High-fidelity haptic and visual rendering for patient-specific simulation of temporal bone surgery

Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 21, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 85-101

  Chan, Sonny ^a   Li, Peter ^b   Locketz, Garrett ^b   Salisbury, Kenneth ^b   Blevins, Nikolas H ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Force feedback; Haptics; Simulation; Skull base surgery; Surgical planning; Virtual reality

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISSECTION; EAR SURGERY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; PATIENT SIMULATION; SURGERY; TEMPORAL BONE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; X-RAY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;

DISSECTION; FEEDBACK; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; OTOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PATIENT SIMULATION; PATIENT-SPECIFIC MODELING; TEMPORAL BONE; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 85009080379     PISSN: None     EISSN: 24699322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/24699322.2016.1189966     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Calhoun PS, Kuszyk BS, Heath DG, et al. Three-dimensional volume rendering of spiral CT data: theory and method. RadioGraphics. 1999;19:745-764.
2. Rubin GD, Beaulieu CF, Argiro V, et al. Perspective volume rendering of CT and MR images: applications for endoscopic imaging. Radiology. 1996;199:321-330.
3. Wiet GJ, Bryan J, Dodson E, et al. Virtual temporal bone dissection simulation. Stud Health Technol Informatics. 2000;70:378.
4. Wiet GJ, Stredney D, Sessanna D, et al. Virtual temporal bone dissection: an interactive surgical simulator. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;127:79-83.
5. Wiet GJ, Schmalbrock P, Powell K, et al. Use of ultrahigh-resolution data for temporal bone dissection simulation. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2005;133:911-915.
6. Kerwin T, Shen H-W, Stredney D. Enhancing realism of wet surfaces in temporal bone surgical simulation. IEEE Trans Visual Comp Graph. 2009;15:747-758.
7. Wiet GJ, Stredney D, Kerwin T, et al. Virtual temporal bone dissection system: OSU virtual temporal bone system: development and testing. Laryngoscope. 2012;122:S1-S12.
8. Petersik A, Pflesser B, Tiede U. Realistic haptic volume interaction for petrous bone surgery simulation. Comp Assist Radiol Surg. 2002;1:252-257.
9. Pflesser B, Petersik A, Tiede U, et al. Volume cutting for virtual petrous bone surgery. Comp Aided Surg. 2002;7:74-83.
10. Tolsdorff B, Petersik A, Pflesser B, et al. Individual models for virtual bone drilling in mastoid surgery. Comp Aided Surg. 2009;14:21-27.
11. Agus M, Giachetti A, Gobbetti E, et al. A multiprocessor decoupled system for the simulation of temporal bone surgery. Comput Visual Sci. 2002;5:35-43.
12. Agus M, Giachetti A, Gobbetti E, et al. Real-time haptic and visual simulation of bone dissection. Presence. 2003;12:110-122.
13. Neri E, Sellari Franceschini S, Berrettini S, et al. IERAPSI project: simulation of a canal wall-up mastoidectomy. Comp Aided Surg. 2006;11:99-102.
14. Morris D, Sewell C, Blevins N, et al. A collaborative virtual environment for the simulation of temporal bone surgery. Proceedings of Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer; 2004. p. 319-327.
15. Morris D, Sewell C, Barbagli F, et al. Visuohaptic simulation of bone surgery for training and evaluation. IEEE Comp Graph Appl. 2006;26:48-57.
16. Sewell C, Morris D, Blevins NH, et al. Validating metrics for a mastoidectomy simulator. Stud Health Technol Informatics. 2007;125:421-426.
17. Sewell C, Morris D, Blevins NH, et al. Providing metrics and performance feedback in a surgical simulator. Comp Aided Surg. 2008;13:63-81.
18. Chan S, Li P, Hoon Lee D, et al. A virtual surgical environment for rehearsal of tympanomastoidectomy. Stud Health Technol Informatics. 2011;163:112-118.
