Diabetes management assisted by telemedicine: Patient perspectives

Telemedicine and e-Health

Volumn 14, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 647-655

  Trief, Paula M ^a   Sandberg, Jonathan ^b   Izquierdo, Roberto ^a   Morin, Philip C ^a   Shea, Steven ^c   Brittain, Rebecca ^a   Feldhousen, Elizabeth Banks ^b   Weinstock, Ruth S ^b,d  

^a State University of New York Upstate Medical University: College of Medicine   (United States)

^b SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^d SYRACUSE VA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Case management; Diabetes; Elderly; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

BLOOD; BLOOD PRESSURE; GLUCOSE; HEALTH; TELECOMMUNICATION;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; CASE MANAGEMENT; DIABETES; DIABETES MANAGEMENT; EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS; ELDERLY; HEALTH OUTCOMES; HEALTH-CARE PROVIDERS; PRESSURE DATA; PRIMARY-CARE PROVIDERS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH;

TELEMEDICINE;

INSULIN;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLOOD PRESSURE; CASE MANAGEMENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES CONTROL; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIET THERAPY; DIETITIAN; EMOTIONAL STABILITY; FEMALE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEALTH CARE ACCESS; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH PROGRAM; HUMAN; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; TELECONFERENCE; TELEMEDICINE;

AGED; DIABETES MELLITUS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; MALE; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; TELEMEDICINE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 52749083960     PISSN: 15305627     EISSN: 15563669     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2007.0107     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Currell R, Urquhart C, Wainwright P, Lewis R. Telemedicine versus face-to-face patient care: Effects on professional practice and health care outcomes. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2000;2:CD002098.
2. Bensink M, Hailey D, Wootton RA. Systematic review of successes and failures in home telehealth: Preliminary results. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:8-16.
3. Hailey D. The evidence base for home telehealth: Some general points. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:1-2.
4. Mair F, Whitten P. Systematic review of studies of patient satisfaction with telemedicine. BMJ 2000;320:1517-1520.
5. Ingersoll S, Valente SM, Roper J. Nurse care coordination for diabetes: A literature review and synthesis. J Nurs Care Quality 2005;20:208-214.
6. Loveman E, Royle P, Waugh N. Specialist nurses in diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003;26:CD003286.
7. Norris SL, Nichols PJ, Caspersen CJ, Glasgow RE, Engelgau MM, Jack L, et al. Task force on community preventive Services: The effectiveness of disease and case management for people with diabetes. A systematic review. Am J Prev Med 2002;22(4 suppl):15-38.
8. Campbell M, Fitzpatrick R, Haines A, Kinmonth AL, Sandercock P, Spiegelhalter D, et al. Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. BMJ 2000;321:694-696.
9. Crowe B, MacIsaac P. The application of qualitative approaches to the evaluation of telehealth systems in Australia. J Telemed Telecare 2006;12:33-35.
10. Long AF, Gambling T, Young RJ, Taylor J, Mason JM, PACCTS Team. Acceptability and satisfaction with a telecarer approach to the management of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2005;28:283-289.
11. Shea S, Weinstock RS, Starren J, Teresi J, Palmas W, Field L, et al. A randomized trial comparing telemedicine case management with usual care in older, ethnically diverse, medically underserved patients with diabetes mellitus. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2006;13:40-51.
12. Shea S, Starren J, Weinstock RS, Knudson PE, Teresi J, Holmes D, et al. Columbia University's informatics for diabetes education and telemedicine (IDEATel) project: Rationale and design. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2002;9:49-62.
13. Trief PM, Teresi JA, Izquierdo R, Morin PC, Goland R, Field L, et al. (2007). Psychosocial outcomes of telemedicine case management for elderly patients with diabetes: IDEATel, a randomized trial. Diabetes Care 2007;30:1266-1268.
14. Bakken S, Grullon-Figueroa L, Izquierdo R, Lee NJ, Morin P, Palmas W, et al. IDEATel Consortium. Development, validation, and use of English and Spanish versions of the telemedicine satisfaction and usefulness questionnaire. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 2006;13:660-667.
15. Lofland J, Lofland JH. Analyzing social settings: A guide to qualitative observation and analysis, 3rd ed. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth, 1995.
16. Rafuls SE, Moon SE. Grounded theory methodology in family therapy research. In: Sprenkle DH, Moon SM (eds.) Research methods in family therapy. New York: Guilford, 1996:64-80.
17. Corbin J, Strauss A. Grounded theory research: Procedures, canons and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 1990;13:3-21.
18. Charmaz K. The grounded theory method: An explication and interpretation. In: Emerson RM (ed.) Contemporary field research. Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland, 1983:109-126.
19. Constas MA. Qualitative analysis as a public event: The development of category development procedures. Am Educ Res J 1992;29:253-266.
20. Trief PM, Himes CL, Orendorff R, Weinstock RS. The marital relationship and psychosocial adaptation and glycemic control of individuals with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1384-1389.
21. Trief PM, Sandberg J, Greenberg RP, Graff K, Castronova N, Yoon M. et al. Describing support: A qualitative study of couples living with diabetes. Families Systems Health 2003;21:57-67.
22. Geertz C. Thick description: Toward an interpretive theory of culture. In: Bohannan P, Glazer M (eds.), High points in anthropology, 2nd ed. New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1988:531-552.
23. Goetz JP, LeCompte MD. Ethnography and qualitative research in educational research. San Diego: Academic Press, 1984.
24. Lincoln Y, Guba E. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1985.
25. Seale C. The quality of qualitative research. London: Sage Publications, 1999.
26. Denzin NK. Sociological methods: A sourcebook, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1978.
27. Department of Veterans Affairs. Veterans Health Administration Diabetes Program. 2000. VHA clinical practice guidelines for the management of diabetes mellitus in the primary care setting. http/www.humanitas.com/vha/dm/ index.htm (Last accessed August 28, 2008).