Performance Evaluation of Three Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems Using ISO 15197: 2013 Accuracy Criteria, Consensus and urveillance Error Grid Analyses, and Insulin Dosing Error Modeling in a Hospital Setting

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 85-92

  Bedini, José Luis ^a   Wallace, Jane F ^b   Pardo, Scott ^b   Petruschke, Thorsten ^c  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

^b BAYER CORPORATION   (United States)

^c BAYER AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

accuracy; blood glucose monitoring system; consensus error grid; Contour Next; diabetes; glucose meter; insulin dosing error; surveillance error grid

Indexed keywords

ASCORBIC ACID; CARBOHYDRATE; HEXOKINASE; INSULIN; PARACETAMOL; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ARTICLE; BLOOD GLUCOSE METER; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BOLUS INJECTION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DRUG UNDERDOSE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HUMAN; INSULIN SENSITIVITY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; VENOUS BLOOD; ANALYSIS; DEVICES; STANDARDS;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; HUMANS;

EID: 85009106626     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296815609368     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Diabetes Association, Standards of medical care in diabetes-2013. Diabetes Care. 2013; 36 (suppl 1): S11.
2. Bode BW,. The accuracy and interferences in self-monitoring of blood glucose. US Endocr Dis Touch Brief. 2007: 4-6.
3. Raine CH, Schrock LE, Edelman SV, et al. Significant insulin dose errors may occur if blood glucose results are obtained from miscoded meters. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2007; 1 (2): 205-210.
4. Turner RC, Holman RR, Cull CA, et al. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33). Lancet. 1998; 352 (9131): 837-853.
5. Davidson J., Strategies for improving glycemic control: effective use of glucose monitoring. Am J Med. 2005; 118 (suppl 9A): 27S-32S.
6. Saydah SH, Fradkin J, Cowie CC., Poor control of risk factors for vascular disease among adults with previously diagnosed diabetes. JAMA. 2004; 291 (3): 335-342.
7. ISO 15197. In vitro diagnostic test systems-requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus. 2013.
8. Virdi NS, Mahoney JJ., Importance of blood glucose meter and carbohydrate estimation accuracy. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2012; 6 (4): 921-926.
9. Krouwer JS, Cembrowski GS., A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2010; 4 (1): 75-83.
10. Parkes JL, Slatin SL, Pardo S, et al. A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care. 2000; 23 (8): 1143-1148.
11. Klonoff DC, Lias C, Vigersky R, et al. The surveillance error grid. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2014; 8 (4): 658-672.
12. Bedini JL, Wallace JF, Petruschke T, Pardo S,. A multi-center performance evaluation of a blood glucose monitoring system in 21 leading hospitals in Spain. [published online ahead of print 7, 2015 ]. J Diabetes Sci Technol.
13. Freckmann G, Pleus S, Link M, et al. Accuracy evaluation of four blood glucose monitoring systems in unaltered blood samples in the low glycemic range and blood samples in the concentration range defined by ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015; 17: 625-634.
14. Halldorsdottir S, Warchal-Windham ME, Wallace JF, et al. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American Comparator Trial. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2013; 7 (5): 1294-1304.
15. Freckmann G, Baumstark A, Schmid C, et al. Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2014; 16 (2): 113-122.