19. Solvsten Sorensen M, Mosegaard J, Trier P. The visible ear simulator: a public PC application for GPU-accelerated haptic 3D simulation of ear surgery based on the visible ear data. Otol Neurotol. 2009;30:484-487.
20. Kraut J, Hochman JB, Unger B. Temporal bone surgical simulation employing a multicore architecture. Proceedings of IEEE Canadian Conference of Electrical and Computer Engineering; 2013. p. 1-6.
21. Eugene Merchant M. Mechanics of the metal cutting process. I. Orthogonal cutting and a type 2 chip. J Appl Phys. 1945;16:267.
22. Archard JF. Contact and rubbing of flat surfaces. J Appl Phys. 1953;24:981-988.
23. Jacobs CH, Pope MH, Berry JT, et al. A study of the bone machining process - orthogonal cutting. J Biomech. 1974;7:131-136.
24. Engel K, Hadwiger M, Kniss JM, et al. Real-time volume graphics. Wellesley (MA): A K Peters; 2006.
25. Chan S, Conti F, Blevins NH, et al. Constraint-based six degree-of-freedom haptic rendering of volumeembedded isosurfaces. Proceedings of IEEE World Haptics Conference; 2011. p. 89-94.
26. McNeely WA, Puterbaugh KD, Troy JJ. Six degree-offreedom haptic rendering using voxel sampling. Proceedings of SIGGRAPH 98; 1999. p. 401-408.
27. Bruyninckx H, Khatib O. Gauss' principle and the dynamics of redundant and constrained manipulators. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2000. p. 2563-2568.
28. Redon S, Kheddar A, Coquillart S. Gauss' least constraints principle and rigid body simulations. Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation; 2002. p. 517-522.
29. Colgate JE, Stanley MC, Brown JM. Issues in the haptic display of tool use. IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, volume 3; 1995. p. 140-145.
30. Arbabtafti M, Moghaddam M, Nahvi A, et al. Physicsbased haptic simulation of bone machining. IEEE Trans Haptics. 2011;4:39-50.
31. Wiggins KL, Malkin S. Drilling of bone. J Biomech. 1976;9:553-559.
32. Krause WR. Orthogonal bone cutting: saw design and operating characteristics. J Biomech Eng. 1987;109: 263-271.
33. Plaskos C, Hodgson AJ, Cinquin P. Modelling and optimization of bone-cutting forces in orthopaedic surgery. Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention; 2003. p. 254-261.
34. Dillon NP, Kratchman LB, Dietrich MS, et al. An experimental evaluation of the force requirements for robotic mastoidectomy. Otol Neurotol. 2013;34: e93-e102.
35. Wu J, Yu G, Wang D, et al. Voxel-based interactive haptic simulation of dental drilling. Proceedings of ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences & Computers and Information in Engineering; 2009.
36. Misra A, Finnie I. Some observations on two-body abrasive wear. Wear. 1981;68:41-56.
37. Weaver JK. The microscopic hardness of bone. J Bone Joint Surg. 1966;48-A:273-288.
38. Zysset PK, Edward Guo X, Edward Hoffler C, et al. Elastic modulus and hardness of cortical and trabecular bone lamellae measured by nanoindentation in the human femur. J Biomech. 1999;32:1005-1012.
39. Drebin RA, Carpenter L, Hanrahan P. Volume rendering. Comp Graph. 1988;22:65-74.
40. Krüger J, Westermann R. Acceleration techniques for GPU-based volume rendering. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization; 2003. p. 287-292.
41. Tiede U, Schiemann T, Höhne KH. High quality rendering of attributed volume data. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization; 1998. p. 255-262.
42. Hadwiger M, Berger C, Hauser H. High-quality twolevel volume rendering of segmented data sets on consumer graphics hardware. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization; 2003. p. 301-308.
43. Chen JYC, Thropp JE. Review of low frame rate effects on human performance. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybernet A Syst Humans. 2007;37:1063-1076.
44. Li W, Mueller K, Kaufman A. Empty space skipping and occlusion clipping for texture-based volume rendering. Proceedings of IEEE Visualization; 2003. pages 317-324.