Development and validation of the student tool for technology literacy (ST2L)

Journal of Research on Technology in Education

Volumn 42, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 361-389

  Hohlfeld, Tina N ^a   Ritzhaupt, Albert D ^b   Barron, Ann E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH FLORIDA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Middle school; Performance assessment; Student perceptions; Technology literacy; Validation

Indexed keywords

EID: 85008796779     PISSN: 15391523     EISSN: 19450818     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2010.10782556     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association (APA), & National Council on Measurement in Education. (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, D.C.
2. Apple Computer, Inc. (1995). Changing the conversation about teaching, learning, & technology: A report on 10 years of ACOT research. Cupertino, CA: Apple Computer, Inc. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://imet.csus.edu/imetl/baeza/PDF%20Files/Upload/10yr.pdf
3. Axelson, M. (2005). Online assessments of technology literacy: The perfect Petri dish. Insight, 5,1-24.
4. Certiport. (2009). The Internet and Computing Core Certification (IC3®). Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.certiport.com
5. Cizek, G. J. (Ed.). (2001). Setting performance standards: Concepts, methods, and perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
6. Crocker, L. M., & Algina, J. (1986). Introduction to classical and modern test theory. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Group/Thomson Learning.
7. Design-Based Research Collective. (2003). Design-based research: An emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educational Researcher, 32(1), 5-8.
8. Florida Department of Education. (2009). Final LEA EETT Parti: Entitlement project reporting guidance. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.fldoe.org/BII/Instruct_Tech/EETT/Partl/word/2008-09-EETT-PART-I-FINAL-EVAL-REPORT.doc
9. Gamire, E., & Pearson, G. (Eds.). (2006). Tech tally approaches to assessing technological literacy. Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press.
10. Georgia Department of Education (2008). One stop shop for educators: Georgia technology literacy assessment toolkit. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://gadoe.georgiastandards.org/toolkit.aspx
11. Harmes, J., Barron, A. & Kemker, K. (2007). Development and implementation of an online tool to assess teacher technology skills. In R. Carlsen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 802-805). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.
12. International Computer Driving License (ICDL). (2009). The international computer driving license program. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://65.99.150.19/icdlus-lms-webclient/homepage/index.jsp
13. International Society of Technology in Education (ISTE). (1998). NETS for students. Retrieved September 30,2009, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/1998Standards/NETS_for_Students_l 998.htm
14. International Society of Technology in Education (ISTE). (2007). NETS for students, refreshed. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.iste.org/Content/NavigationMenu/NETS/ForStudents/2007Standards/NETS_for_Students_2007.htm
15. International Technology Education Association (ITEA). (2007). Standards for technological literacy (3rd ed.). Reston, VA: International Technology Education Association (ITEA). Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.iteaconnect.org/TAA/PDFs/xstnd.pdf
16. K to Eighth Power. (2008).Computer literacy and technology education. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.kto8.com/index.php
17. Kay, K., & Honey, M. (2005). Beyond technology competency: A vision of information communication technology literacy to prepare students for the 21st century. Insight, 5, 1-18.
18. Kemker, K. (2007). Leveraging laptops. T.H.E. Journal, 34(7), 32. Retrieved on September 30, 2009, from http://thejournal.com/articles/2007/07/01/curriculumbased-reform-florida.aspx
19. Kerlinger, F. (1986). Foundations of behavioral research (3rd ed.). New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
20. Learning Point Associates. (2005). NETS for students: Achievement rubric grades PK-12.
21. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/nets/p-12rubric.pdf
22. Lennon, M., Kirsch, I., Von Davier, M., Wagner, M., & Yamamoto, K. (2003). Feasibility study for the PISA ICT literacy assessment. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/35/13/33699866.pdf
23. Metiri Group. (2009). National trends report: Enhancing Education through Technology (EETT) Round 6, fiscal year 2007. Washington, D.C.: The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA). Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.setda.org
24. Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (MCEETYA). (2007). National Assessment Program: ICT literacy years 6 and 10 report 2005. Carlton South, VIC, Australia: Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.mceetya.edu.au/verve/_resources/NAP_ICTL_2005_Years_6_and_10_Report.pdf
25. National Assessment Governing Board (NAGB). (2009). Technological literacy framework for the 2012 National Assessment of Educational Progress, discussion draft-7124109. National Assessment Governing Board. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.edweek.org/media/nagb_assessment_devel_comm_aug_7-09.pdf
26. Nunnally, J. (1978). Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.
27. Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development (OECD). (2005). Are students ready for a technology-rich world? What PISA studies tell us. Paris: OECD Publications.
28. Parshall, C. G., Harmes, J. C., Rendina-Gobioff, G., & Jones, P. K. (2004). Final evaluation report: Teacher technology literacy inventory: Development and field test. Florida Department of Education. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://www.flstar.org/docs/TeachTechLitFinalEvalpdf
29. Parshall, C. G., Spray, J. A., Kalohn, J. C, & Davey, T. (2002). Practical considerations in computer-based testing. New York: Springer.
30. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2008). KS3 ICT assessment tasks. Retrieved September 30, 2009, from http://testsandexams.qcda.gov.uk/18908.aspx
31. Quellmalz, E. S., & Kozma, R. (2003). Designing assessments of learning with technology. Assessment in Education, 10(3), 389-407. Retrieved September 30,2009, from http://robertkozma.com/images/kozma_ed_assessment_quellmalz.pdf
32. Russell M., & Higgins, J. (2003). Assessing effects of technology on learning: Limitations of today’s standardized tests. Boston College: Technology and Assessment Study Collaborative. Retrieved September 30,2009, from http://escholarship.bc.edu/intasc/3/
33. Stansbury, M. (2008). States struggle with assessing technology literacy. eSchool News Online. Retrieved September 30,2009, from http://www.eschoolnews.com/news/top-news/?i=53017
34. Taylor, L. (2005). ICT literacy: Equipping students to succeed in an information-rich, technology- based society. Educational Testing Service. Retrieved September 30,2009, from http://www.ets.org/Media/Tests/ICT_Literacy/pdf/ICT_Equipping_Students_to_Succeed.pdf
35. T.E.S.T., Inc. (2007). TAGLIT: Taking a good look at technology. Retrieved September 30,2009, from http://www.testkids.com/taglit/?CFID=99530&CFTOKEN=26228741
36. U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind: Enhancing Education through Technology Act of2001. Retrieved September 30,2009, from http://www.ed.gov/policy/elsec/leg/esea02/pg34.html
37. U.S. Department of Education. (2009). Evaluation of the Enhancing Education through Technology Program: Final report. Washington, D.C.: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, Policy and Program Studies Service. Retrieved September 30,2009, from http://www.ed.gov/about/offices/list/opepd/ppss/reports.html
38. Wenglinsky, H. (2005). Using technology wisely: The keys to success in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.