Barriers and facilitators to patient and public engagement and recruitment to digital health interventions: protocol of a systematic review of qualitative studies

BMJ Open

Volumn 6, Issue 9, 2016, Pages

  O'Connor, Siobhan ^a,b   Hanlon, Peter ^a   O'Donnell, Catherine A ^a   Garcia, Sonia ^c   Glanville, Julie ^c   Mair, Frances S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CHECKLIST; CINAHL; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA EXTRACTION; EMBASE; FEMALE; HUMAN; LIBRARY; MALE; MEDLINE; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY CONTROL; REVIEW; SCOPUS; SYNTHESIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TAXONOMY; HEALTH SERVICE; METHODOLOGY; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE; UTILIZATION;

HEALTH SERVICES; HUMANS; RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF CARE; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 85009884652     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20446055     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/BMJOPEN-2015-010895     Document Type: Review

References (65)

1. Yach D, Hawkes C, Gould CL, et al. The global Burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control. JAMA 2004;291:2616-22.
2. World Health Organisation (WHO). Preventing chronic disease a vital investment. Geneva: WHO, 2005.
3. Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for healthcare, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2012;380:37-43.
4. Beaglehole R, Bonita R, Horton R, et al. Priority actions for the non-communicable disease crisis. Lancet 2011;377:1438-47.
5. World Health Organisation (WHO). Prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases in the European Region: a progress report. Copenhagen: WHO Regional Office for Europe, 2013.
6. Payne RA, Abel GA, Guthrie B, et al. The effect of physical multimorbidity, mental health conditions and socioeconomic deprivation on unplanned admissions to hospital: a retrospective cohort study. CMAJ 2013;185:E221-8.
7. Bodenheimer T, Lorig K, Holman H, et al. Patient self-management of chronic disease in primary care. JAMA 2002;288:2469-75.
8. National Health Service (NHS). NHS 2010-2015: from good to great preventative, people-centred, productive. Crown: London, 2009. (December 15 2015). https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/nhs-2010-to-2015-from-good-to-greatpreventative-people-centredproductive
9. May C, Mort M, Williams T, et al. Health technology assessment in its local contexts: studies of telehealthcare. Soc Sci Med 2003;57:697-710.
10. Pagliari C, Detmer D, Singleton P. Potential of electronic personal health records. BMJ 2007;335:330.
11. Free C, Phillips G, Galli L, et al. The effectiveness of mobile-health technology-based health behaviour change or disease management interventions for healthcare consumers: a systematic review. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001362.
12. Hunkeler EM, Meresman JF, Hargreaves WA, et al. Efficacy of nurse telehealthcare and peer support in augmenting treatment of depression in primary care. Arch Fam Med 2000;9:700-8.
13. Steventon A, Bardsley M, Billings J, et al. Effect of telehealth on use of secondary care and mortality: findings from the Whole System Demonstrator cluster randomised trial. BMJ 2012;344:e3874.
14. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:220.
15. Varsi C, Gammon D, Wibe T, et al. Patients' reported reasons for non-use of an internet based patient-provider communication service: qualitative interview study. J Med Internet Res 2013;15: e246.
16. Buis LR, Janney AW, Hess ML, et al. Barriers encountered during enrollment in an internet-mediated randomized controlled trial. Trials 2009;10:76.
17. Sandaunet AG. The challenge of fitting in: non-participation and withdrawal from an online self-help group for breast cancer patients. Sociol Health Ill 2008;30:131-44.
18. Miyamoto S, Henderson S, Young H, et al. Recruiting rural participants for a Telehealth intervention on diabetes self-management. J Rural Health 2013;29:69-77.
19. Kerns JW, Krist AH, Longo DR, et al. How patients want to engage with their personal health record: a qualitative study. BMJ Open 2013;3:e002931.
20. Trief PM, Sandberg J, Izquierdo R, et al. Diabetes management assisted by telemedicine: patient perspectives. Telemed J E Health 2008;14:647-55.
21. Treweek S, Mitchell E, Pitkethly M, et al. Strategies to improve recruitment to randomised controlled trials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(4):MR000013.
22. Devlin AM, McGee-Lennon M, O'Donnell CA, et al. Delivering digital health and well-being at scale: lessons learned during the implementation of the dallas Program in the United Kingdom. JAMIA 2016;23:48-59.
23. Lloyd-Williams F, Mair F, Shiels C, et al. Why are patients in clinical trials of heart failure not like those we see in everyday practice? J Clinical Epid 2003;56:1157-62.
24. Mair FS, May C, O'Donnell C, et al. Factors that promote or inhibit the implementation of e-health systems: an explanatory systematic review. Bull World Health Organ 2012;90:357-64.
25. O'Connor S, Mair FS, McGee-Lennon M, et al. Engaging in large-scale digital health technologies and services. What factors hinder recruitment? Stud Health Technol Inform 2015;210:306-10.
26. Damschroder LJ, Aron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci 2009;4:50.
27. Sheldon TA. Making evidence synthesis more useful for management and policymaking. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005; 10:S1.
28. Mays N, Pope C, Popay J. Systematically reviewing qualitative and quantitative evidence to inform management and policymaking in the health field. J Health Serv Res Policy 2005;10(Suppl 1):6-20.
29. Finch T, May C, Mair F, et al. Integrating service development with evaluation in telehealthcare: an ethnographic study. BMJ 2003;327:1205-8.
