A Multicenter Performance Evaluation of a Blood Glucose Monitoring System in 21 Leading Hospitals in Spain

Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology

Volumn 10, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 93-100

  Bedini, José Luis ^a   Wallace, Jane F ^b   Petruschke, Thorsten ^c   Pardo, Scott ^b  

^a HOSPITAL CLÍNIC   (Spain)

^b BAYER CORPORATION   (United States)

^c BAYER AG   (Germany)

Author keywords

accuracy; blood glucose monitoring system; consensus (Parkes) error grid; Contour XT; diabetes mellitus; surveillance error grid

Indexed keywords

HEXOKINASE; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL;

ARTICLE; BLOOD ANALYSIS EQUIPMENT; BLOOD GLUCOSE MONITORING; BLOOD SAMPLING; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIABETES MELLITUS; ERROR; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; HYPOGLYCEMIA; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MONITOR; SELF MONITORING; SPAIN; ANALYSIS; CLINICAL TRIAL; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; BLOOD GLUCOSE SELF-MONITORING; HUMANS; SPAIN;

EID: 85009074838     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19322968     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1932296815598777     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bode Bruce W, The accuracy and interferences in self-monitoring of blood glucose. US Endocr Dis Touch Brief, 2007: 4-6.
2. Zuping Tang, Du Xiaogu, Louie Richard F, et al., Effects of drugs on glucose measurements with handheld glucose meters and a portable glucose analyzer. American Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2000; 113 (1): 75-86.
3. Breton Marc D, Kovatchev Boris P, Impact of blood glucose self-monitoring errors on glucose variability, risk for hypoglycemia, and average glucose control in type 1 diabetes: an in silico study. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2010; 4 (3): 562-570.
4. Budiman ES., Samant N., Resch A., Clinical implications and economic impact of accuracy differences among commercially available blood glucose monitoring systems. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2013; 7 (2): 365-380.
5. ISO 15197: In vitro diagnostic test systems-Requirements for blood-glucose monitoring systems for self-testing in managing diabetes mellitus, 2013.
6. Bernstein Robert, Parkes Joan Lee, Goldy Amy, et al., A new test strip technology platform for self-monitoring of blood glucose. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2013; 7 (5): 1386-1399.
7. Freckmann G., Pleus S., Link M., et al., Accuracy Evaluation of Four Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems in Unaltered Blood Samples in the Low Glycemic Range and Blood Samples in the Concentration Range Defined by ISO 15197. Diabetes Technol Ther, 2015.
8. Freckmann G., Baumstark A., Schmid C., et al., Evaluation of 12 blood glucose monitoring systems for self-testing: system accuracy and measurement reproducibility. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2014; 16 (2): 113-122.
9. Pflug B, Warchal-Windham ME, Goldy A, et al., Analytical accuracy evaluation of the CONTOUR® XT blood glucose meter. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2013; 7 (1): 281-284.
10. Bailey Timothy S, Wallace Jane F, Parkes Joan Lee, et al., Performance of a new blood glucose monitoring system in the hands of intended users. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2012; 14 (9): 783-789.
11. Halldorsdottir S., Warchal-Windham M. E., Wallace J. F., et al., Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems: the North American comparator trial. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2013; 7 (5): 1294-1304.
12. Krouwer J. S., Cembrowski G. S., A review of standards and statistics used to describe blood glucose monitor performance. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2010; 4 (1): 75-83.
13. Food and Drug Aministration U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Blood Glucose Monitoring Test Systems for Presciption Point-of-Care Use, Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff., 2014.
14. Smith H, Draper NR, Applied Regression Analysis. 3rd ed. 1998: John Wiley and Sons.
15. Parkes Joan L, Slatin Stephen L, Pardo Scott, et al., A new consensus error grid to evaluate the clinical significance of inaccuracies in the measurement of blood glucose. Diabetes Care, 2000; 23 (8): 1143-1148.
16. Klonoff David C, Lias Courtney, Vigersky Robert, et al., The surveillance error grid. Journal of Diabetes Science and Technology, 2014; 8 (4): 658-672.
17. Food and Drug Administration U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Blood Glucose Monitoring Test Systems for Prescription Point-of-Care Use, Draft Guidance for Industry and Food and Drug Administration Staff., 2014.
18. Tack Cornelius, Pohlmeier Harald, Behnke Thomas, et al., Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2012; 14 (4): 330-337.
19. Luijf Yoeri M, Mader Julia K, Doll Werner, et al., Accuracy and reliability of continuous glucose monitoring systems: a head-to-head comparison. Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics, 2013; 15 (8): 721-726.
20. Damiano Edward R, El-Khatib Firas H, Zheng Hui, et al., A comparative effectiveness analysis of three continuous glucose monitors. Diabetes Care, 2013; 36 (2): 251-259.