Past demography in forest trees: What can we learn from nuclear dna sequences that we do not already know?

Plant Ecology and Diversity

Volumn 1, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 209-215

  Lascoux, Martin ^a   Pyhäjärvi, Tanja ^b   Källman, Thomas ^a   Savolainen, Outi ^b  

^a UPPSALA UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

Author keywords

Coalescent; Demography; Last glacial maximum; Multilocus analysis; Nuclear DNA; Picea abies; Pinus sylvestris

Indexed keywords

EID: 85010619012     PISSN: 17550874     EISSN: 17551668     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17550870802328439     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Barrett RDH, Schulter D. 2007. Adaptation from standing variation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 23:38–44
2. Beaumont MA, Zhang W, Balding DJ. 2002. Approximate Bayesian Computation in population genetics. Genetics 162:2025–2035
3. Bennett KD. 1985. The spread of Fagus grandifolia across Eastern North America during the last 18, 000 years. Journal of Biogeography 12:147–164
4. Bennett KD. 1997. Evolution and ecology: the pace of life. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press
5. Birks HJB, Willis KJ. 2008. Alpines, trees, and refugia in Europe. Plant Ecology & Diversity 1:147–160
6. Clark JS, Fastie C, Hurtt G, Jackson ST, Johnson C, King GA, Lewis M, Lynch J, Pacala S, Prentice C, et al. 1998. Reid’s paradox of rapid plant migration. Dispersal theory and interpretation of paleoecological records. Bioscience 48:13–24
7. Dormling I. 1979. Influence of light intensity and temperature on photoperiodic response of Norway spruce provenances. In: Proc. IUFRO Jt. Meet. Work. Parties Norway spruce provenances Norway spruce breed. Bucharest: IUFRO. p. 398–407
8. Fay JC, Wu CI. 1999. A human population bottleneck can account for the discordance between patterns of mitochondrial versus nuclear DNA variation. Molecular Biology and Evolution 16:1003–1005
9. Fay JC, Wu CI. 2000. Hitchhiking under positive Darwinian selection. Genetics 155:1405–1413
10. Felsenstein J. 1988. Phylogenies from molecular sequences - inferences and reliability. Annual Reviews Genetics 22:521–565
11. Giesecke T, Bennett KD. 2004. The Holocene spread of Picea abies (L.) Karst. in Fennoscandia and adjacent areas. Journal of Biogeography 31:1523–1548
12. Gullberg U, Yazdani R, Rudin D, Ryman N. 1985. Allozyme variation in Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in Sweden. Silvae Genetica 34:193–201
13. Haddrill PR, Thornton KR, Charlesworth B, Andolfatto P. 2005. Multilocus patterns of nucleotide variability and the demographic and selection history of Drosophila melanogaster populations. Genome Research 15:790–799
14. Heuertz M, De Paoli E, Källman T, Larsson H, Jurman I, Morgante M, Lascoux M, Gyllenstrand N. 2006. Multilocus patterns of nucleotide diversity, linkage disequilibrium and demographic history of Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst). Genetics 174:2095–2105
15. Hey J. 2006. Recent advances in assessing gene flow between diverging populations and species. Current Opinions in Genetics and Development 16:592–596
16. Hicks S. 2006. When no pollen does not mean no trees. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 15:253–261
17. Hudson RR. 2002. Generating samples under a Wright-Fisher neutral model of genetic variation. Bioinformatics 18:337–338
18. Jesus FF, Wilkins JF, Solferini VN, Wakeley J. 2006. Expected coalescence times and segregating sites in a model of glacial cycles. Genetics and Molecular Research 5:466–474
19. Jesus FF, Wilkins JF, Solferini VN, Wakeley J. 2007. Pairwise coalescence times in a model of repeated glacial cycles. Preprint
20. Kingman JFC. 1982a. The coalescent. Stochastics Processes and their Applications 13:235–248
21. Kingman, JFC. 1982b. On the genealogy of large populations. Journal of Applied Probability 19A:27–43
22. Lagercrantz U, Ryman N. 1990. Genetic structure of Norway spruce (Picea abies): concordance of morphological and allozymic variation. Evolution 44:38–53
23. Lascoux M, Palmé AE, Cheddadi R, Latta R. 2004. Impact of the Ice Ages on the genetic structure of trees and shrubs. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 359:197–207