30. Dixon-Woods M, Booth A, Sutton AJ. Synthesizing qualitative research: a review of published reports. Qual Res 2007;7:375.
31. Noyes J, Lewin S. Supplemental guidance on selecting a method of qualitative evidence synthesis, and integrating qualitative evidence with Cochrane intervention reviews. In: Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, et al., eds. Supplementary Guidance for Inclusion of Qualitative Research in Cochrane Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed online Aug 2016).
32. Hannes K, Booth A, Harris J, et al. Celebrating methodological challenges and changes: reflecting on the emergence and importance of the role of qualitative evidence in Cochrane reviews. Sys Rev 2013;2:84.
33. Gallacher K, Morrison D, Jani B, et al. Uncovering treatment burden as a key concept for stroke care: a systematic review of qualitative research. PLoS Med 2013;10:e1001473.
34. Morrison D, Wyke S, Agur K, et al. Digital asthma self-management interventions: a systematic review. J Medical Internet Res 2014;16: e51.
35. Carroll C, Booth A, Cooper K. A worked example of “best fit” framework synthesis: a systematic review of views concerning the taking of some potential chemopreventive agents. BMC Med Res Methodol 2011;11:29.
36. Challen K, Lee AC, Booth A, et al. Where is the evidence for emergency planning: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2012;12:542.
37. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding, and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology 2009;43:535-54.
38. Gallacher K, May CR, Montori VM, et al. Understanding patients' experiences of treatment burden in chronic heart failure using normalization process theory. Ann Fam Med 2011;9:235-43.
39. May CR, Mair F, Finch T, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci 2009;4:29.
40. McEvoy R, Ballini L, Maltoni S, et al. A qualitative systematic review of studies using the normalization process theory to research implementation processes. Implement Sci 2014;9:2.
41. May CR, Eton DT, Boehmer K, et al. Rethinking the patient: using burden of treatment theory to understand the changing dynamics of illness. BMC Health Serv Res 2014;14:281.
42. Shamseer L, Moher D, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation. BMJ 2015;349:g7647.
43. Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, et al. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol 2012;12:181.
44. Noyes J, Popay J, Pearson A, et al. Qualitative research and Cochrane reviews. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of interventions Version 5.1.0. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed online Aug 2016).
45. Ananiadou S, Rea B, Okazaki N, et al. Supporting systematic reviews using text mining. Soc Sci Comp Rev 2009;27:509-23.
46. O'Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, et al. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev 2015;4:5.
47. Sandelowski M, Docherty S, Emden C. Focus on qualitative methods Qualitative metasynthesis: issues and techniques. Res Nurs Health 1997;20:365-71.
48. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (CRD). Incorporating qualitative evidence in or alongside effectiveness reviews. In: Systematic reviews, CRDs guidance for undertaking reviews in healthcare. York, UK: University of York, 2008:219-39.
49. Gallacher K, Jani B, Morrison D, et al. Qualitative systematic reviews of treatment burden in stroke, heart failure and diabetes-Methodological challenges and solutions. BMC Med Res Methodol 2013;13:10.
50. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R. Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primary sources. BMJ 2005;331:1064-5.
51. Johansson T, Wild C. Telerehabilitation in stroke care-a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 2011;17:1-6.
52. Eysenbach G. The law of attrition. J Medical Internet Res 2005;7:e11.
53. Murray E, White IR, Varagunam M, et al. Attrition revisited: adherence and retention in a web-based alcohol trial. J Medical Internet Res 2013;15:e162.
54. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg 2009;151:264-9.
55. Hannes K. Critical appraisal of qualitative research. In: Noyes J, Booth A, Hannes K, et al., eds. Supplementary guidance for inclusion of qualitative research in Cochrane systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane Collaboration Qualitative Methods Group, 2011. www.cochrane-handbook.org (accessed online Aug 2016).
56. Popay J, Rogers A, Williams G. Rationale and standards for the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research. Qual Health Res 1998;8:341-51.
57. Dixon-Woods M, Shaw RL, Agarwal S, et al. The problem of appraising qualitative research. Qual Saf Healthcare 2004;13: 223-5.
58. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Healthcare 2007;19:349-57.
59. Booth A, Hannes K, Harden A, et al. COREQ (Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Studies). Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: A User's Manual. 2014:214-26.
60. Kuper A, Lingard L, Levinson W. Critically appraising qualitative research. BMJ 2008;337:a1035.
61. Barnett-Page E, Thomas J. Methods for the synthesis of qualitative research: a critical review. BMC Med Res Methodol 2009;9:59.
62. Oliver SR, Rees RW, Clarke-Jones L, et al. A multidimensional conceptual framework for analysing public involvement in health services research. Health Expect 2008;11:72-84.
63. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, eds. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge, 1994:173-94.
64. Mays N, Pope C. Qualitative research: rigour and qualitative research. BMJ 1995;311:109-12.
65. Bazeley P, Jackson K., eds. Qualitative data analysis with NVivo. London: Sage Publications Limited, 2014:1-307.