Counselling considerations for chromosomal mosaicism detected by preimplantation genetic screening

Reproductive BioMedicine Online

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 369-374

  Besser, Andria G ^a   Mounts, Emily L ^b  

^a NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b Oregon Reproductive Medicine   (United States)

Author keywords

Genetic counselling; Mosaicism; Next generation sequencing; Preimplantation genetic screening; Prenatal diagnosis

Indexed keywords

CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM; EMBRYO; GENETIC COUNSELING; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NOTE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PRENATAL SCREENING; EMBRYO TRANSFER; EMBRYOLOGY; ETHICS; FEMALE; MOSAICISM; PREGNANCY; PROCEDURES; TRENDS;

EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMANS; MOSAICISM; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 85010332998     PISSN: 14726483     EISSN: 14726491     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.01.003     Document Type: Note

References (21)

1. Bernhardt, B.A., Soucier, D., Hanson, K., Savage, M.S., Jackson, L., Wapner, R.J., Women's experiences receiving abnormal prenatal chromosomal microarray testing results. Genet. Med 15 (2012), 139–145.
2. Eggermann, T., Soellner, L., Buiting, K., Kotzot, D., Mosaicism and uniparental disomy in prenatal diagnosis. Trends Mol. Med 21 (2015), 77–87.
3. Fiorentino, F., Bono, S., Biricik, A., Nuccitelli, A., Cotroneo, E., Cottone, G., Kokocinski, F., Michel, C.E., Minasi, M.G., Greco, E., Application of next-generation sequencing technology for comprehensive aneuploidy screening of blastocysts in clinical preimplantation genetic screening cycles. Hum. Reprod 29 (2014), 2802–2813.
4. Fragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Daphnis, D.D., Goodall, N.N., Mania, A., Griffiths, T., Gordon, A., Wells, D., Cytogenetic analysis of human blastocysts with the use of FISH, CGH and aCGH: scientific data and technical evaluation. Hum. Reprod 26 (2011), 480–490.
5. Fragouli, E., Alfarawati, S., Spath, K., Tarozzi, N., Borini, A., Wells, D., The developmental potential of mosaic embryos. Fertil. Steril, 104, 2015, e96.
6. Gebhart, M.B., Hines, R.S., Penman, A., Holland, A.C., How do patient perceived determinants influence the decision-making process to accept or decline preimplantation genetic screening?. Fertil. Steril 105 (2016), 188–193.
7. Greco, E., Giulia Minasi, M., Fiorentino, F., Healthy babies after intrauterine transfer of mosaic aneuploid blastocysts. N. Engl. J. Med 373 (2015), 2089–2090.
8. Gregg, A.R., Skotko, B.G., Benkendorf, J.L., Monaghan, K.G., Bajaj, K., Best, R.G., Klugman, S., Watson, M.S., Noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy, 2016 update: a position statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics. Genet. Med 18 (2016), 1056–1065.
9. Grifo, J., Colls, P., Ribustello, L., Escudero, T., Liu, E., Munne, S., Why do array-CGH (ACGH) euploid embryos miscarry? Reanalysis by NGS reveals undetected abnormalities which would have prevented 56% of the miscarriages. Fertil. Steril, 104, 2015, e14.
10. Huang, A., Adusumalli, J., Patel, S., Liem, J., Williams, J. 3rd, Pisarska, M.D., Prevalence of chromosomal mosaicism in pregnancies from couples with infertility. Fertil. Steril 91 (2009), 2355–2360.
11. Kleinveld, J.H., Ten Kate, L.P., van den Berg, M., van Vugt, J.M., Timmermans, D.R., Does informed decision making influence psychological outcomes after receiving a positive screening outcome?. Prenat. Diagn 29 (2009), 271–273.
12. Mamas, T., Gordon, A., Brown, A., Harper, J., Sengupta, S., Detection of aneuploidy by array comparative genomic hybridization using cell lines to mimic a mosaic trophectoderm biopsy. Fertil. Steril 97 (2012), 943–947.
13. Meldrum, D.R., Lightening the burden of care in assisted reproductive technology. Fertil. Steril 105 (2016), 1144–1145.
14. Munne, S., Wells, D., Cohen, J., Technology requirements for preimplantation genetic diagnosis to improve assisted reproduction outcomes. Fertil. Steril 94 (2010), 408–430.
15. Munne, S., Grifo, J., Wells, D., Mosaicism: ‘survival of the fittest’ versus ‘no embryo left behind. Fertil. Steril 105 (2016), 1146–1149.
16. PGDIS, Preimplantation Genetic Diagnosis International Society (PGDIS) position statement on chromosome mosaicism and preimplantation aneuploidy testing at the blastocyst stage. http://pgdis.org/docs/newsletter_071816.html, 2016 (Accessed 9 January 2016).
17. Robberecht, C., Schuddinck, V., Fryns, J., Vermeesch, J.R., Diagnosis of miscarriages by molecular karyotyping: benefits and pitfalls. Genet. Med 11 (2009), 646–654.
18. Scott, R.T. Jr., Galliano, D., The challenge of embryonic mosaicism in preimplantation genetic screening. Fertil. Steril 105 (2016), 1150–1152.
19. Spinner, N.B., Conlin, L.K., Mosaicism and clinical genetics. Am. J. Med. Genet. C Semin. Med. Gen 166C (2014), 397–405.
20. Taylor, T.H., Wing, R., Griffin, D.K., A technique to ‘map’ mosaicism at the blastocyst stage using comprehensive chromosome screening. Fertil. Steril, 104, 2015, e274.
21. Westerfield, L., Darilek, S., van den Veyver, I.B., Counseling challenges with variants of uncertain significance and incidental findings in prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis. J. Clin. Med 3 (2014), 1018–1032.