24. Latalowa M, van der Knaap WO. 2006. Late quaternary expansion of Norway spruce Picea abies (L.) Karst. in Europe according to pollen data. Quaternary Science Reviews 25:2780–2805
25. Latta RG. 1998. Differentiation of allelic frequencies at quantitative trait loci affecting locally adaptive traits. American Naturalist 151:283–292
26. Marjoram P, Tavaré S. 2006. Modern computational approaches for analysing molecular genetic variation data. Nature Reviews in Genetics 7:759–770
27. Mikola J. 1982. Bud-set phenology as an indicator of climatic adaptation of Scots pine in Finland. Silva Fennica 16:178–184
28. Ostrowski MF, David J, Santoni S, McKann H, Reboud X, Le Corre V, Camillieri C, Brunel D, Bouchez D, Faure B, et al. 2006. Evidence for a large-scale population structure among accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana: possible causes and consequences for the distribution of linkage disequilibrium. Molecular Ecology 15:1507–1517
29. Petit RJ, Csaikl U, Bordács S, Burg K, Coart E, Cottrell J, van Dam B, Deans JD, Glaz I, Dumolin-Lapégue S, et al. 2002. Chloroplast DNA variation in European white oaks: phylogeography and patterns of diversity based on data from over 2, 600 populations. Forest Ecology and Management 156:5–26
30. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
31. Przeworski M. 2002. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics 160:1179–1189
32. Przeworski M, Coop G, Wall JD. 2005. The signature of positive selection on standing genetic variation. Evolution 59:2312–2323
33. Pyhajarvi T, García-Gil MR, Knürr T, Mikkonen M, Wachowiak W, Savolainen O. 2007. Demographic history has influenced nucleotide diversity in European Pinus sylvestris populations. Genetics 177:1713–1724
34. Savolainen O, Pyhajarvi T, Knürr T. 2007. Gene flow and local adaptation in trees. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38:595–619
35. Schmid KJ, Ramos-Onsins S, Ringys-Beckstein H, Weisshaar B, Mitchell-Olds T. 2005. A multilocus sequence survey in Arabidopsis thaliana reveals a genome-wide departure from a neutral model of DNA sequence polymorphism. Genetics 169:1601–1615
36. Sperisen C, Büchler U, Gugerli F, Mátyás G, Geburek T, Vendramin GG. 2001. Tandem repeats in plant mitochondrial genomes: application to the analysis of population differentiation in the conifer Norway spruce. Molecular Ecology 10:257–263
37. Tajima F. 1989. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 123:585–595
38. Tenesa A, Navarro P, Hayes BJ, Duffy DL, Clarke GM, Goddard ME, Visscher PM. 2007. Recent human effective population size estimated from linkage disequilibrium. Genome Research 17:520–526
39. Thornton K, Andolfatto P. 2006. Approximate Bayesian inference reveals evidence for a recent, severe bottleneck in a Netherlands population of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 172:1607–1619
40. Vendramin GG, Anzidei M, Madaghiele A, Sperisen C, Bucci G. 2000. Chloroplast microsatellite analysis reveals the presence of population subdivision in Norway spruce. Genome 43:68–78
41. Voight BF, Adams AM, Frisse LA, Qian Y, Hudson RR, Di Rienzo A. 2005. Interrogating multiple aspects of variation in a full resequencing data set to infer human population size changes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 102:18508–18513
42. Wakeley J. 2003. Inferences about the structure and history of populations: coalescent and intraspecific phylogeography. In: Singh R, Uyenoyama M. editors. The evolution of population biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. p. 193–215
43. Wakeley J. 2008. Coalescent theory. An introduction. Greenwood Village, CO: Roberts and Company Publishers
44. Watterson GA. 1975. On the number of segregating sites in genetical models without recombination. Theoretical Population Biology 7:256–276
45. Willis KJ, van Andel TH. 2004. Trees or no trees? The environments of central and eastern Europe during the Last Glaciation. Quaternary Science Reviews 23:2369–2387
46. Wright SI, Bi IV, Schroeder SG, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, McMullen MD, Gaut BS. 2005. The effects of artificial selection of the maize genome. Science 308:1310–1314