tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana and other rosette plants. Funct. Plant Biol. 2009, 36, 902–914.
31. Rascher, U.; Blossfeld, S.; Fiorani, F.; Jahnke, S.; Jansen, M.; Kuhn, A.J.; Matsubara, S.; Märtin, L.L.; Merchant, A.; Metzner, R.; et al. Non-invasive approaches for phenotyping of enhanced performance traits in bean. Funct. Plant Biol. 2011, 38, 968–983.
32. Topp, C.N.; Iyer-Pascuzzi, A.S.; Anderson, J.T.; Lee, C.R.; Zurek, P.R.; Symonova, O.; Zheng, Y.; Bucksch, A.; Mileyko, Y.; Galkovskyi, T.; et al. 3D phenotyping and quantitative trait locus mapping identify core regions of the rice genome controlling root architecture. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2013, 110, E1695–E1704.
33. Korhonen, L.; Vauhkonen, J.; Virolainen, A.; Hovi, A.; Korpela, I. Estimation of tree crown volume from airborne lidar data using computational geometry. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 34, 7236–7248.
34. Paproki, A.; Sirault, X.; Berry, S.; Furbank, R.; Fripp, J. A novel mesh processing based technique for 3D plant analysis. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 1–13, doi:10.1186/1471-2229-12-63.
35. Biskup, B.; Scharr, H.; Schurr, U.; Rascher, U. A stereo imaging system for measuring structural parameters of plant canopies. Plant Cell Environ. 2007, 30, 1299–1308.
36. Agisoft Photoscan. Available online: http://www.agisoft.com/ (accessed on 23 April 2015).
37. CloudCompare. Available online: http://www.danielgm.net/cc/ (accessed on 23 April 2015).
38. Octave. Available online: https://www.gnu.org/software/octave/ (accessed on 23 April 2015).