Student performance along axes of scenario novelty and complexity in introductory biology: Lessons from a unique factorial approach to assessment

CBE Life Sciences Education

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Deane Coe, Kirsten K ^a,b   Sarvary, Mark A ^a   Owens, Thomas G ^a  

^a Cornell University ^*  (United States)

^b St Mary's College of MD   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGY; EDUCATION; HUMAN; LEARNING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; STUDENT;

BIOLOGY; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; LEARNING; STUDENTS;

EID: 85011016475     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19317913     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1187/cbe.16-06-0195     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science (2011). Vision and Change in Undergraduate Biology Education: A Call to Action, Washington, DC.
2. Anderson JR (1993). Problem solving and learning. Am Psychol 48, 35.
3. Barnett SM, Ceci SJ (2002). When and where do we apply what we learn? A taxonomy for far transfer. Psychol Bull 128, 612.
4. Boud D, Falchikov N (2006). Aligning assessment with long‐term learning. Assess Eval High Educ 31, 399–413.
5. Catrambone R (1994). Improving examples to improve transfer to novel problems. Mem Cogn 22, 606–615.
6. Catrambone R (1995). Aiding subgoal learning: effects on transfer. J Educ Psychol 87, 5–17.
7. Catrambone R (1996). Generalizing solution procedures learned from examples. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22, 1020–1031.
8. Catrambone R (1998). The subgoal learning model: creating better examples so that students can solve novel problems. J Exp Psychol Gen 127, 355.
9. Cortright RN, Collins HL, DiCarlo SE (2005). Peer instruction enhanced meaningful learning: ability to solve novel problems. Adv Physiol Educ 29, 107–111.
10. de Koning BB, Tabbers HK, Rikers RMJP, Paas F (2007). Attention cueing as a means to enhance learning from an animation. Appl Cogn Psychol 21, 731–746.
11. Ding L, Beichner R (2009). Approaches to data analysis of multiple-choice questions. Phys Rev Spec Top Phy Educ Res 5, 020103.
12. Ebel RL, Frisbie DA (1986). Essentials of Educational Measurement, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Gerjets P, Scheiter K, Catrambone R (2004). Designing instructional examples to reduce intrinsic cognitive load: molar versus modular presentation of solution procedures. Instr Sci 32(1–2), 33–58.
14. Handelsman J, Miller S, Pfund C (2007). Scientific Teaching, New York: W. H. Freeman.
15. King A, Staffieri A, Adelgais A (1997). Mutual peer tutoring: effects of structuring tutorial interaction to scaffold higher level complex learning. J Educ Psychol 90, 134–152.
16. Lee Y (2004). Student perceptions of problems’ structuredness, complexity, situatedness, and information richness and their effects on problem-solving performance. Doctoral Dissertation, Tallahassee: College of Education, Florida State University.
17. Michael J (2001). In pursuit of meaningful learning. Adv Physiol Educ 25, 145–158.
18. Mintzes JJ, Wandersee JH (1997). Reform and innovation in science teaching: a human constructivist view. In: Teaching Science for Understanding, ed. JJ Mintzes, JH Wandersee, and JD Novak, San Diego, CA: Academic, 29–58.
19. Newell A (1980). Reasoning, problem-solving, and decision processes: the problem space as a fundamental category. In: Attention and Performance VIII, ed. R Nickerson, Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 693–718.
20. Novick LR, Holyoak KJ (1991). Mathematical problem solving by analogy. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 17, 398–415.
21. R Core Team (2015). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. www.R-project.org (accessed May 2016).
22. Reed SK, Dempster A, Ettinger M (1985). Usefulness of analogous solutions for solving algebra word problems. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 11, 106–125.
23. Reed SK, Saavedra NC (1986). A comparison of computation, discovery, and graph procedures for improving students’ conception of average speed. Cogn Instr 3, 31–62.
24. Reiser BJ (2004). Scaffolding complex learning: the mechanisms of structuring and problematizing student work. J Learn Sci 13, 273–304.
25. Roediger HL, Karpicke JD (2006). The power of testing memory: basic research and implications for educational practice. Perspect Psychol Sci 1, 181–210.
26. Rohrer D (2012). Interleaving helps students distinguish among similar concepts. Educ Psychol Rev 24, 355–367.
27. Ross BH (1987). This is like that: the use of earlier problems and the separation of similarity effects. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 13, 629–639.
28. Ross BH (1989). Distinguishing types of superficial similarities: different effects on the access and use of earlier problems. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 15, 456–468.
29. Schmidt-Rinehart BC (1994). The effects of topic familiarity on second language listening comprehension. Mod Lang J 78, 179–189.
30. Sweller J (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: effects on learning. Cogn Sci 12, 257–285.
31. Sweller J, Chandler P (1991). Evidence for cognitive load theory. Cogn Instr 8, 351–362.
32. Sweller J, Chandler P (1994). Why some material is difficult to learn. Cogn Instr 12, 185–233.
33. Van der Meij J, de Jong T (2006). Supporting students’ learning with multiple representations in a dynamic simulation-based learning environment. Learn Instr 16, 199–212.
34. Van Merrienboer JJ, Sweller J (2005). Cognitive load theory and complex learning: recent developments and future directions. Educ Psychol Rev 17, 147–177.
35. Wiersma W, Jurs SG (1990). Educational Measurement and Testing, 2nd ed., Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
36. Wood DA (1960). Test Construction: Development and Interpretation of Achievement Tests, Columbus, OH: Charles E. Merrill.