Grading Student Performance in Real-World Settings

New Directions for Teaching and Learning

Volumn 1998, Issue 74, 1998, Pages 97-105

  Scanlon, Patricia A ^a   Ford, Michael P ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 44949090461     PISSN: 02710633     EISSN: 15360768     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tl.7410     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anderson, J. R., Reder, L. M., and Simon, H. “Situated Learning and Education.” Educational Researcher, 1996, 25, 5–11.
2. Barker, M. College of Nursing Documents. Oshkosh: University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, 1997.
3. Brandt, R. “On a New Direction for Teacher Evaluation: A Conversation with Tom McGreal.” Educational Leadership, 1996, 53, 30–33.
4. Darling-Hammond, L. The Teaching Internship: Practical Preparation for a Licensed Profession. Santa Monica, Calif.: The Rand Corporation, 1990.
5. Evans, K. S., and Vavrus, L. G. “The Role of Document Captions in Student Portfolios as a Link Between Teacher and Student Assessment.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Reading Conference, Miami Beach, Fla., December 1990.
6. Ford, M. P. “Begin with the End in Sight: Student Negotiated Evaluation in a Preservice Literacy Education Course.” New Era in Education Journal, 1996, 77 (1), 2–8.
7. Ford, M. P., Anderson, R., Bruneau, B., and Scanlan, P. “Student Portfolios in Four Literacy Education Contexts: Challenging Decisions About Evaluation and Grading.” In D. Leu, C. Kinzer, and K. Hinchman (eds.), Literacies for the 21st Century: Research and Practice—Forty-Fifth Yearbook of the National Reading Conference Yearbook. Chicago, Ill.: National Reading Conference, 1996.
8. Gibson, D. “Criteria for Establishing and Evaluating Public Relations Internship Systems.” Public Relations Quarterly, 1996, 41, 43–45.
9. Guskey, T. “Making the Grade: What Benefits Students?” Educational Leadership, 1994, 52 (2), 14–20.
10. Hartoonian, M., and Van Scotter, R. “School-to-Work: A Model for Learning a Living.” Phi Delta Kappan, 1996, 77, 555–560.
11. Milton, O., Pollio, H., and Eison, J. Making Sense of College Grades. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 1986.
12. Newman, J. “Yes, But What About Evaluation?” In K. Goodman (ed.), The Whole Language Catalog Supplement on Authentic Assessment. Santa Rosa, Calif.: Macmillan-McGraw Hill, 1992.
13. Ohlhausen, M., and Ford, M. “The Promise and Process of Portfolio Assessment in Literacy Education Classes.” In A. Frager and J. Miller (eds.), Using Inquiry in Reading Education. Canton, Ohio: The College Reading Association, 1992.
14. Rhodes, L. K., and Dudley-Marling, C. Readers, and Writers with a Difference: A Holistic Approach to Teaching Struggling Readers and Writers (2nd ed.). Portsmouth, N.H.: Heinemann, 1996.
15. Scanlan, P. A., and Heiden, D. E. “External Review of Portfolios in Preservice Teacher Education: Studying Our Own Practice.” Reading Horizons, 1996, 36, 297–316.
16. Sorenson, N. “Making Evaluation Longitudinal: Evaluation as History Writing.” In K. Goodman (ed.), The Whole Language Catalog Supplement on Authentic Assessment. Santa Rosa, Calif.: Macmillan-McGraw Hill, 1992.
17. Stahle, D. L., and Mitchell, J. “Portfolio Assessment in College Methods Courses: Practicing What We Preach.” The Journal of Reading, 1993, 36, 538–542.
18. Stern, D., and Rahn, M. “How Health Career Academies Provide Work-Based Learning.” Educational Leadership, 1995, 52, 37–40.
19. Toohey, S., Ryan, G., and Hughes, C. “Assessing the Practicum.” Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 1996, 21 (3), 215–228.
20. Ward, J. Social Work Department Documents, Oshkosh, Wis.: University of Wisconsin, Oshkosh, 1997.
21. Wiggins, G. “Assessment: Authenticity, Context, and Validity.” Phi Delta Kappan, 1993, 75 (3), 200–214.
22. Wilmore, E. “Brave New World: Field-Based Teacher Preparation.” Educational Leadership, 1996, 53, 59–63.