Evaluating students’ written performance in the online classroom

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 2000, Issue 84, 2000, Pages 65-71

  Bauer, John F ^a   Anderson, Rebecca S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009554009     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.849     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Anderson, R. S (1998). Why talk about different ways to grade? The shift from traditional assessment to alternative assessment. In R. S. Anderson and B. W. Speck (Eds.), Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm (pp. 5-16). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
2. Bean, J. C and Peterson, D (1998). Grading classroom participation. In R. S. Anderson and B. W. Speck (Eds.), Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm (pp. 33-40). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
3. Berge, Z (1997). Characteristics of online teaching in post-secondary, formal education. Educational Technology, 37, 35-47.
4. Hobson, E. H (1998). Designing and grading written assignments. In R. S. Anderson and B. W. Speck (Eds.), Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm (pp. 51-57). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
5. Jonassen, D. H (1995, July-August). Supporting communities of learners with technology: A vision for integrating technology with learning in schools. Education Technology, pp. 60-63.
6. Knupfer, N. N Gram, T. E and Larsen, E. Z (1997). Participant analysis of a multi-class, multi-state, on-line, discussion list. Proceedings of Selected Research and Development Presentations at the 1997 National Convention of the Association for Educational Communication and Technology. (ED 409845) Ames: Iowa State University.
7. Lowry, M Koneman, P Osman-Jouchoux, R and Wilson, B (1994, March). Electronic discussion groups. Using e-mail as an instructional strategy. Tech Trends, pp. 22-24.
8. Marttunen, M (1998). Electronic mail as a forum for argumentative interaction in higher education studies. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 18 (4), 397-405.
9. McKinney, M (1998, Winter). Preservice teachers’ electronic portfolios: Integrating technology, self-assessment, and reflection. Teacher Education Quarterly, pp. 85-103.
10. Morrison, G. R and Ross, S. M (1998). Evaluating technology-based processes and products. In R. S. Anderson and B. W. Speck (Eds.), Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm (pp. 69-77). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
11. Mullin, J. A (1998). Portfolios: Purposeful collections of student work. In R. S. Anderson and B. W. Speck (Eds.), Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm (pp. 79-87). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
12. Ross, S and Morrison, G (1995). Evaluation as a tool for research and development: Issues and trends in its application to instructional technology. In R. D. Tennyson and A. E. Barren (Eds.), Automating instructional design: Computer-based development and delivery tools. New York: Springer Verlag.
13. Scanlon, P. A and Ford, M. P (1998). Grading student performance in real-world settings. In R. S. Anderson and B. W. Speck (Eds.), Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm (pp. 97-105). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
14. Sheingold, K and Fredericksen, J (1994). Using technology to support innovative assessment. In B. Means (Ed.), Technology and educational reform (pp. 111-131). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
15. Speck, B. W (1998). Unveiling some of the mystery of professional judgment in classroom assessment. In R. S. Anderson and B. W. Speck (Eds.), Changing the way we grade student performance: Classroom assessment and the new learning paradigm (pp. 17-31). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
16. Taylor, C. T (1994). Assessment for the measurement of standards: The peril and promise of large-scale assessment reform. American Education Research Journal, 31, 231-262.
17. Weiss, R. E and Morrison, G. R (1998). Evaluation of a graduate seminar conducted by listserv. Proceedings of Selected Paper Presentations at the Convention of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 463-478). Ames: Iowa State University.
18. Wiedmer, T. L (1998). Digital portfolios: Capturing and demonstrating skills and levels of performance. Phi Delta Kappan, 79 (8), 586-589.