Delivering digital health and well-being at scale: Lessons learned during the implementation of the dallas program in the United Kingdom

Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 48-59

  Devlin, Alison M ^a   McGee Lennon, Marilyn ^b   O'Donnell, Catherine A ^a   Bouamrane, Matt Mouley ^b   Agbakoba, Ruth ^a   O'Connor, Siobhan ^a,c   Grieve, Eleanor ^a   Finch, Tracy ^d   Wyke, Sally ^a   Watson, Nicholas ^a   Browne, Susan ^a   Mair, Frances S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF STRATHCLYDE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^d NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Assistive living technologies; Consumer health informatics; EHealth implementation; Electronic health records; MHealth

Indexed keywords

ASSISTED LIVING FACILITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONSUMER; DATA ANALYSIS; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; HUMAN; LIFESTYLE; MARKETING; MODEL; SOCIOLOGICAL THEORY; TENSION; THEORETICAL MODEL; UNITED KINGDOM; WELLBEING; COMMUNITY CARE; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TELEMEDICINE;

COMMUNITY HEALTH SERVICES; HEALTH PLAN IMPLEMENTATION; HUMANS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; STATE MEDICINE; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84959535028     PISSN: 10675027     EISSN: 1527974X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocv097     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Christensen K, Doblhammer G, Rau R, et al. Ageing populations: the challenges ahead. The Lancet. 2009;374:1196-1208.
2. Bloom DE, Canning D, Fink G. The greying of the global population and its macroeconomic consequences. Twenty First Cent Soc. 2010;5(3):233-242.
3. World Health Organization. Telemedicine: opportunities and developments in Member States: Report on the second global survey on eHealth 2011. Global Observatory for eHealth Series, Vol. 2. ISBN 978 92 4 156414 4. ISSN 2220-5462. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241564144_eng.pdf?ua=1. Accessed February 20, 2015.
4. Department of Health (DH). Delivering 21st Century IT Support for the NHS: National Strategic Program [report]. London, UK: The Stationery Office Ltd; 2002.
5. NHS England, Care Quality Commission, Health Education England, Monitor, Public Health England, Trust Development Authority. NHS Five Year Forward View, 2014. London: NHS England. www.england.nhs.uk/ourwork/futurenhs/. Accessed February 22, 2015.
6. Scottish Government. eHealth Strategy 2011-2017. The Scottish Government, Edinburgh 2011. ISBN: 978-1-78045-376-7. http://www.gov.scot/Resource/Doc/357616/0120849.pdf. Accessed February 20, 2015.
7. May C, Gask L, Atkinson T, et al. Resisting and promoting new technologies in clinical practice: the case of Telepsychiatry. Soc Sci Med. 2001;52:1889-1901.
8. Anderson R. New MRC guidelines on evaluating complex interventions. BMJ. 2008;337:a1937.
9. Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Sheikh A. Ten key considerations for the successful implementation and adoption of large-scale health information technology. JAMIA. 2013;20:e9-e13.
10. Sheikh A, Cornford T, Barber N, et al. Implementation and adoption of nationwide electronic health records in secondary care in England: final qualitative results from prospective national evaluation in two early adopter" hospitals. BMJ. 2011;343:d6054.
11. Crosson JC, Stroebel C, Scott JG, et al. Implementing an electronic medical record in a family medicine practice: communication, decision making, and conflict. Ann Fam Med. 2005;3(4):307-311.
12. Goroll AH, Simon SR, Tripathi M, et al. Community-wide Implementation of Health Information Technology: The Massachusetts eHealth Collaborative Experience. JAMIA. 2009;16:132-139.
13. Greenhalgh T, Stramer K, Bratan T, et al. Adoption and non-adoption of a shared electronic summary record in England: a mixed method case study. BMJ. 2010;340:c3111.
14. Cresswell KM, Bates DW, Williams R, et al. Evaluation of a medium-term consequences of implementing commercial computerized physician order entry and clinical decision support prescribing systems in two 'early adopter' hospitals. JAMIA. 2014;21:194-202.
15. Finch TL, Mair FS, May CR. Teledermatology in the UK: lessons in service innovation. Brit J Dermatol. 2007;156:(3):521-527.
16. May C, Finch T. Implementing, embedding and integrating practices: an outline of normalization process theory. Sociology. 2009;43(3):535-554.
17. Boddy D, King G, Clark J, et al. The influence of context and process when implementing e-health. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9(1):9.
18. Plsek PE, Greenhalgh T. The challenge of complexity in health care. BMJ. 2001;323:625-628.
19. May CR, Mair F, Finch TL, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4:29.
20. McGee-Lennon M, Bouamrane M-M, Barry S, et al. Evaluating the delivery of assisted living lifestyles at scale (dallas). Proceedings of HCI 2012; the 26th BCS Conference on Human Computer Interaction. HCI 2012-People & Computers XXVI. Birmingham, UK, 12-14 September 2012. http://ewic.bcs.org/upload/pdf/ewic_hci12_diilt12_paper1.pdf. Accessed February 18, 2015.
21. Murray E, May C, Mair F. Development and formative evaluation of the e-Health Implementation Toolkit (e-HIT). BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2010;10:61.
22. May C, Finch T, Ballini L, et al. Evaluating complex interventions and health technologies using normalization process theory: development of a simplified approach and web-enabled toolkit. BMC Health Services Res. 2011;11:245.
23. Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8:63.
24. MacFarlane A, Clerkin P, Murray E, et al. The e-health implementation toolkit: qualitative evaluation across four European countries. Implement Sci. 2011;6(1):122.
25. Flatley Brennan P. Standing in the Shadows of Theory. JAMIA. 2008;15(2):263-264.
26. Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative Data Analysis for Applied Policy Research. In: Huberman AM, Miles MB, eds. The Qualitative Researcher's Companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc. 2002;12:305-329.
27. Sanders C, Rogers A, Bowen R, et al. Exploring barriers to participation and adoption of telehealth and telecare within the Whole System Demonstrator trial: a qualitative study. BMC Health Services Res. 2012; 12:220.
28. Lorenzi NM, Riley RT. Managing Change: An Overview. JAMIA. 2000;7:116-124.
29. McGowan JJ, Cusack CM, Bloomrosen M. The future of health IT innovation and informatics: a report from AMIA's 2010 policy meeting. JAMIA. 2012;19:460-467.
30. May CR, Finch TL, Cornford J, et al. Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done? BMC Health Services Res. 2011;11:131.
31. Mandl KD, Kohane IS. Escaping the EHR Trap-The Future of Health IT. New Engl J Med. 2012;366(24):2240-2242.
32. Kaplan B. Evaluating informatics applications-some alternative approaches: theory, social interactionism, and call for methodological pluralism. Int J Med Inform. 2001;64:39-56.
33. Mays N, Pope C. Rigour and qualitative research. BMJ. 1995;311:109-112.